Advertisement

Effects of annealing on the structure and magnetic properties of Fe80B20 magnetostrictive fibers

Abstract

Background

Fe80B20 amorphous alloys exhibit excellent soft magnetic properties, high abrasive resistance and outstanding corrosion resistance. In this work, Fe80B20 amorphous micro-fibers with HC of 3.33 Oe were firstly fabricated and the effects of annealing temperature on the structure and magnetic properties of the fibers were investigated.

Methods

In this study, Fe80B20 amorphous fibers were prepared by the single roller melt-spinning method. The structures of as-spun and annealed fibers were investigated by X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (PANalytical X,Pert Power) using Cu Kα radiation. The morphology of the fibers was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (HITACHI-S4800). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements of the fibers were performed on Mettler Toledo TGA/DSC1 device under N2 protection. Vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, Versalab) was used to examine the magnetic properties of the fibers. The resonance behavior of the fibers was characterized by an impedance analyzer (Agilent 4294A) with a home-made copper coil.

Results

The X-ray diffusion (XRD) patterns show that the fibers remain amorphous structure until the annealing temperature reaches 500°C. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results show that the crystallization temperature of the fibers is 449°C. The crystallization activation energy is calculated to be 221 kJ/mol using Kissinger formula. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images show that a few dendrites appear at the fiber surface after annealing. The result indicates that the coercivity HC (//) and HC (⊥) slightly increases with increasing annealing temperature until 400°C, and then dramatically increases with further increasing annealing temperature which is due to significant increase in magneto-crystalline anisotropy and magneto-elastic anisotropy. The Q value firstly increases slightly when the annealing temperature rises from room temperature (RT) to 300°C, then decreases until 400°C. Eventually, the value of Q increases to ~2000 at annealing temperature of 500°C.

Conclusions

In this study, Fe80B20 amorphous fibers with the diameter of 60 μm were prepared by the single roller melt-spinning method and annealed at 200°C, 300°C, 400°C, and 500°C, respectively. XRD results indicate that the fiber structure remains amorphous when the annealing temperature is below 400°C. α-Fe phase and Fe3B phase appear when the annealing temperature rises to 500°C, which is above the crystallization temperature of 449°C. The recrystallization activation energy is calculated to be 221 kJ/mol. The coercivity increases with increasing annealing temperature, which attributes to the increase of total anisotropy. All the as-spun and annealed fibers exhibit good resonance behavior for magnetostrictive sensors.

J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2016; 14(Suppl. 1): e56 - e61

Article Type: ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

DOI:10.5301/jabfm.5000318

OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

Authors

Qianke Zhu, Shuling Zhang, Guihong Geng, Qiushu Li, Kewei Zhang, Lin Zhang

Article History

Disclosures

Financial support: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51305290), the Shanxi Scholarship Council of China (Grant No. 2014-64), the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant No. 20131415120001), the Program for the Top Young Academic Leaders of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi (2014), the Doctoral Startup Foundation of Taiyuan University of Science and Technology (Grant No. 20132004), Shanxi Province Science Foundation for Youths (Grant No. 2015021069) and Shanxi Province Basic Research Project (Youth) (Grant No. 2014021018-4).
Conflict of interest: None of the authors has financial interest related to this study to disclose.

This article is available as full text PDF.

Download any of the following attachments:

Introduction

Magnetostrictive materials, which are able to couple magnetic energy and elastic energy, have been extensively used for a large variety of components and devices, including sensors, transducers, resonators and actuators (1, 2). Magnetostrictive materials can be classified by structure as crystalline materials and amorphous materials (3), both of which offer unique advantages depending on the applications. Crystalline magnetostrictive materials, such as Ni, Fe, Co, Permalloy (Ni80Fe20), DyFe2, TbFe2, Terfenol-D (Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.9) and Gafenol (Fe-Ga), exhibit strong anisotropy and high magnetostriction (4). Compared with crystalline materials, amorphous materials are isotropic and uniform due to the special noncrystalline form (5).

