Abstract
In recent years, the tissue engineering (TE) field has significantly benefited from advanced techniques such as additive manufacturing (AM), for the design of customized 3D scaffolds with the aim of guided tissue repair. Among the wide range of materials available to biomanufacture 3D scaffolds, poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) clearly arises as the synthetic polymer with the greatest potential, due to its unique properties – namely, biocompatibility, biodegradability, thermal and chemical stability and processability. This study aimed for the first time to investigate the effect of pore geometry on the in vitro enzymatic chain cleavage mechanism of PCL scaffolds manufactured by the AM extrusion process.
Methods: Morphological properties of 3D printed PCL scaffolds before and after degradation were evaluated using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and micro-computed tomography (μ-CT). Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) was employed to determine possible variations in the crystallinity of the scaffolds during the degradation period. The molecular weight was assessed using Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) while the mechanical properties were investigated under static compression conditions.
Morphological results suggested a uniform reduction of filament diameter, while increasing the scaffolds’ porosity. DSC analysis revealed and increment in the crystallinity degree while the molecular weight, evaluated through SEC, remained almost constant during the incubation period (25 days). Mechanical analysis highlighted a decrease in the compressive modulus and maximum stress over time, probably related to the significant weight loss of the scaffolds.
All of these results suggest that PCL scaffolds undergo enzymatic degradation through a surface erosion mechanism, which leads to significant variations in mechanical, physical and chemical properties, but which has little influence on pore geometry.
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2017; 15(3): e185 - e195
Article Type: ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
DOI:10.5301/jabfm.5000363
Authors
Joana Ferreira, Antonio Gloria, Stefania Cometa, Jorge F.J. Coelho, Marco DomingosArticle History
- • Accepted on 04/05/2017
- • Available online on 15/06/2017
- • Published online on 27/07/2017
Disclosures
This article is available as full text PDF.
Introduction
Tissue engineering (TE) products are generally based on the combination of artificial scaffolds – characterized by satisfying porosity, biocompatibility and biodegradability properties – with cells. This approach arises as one of the most promising strategies for the successful reconstruction of damaged tissues and organs (1). Scaffolds are engineered to provide an immediate biomechanical support at the site of implantation, to stimulate the new tissue ingrowth and to be gradually eliminated through a degradation mechanism, characterized by a precise balance between the implant degradation duration and the tissue regeneration rate (2). The inability to synchronize these rates may generate instability in the neo tissue, leading to premature mechanical failure of the entire system (3).
The most common materials used to design and construct artificial tissues (i.e., synthetic polymers) must possess a wide range of properties that span the range from mechanical to biochemical properties, including biodegradability and its mutability with time (4, 5). Furthermore, the degradation of polymeric matrices is a phenomenon that can be influenced by different variables. Among these, we can distinguish between the inherent chemical-physical properties of the polymer (i.e., chemical structure, degree of polymerization, degree of crystallinity, etc.) and properties related to the scaffold architecture (dimension, geometry and porosity of the implant), as well as many external factors (including pH of degradation medium, temperature or presence of enzymes, cells or tissues, etc.). Despite its importance in the overall performance of TE scaffolds, the breakdown process of a synthetic polymer is defined by a terminology that appears to be quite inconsistent. Hence, to avoid the misleading use of the term
Terminology and definitions applied for the degradation of synthetic polymers (6)
Terminology | Definition |
---|---|
Biodegradable | Solid polymeric devices which break down to macromolecule degradation with dispersion in an animal body but no proof for elimination from the body. |
Bioresorbable | Solid materials which can degrade and further resorb in vivo – i.e., which are eliminated through natural pathways either because of simple filtration of degradation by-products or after their metabolization. |
Bioabsorbable | Solid polymeric materials or devices which can dissolve in body fluids without any polymer chain cleavage or molecular mass decrease. |
Bioerodible | Solid polymeric materials or devices which undergo surface degradation via an erosion mechanism when in contact with living elements such as tissues, cells or fluids. |
Poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) is one of the most important polymers used in the production of long-term degradable TE implants, thanks to its high stability, ease of processability under mild conditions, excellent biocompatibility and consistent degradation rates (7-8-9). PCL is generally categorized as a biodegradable aliphatic polyester; however, the most precise definition for PCL should be “bioresorbable,” since its chain breakdown pathway leads to the formation of degradation products which can be rapidly eliminated by the body without cytotoxic effects (10). However, as Pitt et al suggested (11), in studying the PCL degradation behavior both in vitro and in vivo, the term
On the other hand, surface erosion occurs when nonequilibrium is reached in the reaction-diffusion mechanism: in this case, penetration of the degradation medium into the polymer matrix is significantly slower than hydrolysis, thus enabling the surface degradation by-products to rapidly migrate in the aqueous medium, while preventing the medium itself from moving inside the matrix interior. Consequently, the degradation mainly occurs at the more exposed polymer layers, causing the thinning of the constructs without changing polymer molecular weight.
