Abstract
Introduction: Microwave and water bath postpolymerization have been suggested as methods to improve the mechanical properties of heat and autopolymerizing acrylic resins. However, the effects of autoclave heating on the fracture properties of autopolymerizing acrylic resins have not been investigated. Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of various autoclave postpolymerization methods on the fracture properties of 3 different autopolymerizing acrylic resins. Methods: Forty-two specimens of 3 different autopolymerizing acrylic resins (Orthocryl, Paladent RR and Futurajet) were fabricated (40x8x4mm), and each group was further divided into 6 subgroups (n=7). Control group specimens remained as processed (Group 1). The first test group was postpolymerized in a cassette autoclave at 135°C for 6 minutes and the other groups were postpolymerized in a conventional autoclave at 130°C using different time settings (5, 10, 20 or 30 minutes). Fracture toughness was then measured with a three-point bending test. Data were analyzed by ANOVA followed by the Duncan test (α=0.05). Results: The fracture toughness of Orthocryl and Paladent-RR acrylic resins significantly increased following conventional autoclave postpolymerization at 130°C for 10 minutes (P>.05). However, the fracture toughness of autoclave postpolymerized Futurajet was not significantly different than its control specimens (P>.05). The fracture toughness of Futurajet was significantly less than Paladent RR and Orthocryl specimens when autoclaved at 130°C for 10 minutes. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, it can be suggested that autoclave postpolymerization is an effective method for increasing the fracture toughness of tested autoploymerized acrylic resins.
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2012; 10(1): 37 - 42
Article Type: ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
DOI:10.5301/JABFM.2012.9271
Authors
Rukiye Durkan, Ayhan Gürbüz, Burak Yilmaz, M. Birol Özel, Bora Bagis
Article History
- • Accepted on 17/05/2011
- • Accepted on 17/05/2011
- • Available online on 09/02/2012
- • Available online on 23/06/2012
- • Published online on 26/06/2012
This article is available as full text PDF.
Authors
- Durkan, Rukiye
[PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon - Turkey
- Gürbüz, Ayhan
[PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara - Turkey
- Yilmaz, Burak
[PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
Division of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, The Ohio State University College of Dentistry, Columbus, OH - USA
- Özel, M. Birol
[PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon - Turkey
- Bagis, Bora
[PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon - Turkey
Article usage statistics
The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.