Iron-based amorphous magnetostrictive materials exhibit excellent soft magnetic properties, high abrasive resistance and outstanding corrosion resistance (6). To improve the glass formation ability, elements with low atomic weight, such as B and Si, are usually introduced into ferromagnetic metal matrix (7, 8). Due to the simple components and excellent magnetic property, Fe-B binary amorphous alloys in various forms have been fabricated and studied. Carabias et al fabricated Fe80B20 amorphous thin films with coercivity (HC) in the range of 15~35 Oe using ion beam magnetron sputtering (9). Li et al fabricated Fe80B20 amorphous films with the HC of 9.37 Oe by electrochemical deposition and made the thin films as biosensor platforms for the detection of pathogen (10). Sheng et al investigated the effect of electrochemical deposition parameters on the structures and magnetic properties of Fe80B20 amorphous films, and found that the samples prepared under 3mA/cm2 had the lowest HC of 6.81 Oe (11). Johnson et al fabricated Fe79B21 amorphous particles by sputtering and used them as biosensor platforms for the detection of pathogen (12). Ceniga fabricated Fe80B20 amorphous ribbons with HC of 7.20 Oe using spinning wheel technique (13). Fiorani studied the magnetic properties of Fe80B20 amorphous ribbons which were prepared by the melt-spinning technique (14).

Fe80B20 amorphous alloys have been fabricated and studied (15-16-17) in the forms of thin films, ribbons and bulk. However, there have been few studies on Fe80B20 fibers. The one-dimensional Fe80B20 amorphous fibers have promising potential application in the realm of sensors, magnetic shielding and anti-counterfeit label. In this paper, Fe80B20 amorphous micro-fibers with HC of 3.33 Oe are firstly fabricated by the single roller melt-spinning method. The effects of annealing temperature on the structure and magnetic properties of the alloy are studied. The important parameters to characterize the performance of sensors, including the resonance behavior and quality merit factor of Fe80B20 micro-fibers, are investigated in the present work.

Experimental procedures

The Fe80B20 alloy ingot was prepared by vacuum arc melting of a mixture of Fe (99.99 wt%) and B (99.99 wt%) (Purchased from Beijing Xingyou Trading Company) in argon atmosphere. The alloy was melted three to four times to achieve homogenization. Rapidly solidified fibers with a diameter of 60 μm were melt-spun with the wheel speed of 8.2 m/s. The fibers were annealed at 200°C, 300°C, 400°C, and 500°C, respectively, in vacuum below 3.0 × 10−4 Pa for 60 min. The structures of as-spun and annealed fibers were investigated by X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (PANalytical X,Pert Power) using Cu Kα radiation. The morphology of the fibers was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (HITACHI-S4800). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements of the fibers were performed on Mettler Toledo TGA/DSC1 device under N2 protection at the heating rate of 10°C/min, 30°C/min and 60°C/min, respectively. Vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, Versalab) was used to examine the magnetic properties of the fibers. The resonance behavior of the fibers was characterized by an impedance analyzer (Agilent 4294A) with a home-made copper coil (10 mm in length) as shown in Figure 1. The impedance analyzer was connected with the two ends of the copper coil which was wound on a glass tube with an inner diameter of 0.5 mm. Before characterization, a fiber sample was put inside the coil with its axial direction in parallel to the glass tube axis. The impedance analyzer was an AC current source and swept over frequency through the coil. As a result, an AC magnetic field along the glass tube axis direction was obtained so that the magnetic fiber was forced to vibrate longitudinally inside the coil due to the magnetostriction effect and resulted in a change in the total impedance of the coil + fiber with frequency. Particularly, the change was significant when the sweeping frequency was near the natural/resonant frequency of the fiber so that the resonant behavior of the fiber can be easily characterized. Additional experimental details can be found elsewhere (11).

Impedance analyzer for characterizing the resonance behavior of the fiber.

Results and discussion

The XRD results of as-spun and annealed Fe80B20 fibers are shown in Figure 2. Clearly, a broad diffraction peak, indicating the amorphous nature of the structure, was observed in the pattern of the as-spun fiber and the fibers annealed at 200°C, 300°C and 400°C, respectively. For the fiber annealed at 500°C, the XRD pattern shows the characteristic peak of α-Fe phase at 2θ = 43° and BFe3 compound phase at 2θ = 45°. The result is in agreement with that of the Fe80B20 amorphous ribbons (18).

X-ray diffusion (XRD) patterns of Fe80B20 fibers annealed at different temperatures.