The enzymatic degradation process can be driven by an ester bond cleavage caused by enzymes like lipase. This cleavage occurs mainly due to similarity of polyesters to lipids where, normally, an ester bond is formed between carboxylic acid functionalities present in fatty acids and alcoholic ones present in molecules such as glycerol (17). Based on the literature, there are 3 types of lipase capable of accelerating the degradation of PCL:
The degradation time of PCL-containing structures, evaluated by simulating the in vivo conditions, is relatively high and can last up to 4 years (21). As reported by Zhang et al (22), the degradation process, evaluated in vitro of 3-dimensional (3D) PCL scaffolds fabricated by combining a salt leaching process and thermally induced phase separation, is strongly influenced by the porosity of the structures. PCL scaffolds with higher porosity, when immersed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution for 72 weeks, presented a higher degree of degradation compared with scaffolds with smaller porosity.
Duarte and coworkers (13) investigated the effect of α-amylase and/or lipase on the in vitro degradation rate of starch-based PCL scaffolds produced using supercritical fluid technology. The results showed that, in contrast to α-amylase, lipase strongly affected the degradation of PCL that underwent a bulk degradation process, mainly based on hydrolysis of polymer chains.
Castilla-Cortazar et al (23) investigated the PCL degradation process under hydrolytic and enzymatic conditions, evaluating the weight loss, swelling ratio and mechanical property changes. The results obtained showed that the enzymatic degradation mechanism was different from that which occurred by hydrolysis. Moreover, the degradation rate was found to be faster in the presence than in the absence of enzymes. In agreement with other works, the enzymatic degradation followed a surface erosion route, while the hydrolytic degradation involved the whole sample through a bulk degradation mechanism.
Domingos et al (24, 25) evaluated the influence of the degradation media (i.e., PBS and simulated body fluid [SBF]) and scaffold internal architecture on the degradation mechanisms of PCL scaffolds obtained using a highly reproducible and low-cost BioExtruder system (26), which had been used to produce 3D scaffolds with a more controlled microarchitecture in comparison with conventional manufacturing techniques (27). Results of degradation in the chosen simulating fluids highlighted a strong influence of both the degradation media and scaffold pore size on the degradation kinetics of PCL. These 3D PCL scaffolds have been successively studied in terms of the (i) effect of process parameters on the morphological and mechanical properties of the scaffolds (28) and (ii) effect of pore size and geometry on compressive mechanical behavior and human mesenchymal stem cell viability (29).
Despite the relevant amount of work completed as well as the numerous data available in the literature, it is interesting to note that it is still not clear how some architectural parameters such as pore geometry can actually influence the in vitro enzymatic degradation process of PCL scaffolds. Hence, this present work aimed to analyze the influence of pore geometry on the enzymatic degradation in vitro of 3D PCL scaffolds, with a special focus on morphological, chemical-physical and mechanical properties. The novelty of this work consists in its use of 3D printing technology to produce highly accurate and reproducible scaffolds to systematically study the influence of pore geometry on the in vitro enzymatic degradation kinetics of PCL scaffolds. This is something that is not achievable with any other manufacturing technique (i.e., solvent casting, freeze drying, etc.) due to the high variability between the samples produced by those techniques. The results from this work can then be combined with biological and mechanical information, to generate a design database for the production of scaffolds with optimized architectural features (i.e., dimensions and distribution of the pores) for the regeneration of different tissues.
