Abstract
Over recent years, there has been a growing interest in multilayer scaffolds fabrication approaches. In fact, functionally graded scaffolds (FGSs) provide biological and mechanical functions potentially similar to those of native tissues. Based on the final application of the scaffold, there are different properties (physical, mechanical, biochemical, etc.) which need to gradually change in space. Therefore, a number of different technologies have been investigated, and often combined, to customize each region of the scaffolds as much as possible, aiming at achieving the best regenerative performance.
In general, FGSs can be categorized as bilayered or multilayered, depending on the number of layers in the whole structure. In other cases, scaffolds are characterized by a continuous gradient of 1 or more specific properties that cannot be related to the presence of clearly distinguished layers. Since each traditional approach presents peculiar advantages and disadvantages, FGSs are good candidates to overcome the limitations of current treatment options. In contrast to the reviews reported in the literature, which usually focus on the application of FGS, this brief review provides an overview of the most common strategies adopted to prepare FGS.
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2017; 15(2): e107 - e121
Article Type: REVIEW
DOI:10.5301/jabfm.5000332
Authors
Roberto Scaffaro, Francesco Lopresti, Andrea Maio, Fiorenza Sutera, Luigi BottaArticle History
- • Accepted on 29/09/2016
- • Available online on 16/12/2016
- • Published online on 26/04/2017
Disclosures
This article is available as full text PDF.
Functionally graded scaffolds for tissue engineering
Tissue engineering combines the knowledge of materials science and bioengineering to develop structures able to substitute for and restore the normal function of injured or diseased tissues. In this context, polymeric 3-dimensional (3D) scaffolds are widely investigated as temporary cell guidance structures during tissue restoration (1-2-3).
It is well known that living tissues are characterized by a gradient of different cell types, extracellular matrix (ECM) morphology, and mineral quantities and composition, as well as mechanical responses. Designing functionally graded scaffolds (FGSs) requires the examination of the hierarchical structure of native tissues from the microbiological level up to the tissue structure to recognize and exploit the relationships between structure and function. The main challenge of this strategy lies in finding methods able to customize, as much as possible, each region of the scaffolds to achieve the best regenerative performance, taking into account both tissue and patient requirements (4).
For instance, the cartilage–bone interface, schematically shown in
Scheme of the structural gradient occurring in the ostechondral junction. Four different zones can be observed based on the cell morphology, matrix composition, collagen fibril orientation and mechanical properties. (i) Superficial zone has fewer chondrocytes and collagen fibers parallel to the joint surface. (ii) Intermediate (middle) zone has larger collagen fibers interlacing with each other. (iii) Deep zone has tightly packed fibers perpendicular to the joint surface, active cells and lower water content. The deep zone also includes the tidemark (basophilic line which straddles the boundary between uncalcified and calcified cartilage). (iv) Calcified zone or “subchondral bone” is where the transition from soft to stiff subchondral bone occurs, responsible for firmly attaching the noncalcified cartilage to the underlying subchondral bone. Reproduced from (13) with permission from Springer.
Cell migration and differentiation can be affected by the presence of a gradient of physical or chemical properties on the surface of the culture substrate, in particular if the scaffold is able to mimic the inherent gradient property of the native tissue (7). Apart from biological characteristics, scaffolds need to satisfy specific mechanical requirements. In particular, the scaffolds’ mechanical properties should be close to those of the native tissues that need to be restored (8). Furthermore, adequate mechanical properties induce stress transmission closely matching those of surrounding native tissue thus stimulating the regeneration (9). In this context, scaffold presenting graded mechanical properties are potentially able to reproduce the biomechanical properties of living graded tissue better than monolayered scaffold. For example, the compressive modulus of superficial, middle and deep zones of cartilage is 0.08, 2.10 and 320.0 MPa, respectively, indicating the notable differences in stiffness of this tissue (10). The compressive modulus of subchondral bone (5.7 GPa) is higher than that of cartilage (11-12-13). Furthermore, a gradient of the mechanical properties in a cell substrate can lead to cell movement (mechanotaxis).
Materials involved in tissue engineering are usually natural or synthetic polymers, or inorganic materials such as metals and ceramics (14-15-16-17). Among these, biodegradable polymers have attracted much attention due to their unique chemophysical characteristics. For instance, natural biopolymer such as COL, hyaluronic acid (HA), chitosan (CS) and alginate are widely used in the preparation of scaffold for tissue engineering since they offer high biocompatibility in terms of cell adhesion and proliferation (18-19-20-21-22-23-24-25-26-27-28). On the other hand, the mechanical properties of natural biopolymers are usually weaker if compared with synthetic polymers or inorganic biomaterials (1), with some exceptions such as silk fibroin (29). Among the widely different types of synthetic polymers used in tissue engineering applications, the most relevant are polylactic acid (PLA), polycaprolactone (PCL), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), polyethylene glycol (PEG) and biodegradable polyurethane (PU) (30-31-32-33-34-35-36-37-38). In general, they offer a wider range of chemophysical properties, controlled molecular weight distribution and easy processability (39-40-41-42). At the same time, several synthetic polymers show hydrophobic behavior and are often surface modified or blended with hydrophilic polymers to enhance cell adhesion and growth (43-44-45-46-47-48-49).
