Advertisement

Do adhesive systems influence the color match of resin composites?

Abstract

Background

This in vitro study evaluated the influence of adhesive systems on the color match of a resin composite with different translucencies.

Methods

Sixty disk-shaped specimens were made with A2 and opaque A2 (OA2) shades of nanohybrid resin composite Z250 XT. Specimens of each shade (n = 30) were randomly reassigned to 3 subgroups according to adhesive system: a 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Adper Single Bond Plus), a 2-step self-etch system (Clearfil SE Bond) and a universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive). The bonding agents were applied to resin composite specimens following the manufacturers’ recommendations. Additionally, 5 disk samples of each adhesive system were prepared. Colorimetric evaluation (CIE L*a*b* system) was performed immediately after polishing the sample and application of the adhesive systems. Color changes (ΔE and ΔE00) were calculated between 2 measurements. Color coordinates L*, a* and b* of the adhesive disks were also assessed. The data obtained were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test (α = 0.05).

Results

The application of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive to the resin composite A2 shade resulted in the highest color change (p<0.01; ΔE = 3.1 ± 0.7 and ΔE00 = 1.8 ± 0.4). However, no significant difference was observed among adhesive systems when applied to the resin composite OA2 shade (p>0.05). Scotchbond Universal Adhesive revealed augmented yellowing and greening in comparison with other experimental groups.

Conclusions

The universal adhesive tested resulted in higher visually perceptible color changes when using a more translucent resin composite shade, but this was clinically acceptable.

J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2016; 14(2): e212 - e216

Article Type: ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

DOI:10.5301/jabfm.5000277

Authors

Débora D. Ritter, Rachel O. Rocha, Fabio Z.M. Soares, Tathiane L. Lenzi

Article History

Disclosures

Financial support: No grants or funding have been received for this study.
Conflict of interest: None of the authors has any financial interest related to this study to disclose.

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • Article price: Eur 36,00
  • You will be granted access to the article for 72 hours and you will be able to download any format (PDF or ePUB). The article will be available in your login area under "My PayPerView". You will need to register a new account (unless you already own an account with this journal), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.
  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal
  • Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

Authors

Affiliations

  •  Graduate Program in Dental Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria - Brazil
  •  Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria - Brazil
  •  Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria - Brazil

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.