Materials and methods
Materials
Linear thermoplastic PCL with a molecular weight (Mw) of 50,000 Da (Capa® 6500; Perstorp Caprolactones, Cheshire, UK) in the form of pellets was employed as received, for the production of 3D scaffolds. Lipase enzyme (Amano Lipase PS, from
Scaffold design and fabrication
3D structures based on PCL were fabricated using an extrusion-based additive manufacturing (AM) device called the BioExtruder, which was equipped with a nozzle with a 300-μm inner diameter (26). Block samples were initially designed (30 × 30 × 8 mm3) using computer-aided design (CAD) software (Solid Works, Dassault Systemes, SA). Three different lay-down patterns were adopted with a filament distance (FD) fixed at 1,000 µm and a slice thickness (ST) at 280 µm: square (0/90°), triangular (0/60/120°) and complex polygonal (0/45/90/135°) internal pore geometries were obtained, as shown elsewhere (29).
PCL in the form of pellets was directly melted in the material chamber of the BioExtruder and then transferred to the screw-extrusion chamber via compressed air. Based on previous results, the structures were produced considering the optimized processing conditions indicated in
Process and instrument parameters employed to fabricate 3D bioextruded poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds
Process and instrument parameters | |||
---|---|---|---|
DV (mm/s) | LT (°C) | EP (bar) | SRV (rpm) |
DV = deposition velocity; LT = liquefier temperature; EP = extrusion pressure; SRV = screw rotation velocity. | |||
10 | 80 | 4 | 30 |
Degradation assay
Seven specimens of each scaffold topology, after being sterilized with UV radiation for 30 minutes, were cut into smaller samples, measuring 4 × 4 × 8 mm, accurately weighed (
Scaffold characterization
Morphological analysis
Morphological features of nondegraded and degraded scaffolds, including the architecture, pore shape and filament size, were assessed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis using a FEI (FEI Quanta 600F) apparatus. Micro-computed tomography (µ-CT) analysis was carried out using a SkyScan 1072 system (Aartselaar, Belgium). Rotational steps of 0.9° and rotation angle of 180° were set up. In this manner, information on the internal structure of degraded and nondegraded scaffolds (i.e., porosity, pore shape, size and interconnectivity, as well as surface area to volume) was obtained. Cross-sections and 3D models were reconstructed at different degradation times using the software package SkyScan and Image J software.
Differential scanning calorimetry analysis
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was employed to monitor changes in the thermal properties of the scaffolds linked to the degradation time, using a DSC Q2000 (TA Instruments) apparatus. Nondegraded and degraded scaffolds were subjected to heating and cooling cycles at 2°C/min between 20°C and 100°C. The crystallinity degree (Xc) was determined as follows:
where ΔHf is the enthalpy of fusion of the sample and ΔHf0 is the enthalpy of fusion of 100% crystalline PCL (equal to 139.5 J/g, as reported in the literature).
Size exclusion chromatography analysis
Weight average molecular weight (Mw), number average molecular weight (Mn) and polydispersity index (PDI), of the scaffolds having different pore geometries were determined through high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using a WellChrom Maxi-Star k-1000 pump (Knauer) connected to Light Scattering (LS) (PL-EMD 960), before (time T0) and after degradation (time T25). The instrument was equipped with 2 Mixed-C columns (Mixed C 5 μm; Polymer Laboratories). Chloroform was used as eluent, while monodisperse polystyrene (PS) standards (Perkin-Elmer) were used to build up the calibration curve. The chromatography parameters were determined using universal calibration, as described elsewhere (24).
Compressive mechanical tests
Compression tests were performed at a rate of 1 mm/min up to a strain value of 0.5 mm/mm using an INSTRON 5566 testing system. Both nondegraded and degraded block-shaped specimens were cut to the following dimensions: length (l) = 4.0 mm, width (w) = 4.0 mm and height (h0) = 8.0 mm. Engineering stress
while strain
Five specimens per time point were analyzed to determine the influence of the degradation process on the PCL scaffolds’ mechanical behavior.