The SEM images of the Fe80B20 fibers are shown in Figure 3. The surface of the as-spun fiber is pretty smooth, and only small spots of precipitation can be observed as shown in Figure 3A. However, the annealing treatment at 200oC results in some dendrites on the fiber surface (Fig. 3B), the structure of which is believed to be Fe3B (19). A further increase in annealing temperature leads to bigger dendrites, which is due to the increasing precipitation and accumulation of Fe3B. The annealing treatment at 500oC produces both dendrites and cubic particles, as shown in Figure 3E. The appearance of Fe3B phase is due to the enrichment of Boron, which is the result of precipitation of α-Fe phase.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of Fe80B20 alloy fibers: (A) as-spun and annealed for 60 minutes at (B) 200oC, (C) 300oC, (D) 400oC, (E) 500oC.

Figure 4 shows the DSC curves of the Fe80B20 fibers measured under flowing nitrogen gas at a heating rate of 60°C/min from room temperature. Exothermic peaks (TP) at 449°C are observed for the fibers annealed below 400°C but no exothermic peak (TP) appears for the fibers annealed at 500°C. By referring to the XRD results, it can be noted that the peak represents a crystallization process. To further calculate the crystallization activation energy, the Kissinger formula is used (20):

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves of Fe80B20 fibers annealed at different temperatures.

In [ β T p 2 ] = E R 1 T p +  constant

where E is activation energy; R is the gas constant; β is the heating rate; TP is the peak value. The activation energy of fibers is calculated based on three values of TP, which are obtained at the heating rate of 10, 30 and 60oC/min, respectively. Based on the Kissinger formula, the activation energy is obtained as 221 kJ/mol, which is close to the value for Fe75Si10B15 amorphous ribbons (21).

Figure 5 shows the hysteresis loops (M-H) of as-spun Fe80B20 amorphous fibers, where II and ⊥ represent the applied field H parallel or perpendicular to the fiber axis, respectively. Although the as-spun fibers have amorphous structure, a significant difference between the two M-H loops is observed. This is due to the shape anisotropy and the easy magnetization direction along the fiber axis. The HC (II) and HC (⊥) of as-spun fibers are found at 3.33 Oe and 12.61 Oe, respectively.

Normalized hysteresis loop of the as-spun Fe80B20 fiber.

In comparison, the magnetic properties of Fe80B20 amorphous alloys in the forms of thin films, ribbons, bulk and as-spun fibers are summarized in Table I. It can be seen that the HC (II) of the as-spun fiber is higher than that of the bulk but lower than that of the thin film and ribbon, while the Mr/Ms of the fibers is the lowest, which is due to the different shape anisotropy and magneto-elastic anisotropy.

Comparison of HC and Mr/Ms of Fe80B20 alloys in different forms

Thin film (11) Ribbon (13) Bulk (15) As-spun fiber
HC (Oe) 6.81 7.20 0.08 3.33
Mr/Ms 0.15 0.21 0.51 0.08

The dependence of coercivity HC (II) and HC (⊥) on the annealing temperature is obtained from the hysteresis loop of fibers and plotted in Figure 6. The result indicates that the coercivity HC (II) and HC (⊥) slightly increases with the increase of annealing temperature below 449oC (the crystallization temperature), which is the result of the increase in total anisotropy (i.e., magneto-elastic anisotropy, shape anisotropy, and magneto-crystalline anisotropy). The intra-structure relaxation (22) and constant magneto-crystalline anisotropy due to the same amorphous structure below crystallization temperature, lead to the fact that there is almost no variation in shape anisotropy. Therefore, it is believed that the increase in coercivity is caused by the increasing saturation magnetostriction which results in larger magneto-elastic anisotropy. When the annealing temperature rises from 400 to 500°C, there is a dramatic increase of HC (II) from 3.33 to 12.61 Oe, and HC (⊥) from 21.61 to 61.52 Oe, which is due to the significant increase in magneto-crystalline anisotropy and magneto-elastic anisotropy resulting from crystallization of the fibers at 449°C.

Coercivity of as-spun Fe80B20 fiber and annealed fibers.

