Advertisement

Thermal conductivity of different colored compomers

Abstract

Background

Compomers are mostly used in primary dentition. The thermal conductivity properties of traditional or colored compomers have not been investigated in detail so far. The aim of this in vitro study was to assess and compare the thermal conductivities of traditional and colored compomers.

Method

Two sets of compomers – namely, Twinky Star (available in berry, lemon, green, silver, blue, pink, gold and orange shades) and Dyract Extra (available in B1, A3 and A2 shades) – were included in this study. All of the traditional and colored compomers were applied to standard molds and polymerized according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Three samples were prepared from each compomer. Measurements were conducted using a heat conduction test setup, and the coefficient of heat conductivity was calculated for each material. The heat conductivity coefficients were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Duncan tests. Uncertainty analysis was also performed on the calculated coefficients of heat conductivity.

Results

Statistically significant differences were found (p<0.05) between the thermal conductivity properties of the traditional and colored compomers examined. Among all of the tested compomers, the silver shade compomer exhibited the highest coefficient of heat conductivity (p<0.05), while the berry shade exhibited the lowest coefficient (p<0.05). Uncertainty analyses revealed that 6 out of 11 samples showed significant differences.

Conclusions

The silver shade compomer should be avoided in deep cavities. The material properties could be improved for colored compomers.

J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2017; 15(4): e362 - e368

Article Type: ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

DOI:10.5301/jabfm.5000349

Authors

Cigdem Guler, Ali Keles, Mehmet S. Guler, Sendogan Karagoz, Ömer N. Cora, Gul Keskin

Article History

Disclosures

Financial support: No grants or funding have been received for this study.
Conflict of interest: None of the authors has any financial interest related to this study to disclose.

This article is available as full text PDF.

  • If you are a Subscriber, please log in now.

  • Article price: Eur 36,00
  • You will be granted access to the article for 72 hours and you will be able to download any format (PDF or ePUB). The article will be available in your login area under "My PayPerView". You will need to register a new account (unless you already own an account with this journal), and you will be guided through our online shop. Online purchases are paid by Credit Card through PayPal.
  • If you are not a Subscriber you may:
  • Subscribe to this journal
  • Unlimited access to all our archives, 24 hour a day, every day of the week.

Authors

Affiliations

  • Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu - Turkey
  • Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun - Turkey
  • Department of Machinery and Metal Technologies, Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Ordu University, Ordu - Turkey
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ataturk University, Erzurum - Turkey
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon - Turkey
  • Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep - Turkey

Article usage statistics

The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.

No supplementary material is available for this article.