Statistical analysis
The data from the measurements were reported as means and standard deviations and analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post hoc test (using SigmaPlot 13 software). The significance level was set at a p value of <0.05.
Results and discussion
Morphological analysis of nondegraded scaffolds
SEM micrographs were used to assess the scaffolds’ architectural features – namely, road width (RW), filament gap (FG) and layer gap (LG) (
Results from SEM analysis: images of 3D poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds with 0/90° (
Results from SEM analysis performed before the degradation process
Lay-down pattern | RW (µm) | FG (µm) | LG (µm) |
---|---|---|---|
Values are means ± standard deviation. | |||
RW = road width; FG = filament gap; LG = layer gap. | |||
0/90° | 360 ± 13 | 600 ± 18 | 159 ± 14 |
0/60/120° | 377 ± 8 | 651 ± 18 | 154 ± 8 |
0/45/90/135° | 383 ± 18 | 610 ± 18 | 160 ± 23 |
µ-CT results depicted in
Three-dimensional reconstructions obtained from micro-computed tomography (µ-CT) analysis of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds with 0/90° (
Results from micro-CT analysis: typical values of porosity, surface area to volume ratio and interconnectivity
Lay-down pattern | Porosity (%) | Surface area to volume ratio (mm-1) | Interconnectivity (%) |
---|---|---|---|
0/90° | 72.0 | 18.4 | 100 |
0/60/120° | 69.7 | 14.7 | 100 |
0/45/90/135° | 68.9 | 13.6 | 100 |
Degradation studies
Degraded PCL scaffolds were investigated in terms of WL%, SEM and µ-CT, focusing attention on the possible influence of architectural parameters on the in vitro enzyme-mediated degradation process.
The influence of these parameters has already been analyzed in earlier studies on 3D PCL scaffolds subjected to in vitro hydrolytic degradation in PBS or SBF (24, 25). The results evidenced that PCL scaffolds, incubated in both the media for 6 months, showed a WL% in the range of 0.2%-1%, independently from the geometry of the pores. Similar results (i.e., WL% in the range of 0.2%-1.2%) were achieved by Idaszek et al (31), who investigated the degradation kinetics in SBF for 3 months of composite PCL-based scaffolds obtained by a solvent casting technique.
In the present study, results for the enzymatic degradation of PCL 3D scaffolds revealed that, regardless of the scaffold pore geometry, the weight loss determined 5 days after the beginning of the degradation experiment maintained a linear and uniform trend throughout the entire period, reaching a maximum WL% of 72.2% at day 25 (
Percentage of weight loss (WL%) as a function of degradation time and pore geometry.
Brugmans et al (32) studied the enzymatic degradation of PCL scaffolds obtained by a conventional electrospinning method. They found a WL% equal to 44% by lipase treatment up to 56 hours. Murray et al (33) investigated the enzymatic degradation of graphene/PCL composites in lipase solution at 37°C for 4 days. The results revealed that both for thin films made of PCL alone and for the composites, a 50%-60% weight loss over the first 24 hours was achieved.