Typical resonance behavior of an as-spun Fe80B20 micro-fiber is shown in Figure 7A. Characteristic/peak frequency of 630 kHz is observed in the real part of impedance spectrum, showing that the Fe80B20 fiber is capable of working as a resonator under magnetic field for sensor application. The quality merit factor (Q) is an important parameter to characterize the performance of an acoustic sensor. This factor is defined as:

(A) Resonance behavior of as-spun Fe80B20 fibers; (B) Q values of the fibers with different annealing temperatures.

Q = E 1 E 2

where E1 is the energy stored in a vibration cycle and E2 is the energy loss in one vibration cycle. Here, the value of Q is calculated as the ratio of characteristic frequency to the width at half peak height in the real part of impedance spectrum.

Figure 7B shows the Q value of samples treated at different annealing temperatures. It can be seen that the Q value increases slightly with increasing annealing temperature until the annealing temperature reaches 400°C. On the one hand, the hysteresis loss increases due to the increase of HC and the eddy-current loss increases due to the decrease in resistivity caused by the reduction of defects. On the other hand, the elastic loss decreases due to the release of intrinsic stress. Based on the results, it can be noted that the latter dominates the effect on Q.

When the annealing temperature rises from 300°C to 400°C, the Q value decreases abruptly. It is probably because the intrinsic stress has already fully disappeared when the fibers are annealed at 300°C. In other words, there is no further release of intrinsic stress or reduction of elastic loss when the fibers are annealed at 400°C. At the same time, the hysteresis loss and the eddy-current loss continue to increase with increasing annealing temperature. In addition, abnormal eddy-current loss increases because of the magnetic domain growth. In such cases, the total loss increases which causes the decrease of Q value.

However, when the annealing temperature reaches 500°C, the value of Q dramatically increases to ~2000, which is far higher than that of the commercial product Metglas 2826 MB (~1000) (23). This is because the abnormal eddy-current loss decrease and thus E2 significant decrease due to the fragmentation of magnetic domain caused by the crystallization when the annealing temperature reaches 500°C.

Conclusion

In this study, Fe80B20 amorphous fibers with the diameter of 60 μm were prepared by the single roller melt-spinning method and annealed at 200°C, 300°C, 400°C, and 500°C, respectively. XRD results indicate that the fiber structure remains amorphous when the annealing temperature is below 400°C. α-Fe phase and Fe3B phase appear when the annealing temperature rises to 500°C, which is above the crystallization temperature of 449°C. The recrystallization activation energy is calculated to be 221 kJ/mol using Kissinger formula. The coercivity increases with increasing annealing temperature, which attributes to the increase of total anisotropy. The coercivity of as-spun Fe80B20 fibers is lower than those of Fe80B20 thin films and ribbons but higher than bulk, which is mainly due to the shape anisotropy. All the as-spun and annealed fibers exhibit good resonance behavior. The Q value firstly increases slightly with the annealing temperature increasing from RT to 300°C. It then decreases when the annealing temperature increases from 300°C to 400°C. Eventually, it increases to ~2000 at annealing temperature of 500oC.