When comparing our data with those from preceding studies, a slower degradation kinetic was found. This observation can be explained considering that PCL systems were subjected to a superficial erosion mechanism with an initial loss of the amorphous zones located on the surface of the scaffold. In particular, Bölgen et al (34) demonstrated that the surface area to volume ratio (SA/Vol) of a material affects the rate of degradation: samples with higher SA/Vol and porosity are expected to degrade faster, due to the greater water penetration into their structures. In contrast, Athanasiou et al (35) showed that scaffolds based on poly(lactide-
In our case, as shown in
Results from SEM analysis: images of 3D poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds with 0/90° (
SEM observations and µ-CT analysis revealed that the physical features strongly changed over time as an effect of the degradation process. Despite the diameter reduction of the fibers, adhesion with the neighboring fibers was still maintained. On the other hand, as the fiber diameter decreased, FD consequently increased. This means that the increasing of FD led to an increased pore size and porosity (
Results obtained from µ-CT analysis were consistent with SEM observations, showing an increase of pore size and porosity as a consequence of the filament thinning (
Three-dimensional reconstructions obtained from micro-computed tomography (µ-CT) analysis on 3D poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) degraded scaffolds with 0/90° (
DSC analysis
DSC results are reported in
Data obtained from DSC analysis, as a function of degradation time
Degradation time (days) | 0/90° | 0/60/120° | 0/45/90/135° | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tm (°C) | ∆Hm (J/g) | Xc (%) | Tm (°C) | ∆Hm (J/g) | Xc (%) | Tm (°C) | ∆Hm (J/g) | Xc (%) | |
Results are reported as means ± standard deviation. | |||||||||
DSC = differential scanning calorimetry; Tm = melting temperature; ΔHm = melting enthalpy; Xc = crystallinity degree. | |||||||||
0 | 62.8 ± 2.1 | 33.9 ± 2.8 | 24.3 ± 2.1 | 62.8 ± 2.0 | 33.4 ± 2.9 | 24.0 ± 1.7 | 62.8 ± 2.3 | 32.6 ± 2.5 | 23.4 ± 2.2 |
5 | 63.9 ± 2.4 | 47.6 ± 3.1 | 34.1 ± 2.4 | 63.1 ± 2.2 | 49.1 ± 3.0 | 35.2 ± 2.6 | 63.9 ± 2.1 | 44.8 ± 3.3 | 32.1 ± 2.5 |
10 | 64.4 ± 2.0 | 47.0 ± 3.5 | 33.7 ± 2.3 | 64.0 ± 2.3 | 51.5 ± 3.7 | 36.9 ± 2.5 | 63.8 ± 2.3 | 47.8 ± 3.2 | 34.3 ± 2.6 |
15 | 64.8 ± 2.1 | 53.5 ± 3.9 | 38.4 ± 2.1 | 63.1 ± 2.0 | 47.0 ± 3.3 | 33.7 ± 3.0 | 63.1 ± 2.1 | 45.4 ± 3.4 | 32.5 ± 2.7 |
20 | 64.0 ± 2.5 | 47.1 ± 3.2 | 33.8 ± 2.2 | 63.8 ± 2.2 | 41.0 ± 3.1 | 29.4 ± 2.2 | 63.8 ± 2.3 | 46.7 ± 3.0 | 33.5 ± 2.3 |
25 | 61.3 ± 2.2 | 48.2 ± 3.0 | 34.6 ± 2.4 | 62.1 ± 2.1 | 46.6 ± 2.8 | 33.5 ± 2.5 | 62.1 ± 2.2 | 54.6 ± 3.1 | 33.6 ± 2.2 |
The enzymatic degradation process did not have a significant impact in the melting temperature of PCL, which remained in the range 61°C-64°C over 25 days. The same observations were reported by Murray et al (33). Furthermore, for all of the analyzed architectures, the crystallinity degree generally increased over time, with statistically relevant differences between day 0 and the successive days, except for the 0/60/120° architecture, where no significant differences were found between T0 and T20 (see
Variation of crystallinity percentage as function of time for the 3 pore geometries analyzed. Results are reported as means ± standard deviation; *p<0.01, **p<0.05 (Tukey post hoc test).
Mn and PDI values as function of degradation time, for each specimen typology
Degradation time (days) | 0/90° | 0/60/120° | 0/45/90/135° | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mn | PDI | Mn | PDI | Mn | PDI | |
Results are reported as means ± standard deviation. | ||||||
Mn = number average molecular weight; PDI = polydispersity index. | ||||||
0 | 41,300 ± 900 | 1.45 | 41,400 ± 700 | 1.42 | 41,800 ± 600 | 1.41 |
5 | 39,900 ± 800 | 1.49 | 39,000 ± 800 | 1.49 | 41,900 ± 400 | 1.44 |
10 | 38,200 ± 900 | 1.50 | 39,000 ± 700 | 1.46 | 39,300 ± 900 | 1.51 |
15 | 39,100 ± 700 | 1.45 | 37,200 ± 900 | 1.56 | 41,400 ± 800 | 1.46 |
20 | 40,300 ± 600 | 1.43 | 39,100 ± 500 | 1.47 | 39,300 ± 800 | 1.45 |
25 | 38,700 ± 800 | 1.45 | 39,200 ± 800 | 1.47 | 39,500 ± 700 | 1.43 |
SEC analysis
Variation of the number average molecular weight (Mn) as function of degradation time.
Bosworth and Downes (36) found a decrease in Mn for PCL 3D bundles (6.2%), followed by 2D fibrous mats (5.6%) and then solvent cast films (5.0%). Løvdal et al (38) investigated the mechanical properties of an electrospun PCL exposed to in vitro physiological fluids or to accelerated in vitro degradation conditions (i.e., at pH 12 for 29 days), at 37°C. Mw evaluations after 29 days showed a Mw reduction of 48% compared with that of pristine PCL, with an increased PDI (from 1.9 at day 0 to 4.5 at day 29). On the other hand, enzymatic degradation of PCL scaffolds obtained by a conventional electrospinning method by Brugmans et al (32) resulted in a significant mass loss by lipase treatment up to 56 hours, while Mw remained constant over time.
Our results showed that PCL scaffolds produced with different lay-down patterns and comparable porosities presented an almost similar degradation rate, resulting in a very slight, almost negligible Mn decrease from day 0 to day 25. Moreover, the differences observed were within the range of error associated with the SEC measurements. These observations suggested that PCL scaffolds were degraded mainly by surface erosion mechanisms with significant weight loss but almost invariable molecular weight values throughout the degradation period.
Compressive mechanical tests
Typical stress-strain curves obtained for nondegraded scaffolds with 0/90°, 0/60/120° and 0/45/90/135° lay-down patterns, compressed at a rate of 1 mm/min up to a strain value of 0.5 mm/mm.
The results confirmed that, at a selected FD, the lay-down pattern had a significant effect on the mechanical behavior of the 3D scaffolds.
Typical stress-strain curves obtained for degraded scaffolds with 0/90° (
Effect of lay-down pattern and in vitro enzymatic degradation on the mechanical properties of 3D bioextruded poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds
Degradation time (days) | 0/90° | 0/60/120° | 0/45/90/135° | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E (MPa) | σmax (MPa) | E (MPa) | σmax (MPa) | E (MPa) | σmax (MPa) | |
Scaffolds were characterized by a filament distance of 1,000 µm and different lay-down patterns (0/90°, 0/60/120° and 0/45/90/135°). Compressive modulus (E) and maximum stress (σmax) are reported as means ± standard deviation at different degradation times. | ||||||
0 | 52.1 ± 2.8 | 4.3 ± 0.4 | 44.0 ± 6.2 | 3.3 ± 0.4 | 16.2 ± 2.1 | 5.8 ± 0.7 |
5 | 29.9 ± 5.1 | 3.5 ± 0.8 | 40.0 ± 5.5 | 2.9 ± 0.9 | 8.6 ± 0.8 | 4.3 ± 0.9 |
10 | 15.1 ± 1.3 | 3.0 ± 1.4 | 15.1 ± 2.6 | 3.6 ± 0.3 | 6.6 ± 0.4 | 4.5 ± 0.6 |
15 | 9.2 ± 0.7 | 3.2 ± 0.9 | 8.5 ± 1.8 | 2.5 ± 0.7 | 5.2 ± 1.6 | 3.6 ± 0.6 |
20 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 5.0 ± 2.5 | 2.1 ± 0.7 | 8.2 ± 0.2 | 2.8 ± 1.1 |
In the results obtained, an evident reduction in the overall mechanical properties of the samples, independently of the pore geometry, was observed. This may be related to the significant mass loss caused by the enzymatic degradation mechanism. As observed in the morphological analysis, the surface erosion process led to the thinning of the filaments thus increasing the FD and porosity of the structures. In general, for all of the materials, the variation in mechanical properties as a function of FD and porosity was ascribable to the fact that the filament junctions, when subjected to compression, acted as columns. A scaffold having a higher FD, for a defined area presented a smaller number of columns. This in turn led to a decrease in the scaffold compressive modulus and maximum stress (39).