Disclosures

Financial support: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51305290), the Shanxi Scholarship Council of China (Grant No. 2014-64), the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (Grant No. 20131415120001), the Program for the Top Young Academic Leaders of Higher Learning Institutions of Shanxi (2014), the Doctoral Startup Foundation of Taiyuan University of Science and Technology (Grant No. 20132004), Shanxi Province Science Foundation for Youths (Grant No. 2015021069) and Shanxi Province Basic Research Project (Youth) (Grant No. 2014021018-4).
Conflict of interest: None of the authors has financial interest related to this study to disclose.
References
  • 1. Hummel RE Electronic properties of materials. 3rd ed. New York: Springer Verlag; 2001. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86538-1 Google Scholar
  • 2. Lacheisserie E Magnetostriction: theory and applications of magnetoelasticity. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1993 Google Scholar
  • 3. Engdahl G Handbook of giant magnetostrictive materials. 1st ed. New York: Academic Press; 2000 Google Scholar
  • 4. Claeyssen F Lhermet N Le Letty R Bouchilloux P Actuators, transducers and motors based on giant magnetostrictive materials. J Alloys Compd 1997 258 61 73 Google Scholar
  • 5. Jiles DC Recent advances and future directions in magnetic materials. Acta Mater 2003 51 19 5907 5939 Google Scholar
  • 6. Inoue A Bulk amorphous and nanocrystalline alloys with high functional properties. Mater Sci Eng A 2001 304 1 10 Google Scholar
  • 7. Kolano-Burian A Wlodarczyk P Hawelek L et al. Impact of cobalt content on the crystallization pattern in the Finemet-type ribbons. J Alloys Compd 2014 615 Suppl 1 S203 S207 Google Scholar
  • 8. Li S Xie GQ Louzguine-Luzgin DV Sato M Inoue A Nanocrystallization of Fe73Si7B17Nb3 metallic glass induced by microwave treatment in magnetic field of a single mode 915 MHz applicator. J Alloys Compd 2012 536 Suppl 1 S315 S318 Google Scholar
  • 9. Carabias I Martinez A Garcia MA et al. Magnetostrictive thin films prepared by RF sputtering. J Magn Magn Mater 2005 823 Part 2 290 291 Google Scholar
  • 10. Li SQ Horikawa S Park MK Chai YT Vodyanoy VJ Chin BA Amorphous metallic glass biosensors. Intermetallics 2012 30 80 85 Google Scholar
  • 11. Sheng ZZ Zhang MG Cheng ZY Chai YS Chen FH Effects of electrochemical deposition parameters on the structure and magnetostrictive effect of Fe-B thin films. J Magn Magn Mater Dev 2013 2 9 Google Scholar
  • 12. Johnson ML Wan JH Huang SC Cheng Z-Y Petrenko VA Kim DJ A wireless biosensor using microfabricated phage-interfaced magnetoelastic particles. Sensor Actuat A 2008 144 1 38 47 Google Scholar
  • 13. Ceniga L Internal stresses and Barkhausen noise of Fe80B20 amorphous alloys treated by annealing and hydrogenation-dehydrogenation processes. Mater Sci Eng B 2001 79 2 154 158 Google Scholar
  • 14. Fiorani D Malizia F Ronconi F Vittori Antisari M Magnetic properties of partially crystallized Fe80B20 amorphous alloys. J Magn Magn Mater 1996 159 157 Google Scholar
  • 15. Chou CP Davis LA Narasimhan MC Elastic constants of metallic glasses. Scr Metall 1977 11 5 417 423 Google Scholar
  • 16. Vavassori P Ronconi F Traldi M Puppin E Surface crystallization and frequency dependence of AC coercivity in Fe80B20 amorphous alloy. J Magn Magn Mater 1998 127 177 Google Scholar
  • 17. Hasegawa R O’Handley RC Tanner LE Ray R Kavesh S Magnetization, magnetic anisotropy, and domain patterns of Fe80B20 glass. Appl Phys Lett 1976 29 3 219 Google Scholar
  • 18. Greer AL Crystallisation kinetics of Fe80B20 glass. Acta Metall 1982 30 1 171 192 Google Scholar
  • 19. Walter JL Bartram SF Russell RR Crystallization of the Amorphous Alloys Fe50Ni30B20 and Fe80B20. Metall Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci 1978 9A 6 803 814 Google Scholar
  • 20. Altlizar P Valenzuela R Avrami and Kissinger theories for crystallization of metallic amorphous alloys. Mater Lett 1991 11 3-4 101 104 Google Scholar
  • 21. Nakagawa K Kanadani T Mori Y Ishii Y The effect of the jetting temperature on the fabrications of rapidly sol-idified Fe-Si-B systems alloys using single roller melt spinning. J Inst Met 2009 73 10 764 767 Google Scholar
  • 22. Fu JL Yan ZJ Xu Y Fan XL Xue DS Effects of annealing temperature on structure and magnetic properties of amorphous Fe61Co27P12 nanowire arrays. J Phys Chem Solids 2007 68 12 2221 2226 Google Scholar
  • 23. Li SQ Cheng ZY Nonuniform mass detection using magnetostrictive biosensors operatingunder multiple harmonic resonance modes. J Appl Phys 2010 107 11 114514 Google Scholar

Authors

Affiliations

  • School of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan - China
  • School of Material of Science and Engineering, Beifang Nationalities University, Yinchuan - China
  • Materials Research and Education Center, Auburn University, Auburn, AL - USA

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.