Conclusions
This study investigated the effect of pore geometry on the enzymatic degradation process carried out in vitro in 3D PCL scaffolds. The results suggest that PCL scaffolds, when immersed in PBS solution containing lipase enzyme, degrade mainly at the polymer surface, with a remarkable mass loss. Independently of the pore geometry, DSC analyses revealed an increment in the crystalline percentage, probably linked to the major susceptibility to degradation of amorphous regions of the polymer. The molecular weight remained almost constant during the entire incubation period, which confirmed the absence of bulk degradation. Furthermore, as indicated by the morphological analysis, surface erosion caused the thinning of the filaments with consequent increase in porosity and decrease of mechanical properties. As opposed to pore dimension (porosity), the internal architecture and geometry did not seem to represent a crucial parameter in the mechanism involved in the in vitro degradation of the proposed scaffolds.
Disclosures
-
2.
Chen GP Ushida T Tateishi T Scaffold design for tissue engineering. 2002 2 2 67 77 -
3.
Brown J Kumbar S Banik B Bio-instructive scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press 2016. -
5.
Sabir MI Xu X Li L A review on biodegradable polymeric materials for bone tissue engineering applications. 2009 44 21 5713 5724 -
6.
Vert M Li SM Spenlehauer G Guerin P Bioresorbability and biocompatibility of aliphatic polyesters. 1992 3 6 432 446 -
7.
Melchels FPW Domingos MAN Klein TJ Malda J Bartolo PJ Hutmacher DW Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs. 2012 37 8 1079 1104 -
8.
Bártolo P Domingos M Gloria A Gay J BioCell printing: integrated automated assembly system for tissue engineering constructs. 2011 60 1 271 274 -
9.
Lam CXF Hutmacher DW Schantz J-T Woodruff MA Teoh SH Evaluation of polycaprolactone scaffold degradation for 6 months in vitro and in vivo. 2009 90 3 906 919 -
10.
Lam CXF Savalani MM Teoh SH Hutmacher DW Dynamics of in vitro polymer degradation of polycaprolactone-based scaffolds: accelerated versus simulated physiological conditions. 2008 3 3 034108 -
11.
Pitt C Hendren RW Schindler A Woodward SC The enzymatic surface erosion of aliphatic polyesters. 1984 1 1 3 14 -
12.
Woodruff MA Hutmacher DW The return of a forgotten polymer: polycaprolactone in the 21st century. 2010 35 10 1217 1256 -
13.
Duarte AR Mano JF Reis RL Enzymatic degradation of 3D scaffolds of starch-poly(ε-caprolactone) prepared by supercritical fluid technology. 2010 95 10 2110 2117 -
14.
Peng H Ling J Liu J Zhu N Ni X Shen Z Controlled enzymatic degradation of poly(ε-caprolactone)-based copolymers in the presence of porcine pancreatic lipase. 2010 95 4 643 650 -
16.
Liu L Li S Garreau H Vert M Selective enzymatic degradations of poly(L-lactide) and poly(epsilon-caprolactone) blend films. 2000 1 3 350 359 -
17.
Mochizuki M Hirami M Structural effects on the biodegradation of aliphatic polyesters. 1997 8 4 203 209 -
18.
Fukuzaki H Yoshida M Asano M et al. Synthesis of low-molecular-weight copoly(L-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone) by direct copolycondensation in the absence of catalysts, and enzymatic degradation of the polymers. 1990 31 10 2006 2014 -
19.
Mochizuki M Hirano M Kanmuri Y Kudo K Tokiwa Y Hydrolysis of polycaprolactone fibers by lipase: effects of draw ratio on enzymatic degradation. 1995 55 2 289 296 -
20.
Gan Z Yu D Zhong Z Liang Q Jing X Enzymatic degradation of poly(ε-caprolactone)/poly(DLlactide) blends in phosphate buffer solution. 1999 40 10 2859 2862 -
21.
Gunatillake PA Adhikari R Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering. 2003 5 1 16 discussion 16. -
22.
Zhang Q Jiang Y Zhang Y Ye Z Tan W Lang M Effect of porosity on long-term degradation of poly (ε-caprolactone) scaffolds and their cellular response. 2013 98 1 209 218 -
23.
Castilla-Cortázar I Más-Estellés J Meseguer-Dueñas JM Escobar Ivirico JL Marí B Vidaurre A Hydrolytic and enzymatic degradation of a poly(ε-caprolactone) network. 2012 97 8 1241 1248 -
24.
Domingos M Chiellini F Cometa S et al. Evaluation of in vitro degradation of PCL scaffolds fabricated via BioExtrusion: Part 1: influence of the degradation environment. 2010 5 2 65 73 -
25.
Domingos M Chiellini F Cometa S et al. Evaluation of in vitro degradation of PCL scaffolds fabricated via BioExtrusion: Part 2: influence of pore size and geometry. 2011 6 3 157 165 -
26.
Domingos M Dinucci D Cometa S Alderighi M Bártolo P Chiellini F Polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via bioextrusion for tissue engineering applications. 2009 2009 1-9 -
27.
Brun F Intranuovo F Mohammadi S Domingos M Favia P Tromba B Comparison of 3D poly(ε-caprolactone) tissue engineering scaffolds produced with conventional and additive manufacturing techniques by means of quantitative analysis of SR μ-CT image. 2013 8 07 C07001 -
28.
Domingos M Chiellini F Gloria A Ambrosio L Bartolo P Chiellini E Effect of process parameters on the morphological and mechanical properties of 3D Bioextruded poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds. 2012 18 1 56 67 -
29.
Domingos M Intranuovo F Russo T et al. The first systematic analysis of 3D rapid prototyped poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds manufactured through BioCell printing: the effect of pore size and geometry on compressive mechanical behaviour and in vitro hMSC viability. 2013 5 4 045004 -
30.
Lenglet S Li S Vert M Lipase-catalysed degradation of copolymers prepared from ε-caprolactona and DL-lactide. 2009 94 4 688 692 -
31.
Idaszek J Brynk T Jaroszewicz J Vanmeert F Bruinink A Swieszkowski W Investigation of mechanical properties of porous composite scaffolds with tailorable degradation kinetics after in vitro degradation using digital image correlation. 2015 -
32.
Brugmans MC Söntjens SH Cox MA et al. Hydrolytic and oxidative degradation of electrospun supramolecular biomaterials: In vitro degradation pathways. 2015 27 21 31 -
33.
Murray E Thompson BC Sayyar S Wallace GG Enzymatic degradation of graphene/polycaprolactone materials for tissue engineering. 2015 11 71 77 -
34.
Bölgen N Menceloğlu YZ Acatay K Vargel İ Pişkin E In vitro and in vivo degradation of non-woven materials made of poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofibers prepared by electrospinning under different conditions. 2005 16 12 1537 1555 -
35.
Athanasiou KA Schmitz JP Agrawal CM The effects of porosity on in vitro degradation of polylactic acid; polyglycolic acid implants used in repair of articular cartilage. 1998 4 1 53 63 -
36.
Bosworth LA Downes S Physicochemical characterisation of degrading polycaprolactone scaffolds. 2010 95 12 2269 2276 -
37.
Arias V Olsén P Odelius K Höglund A Albertsson A-C Selective degradation in aliphatic block copolyesters by controlling the heterogeneity of the amorphous phase. 2015 6 17 3271 3282 -
38.
Løvdal A Vange J Nielsen LF Almdal K Mechanical properties of electrospun PCL scaffold under in vitro and accelerated degradation conditions. 2014 26 3 1450043. -
39.
Hutmacher DW Hoque ME Wong YS Design, fabrication and physical characterization of scaffolds made from biodegradable synthetic polymers in combination with RP systems based on melt extrusion. Berlin: Springer. 2008:261-291.
Authors
- Ferreira, Joana [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 1
- Gloria, Antonio [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2
- Cometa, Stefania [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 3
- Coelho, Jorge F.J. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 4
- Domingos, Marco [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 5, * Corresponding Author ([email protected])
Affiliations
-
Centre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Leiria - Portugal -
Institute of Polymers, Composites and Biomaterials, National Research Council of Italy, Naples - Italy -
Jaber Innovation s.r.l., Rome - Italy -
CEMUC-Chemical Engineering Department, University of Coimbra, Coimbra - Portugal -
School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester - UK -
J. Ferreira, A. Gloria and S. Cometa contributed equally to this work.
Article usage statistics
The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.