In general, FGS fabrication strategies can be categorized as (i) bilayered or (ii) multilayered, depending on the number of layers making up the whole structure. In other cases, scaffolds are characterized by a continuous gradient of one or more specific properties that cannot be related to the presence of clearly distinguished layers. Furthermore, FGS can be multiphasic (15, 50, 51) or monophasic (43, 46, 52) since a single material can also be used to produce multilayered scaffolds if significant variations in physical properties among the layers (i.e., porosity, pore size or pore shape) are present.
Bilayer structures are usually intended for scaffolds designed for osteochondral repairs. In fact, osteochondral defects involve both bone and cartilage as well as their interface. Thus, the possibility of tuning specific tailored properties in different regions of the scaffold by just integrating 2 layers with different chemophysical properties is a key challenge that can lead to superior osteochondral repair, compared with monolayered scaffolds.
Multilayer systems are characterized by 3 or more layers in a single structure to achieve a gradient of properties such as pore size (4, 43, 46, 53-54-55-56-57), pore shape (58), mineral content (24, 59, 60) or chemical cues (15, 56, 61-62-63-64-65-66-67). Multilayer scaffolds are usually designed for osteochondral repairs (15, 43, 46, 56, 57, 60), but they were also developed for cranial (67), vascular (68), human dermis (54) and tendon–bone interface (62) regeneration.
The principal alternatives to bilayer and multilayer scaffolds are the continuous gradient scaffolds. These scaffolds may overcome the problem of inefficient binding between different layers while displaying a continuous change in terms of material composition, pore architecture or growth factor types.
Several recent reviews have focused on describing FGSs and their common applications for osteochondral and other interface tissues (1, 13, 52, 69-70-71-72-73-74-75-76-77-78). The present review, far from reconsidering all of the FGS applications, will provide a brief overview of the main strategies adopted by the scientific community to fabricate bilayered, multilayered and continuous FGS.
Bilayer structures
Several microtechnologies and nanotechnologies have been adopted for the development of both homogenous and heterogeneous bilayer systems. The desired porosity can be achieved either by creating voids throughout a bulk monolith (via particulate leaching, gas foaming or freeze-drying) or by directly fabricating a fibrous mat via electrospinning or computer-aided techniques. Of course, the assembly of different layers into a heterogeneous scaffold may involve a combination of the aforementioned approaches, as summarized in
Summary of key features of FGS obtained by bilayer approaches
FGS system | Technique | Assembling method | Graded property | Target tissue | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BG = bioactive glass; COL = collagen; CS = chitosan; FGS = functionally graded scaffolds; HA = hyaluronic acid; HAp = hydroxyapatite; NA = not available; PCL = polycaprolactone; PGA = polyglycolic acid; PLA = polylactic acid; PLGA = poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); PU = polyurethane; PVA = polyvinyl alcohol; TCP = tricalcium phosphate. | |||||
PLGA | Gelatin-leaching | Solution-casting | Pore size | Cartilage | (79) |
Hydrogel | Freeze-dry | Overlapped | Grow factor type | Subchondral | (83) |
Cell/Cell, alginate | Liophilization/Freeze-dry | Solvent-assembling | Porosity | Cartilage | (84) |
PCL, HAp/PCL, mannitol | Sugar-leaching | Solution-casting | Mineral type | Osteochondral | (80) |
PLGA | NaCl-leaching | Solution-casting | Pore size | Osteochondral | (81) |
PLGA, PGA fibers/PLGA, bioglass, CaP, PGA fibers | NA | Solvent-assembling (gluing) | Additive type and concentration | Cartilage | (85) |
CS, COL/BG, COL | Solvent-casting/Freeze-dry | Cross-linking agents | Bulk chemical | Osteochondral | (86) |
HAp, COL/allogeneic sterilized bone, COL | Freeze-dry | COL gluing | Bulk chemical, structural | Osteochondral | (87) |
COL/PLGA, COL | NaCl-leaching/Freeze-dry | Cross-linking | Bulk chemical, pore size | Osteochondral | (82) |
Gelatin, chondroitin sulphate, sodium hyaluronate/gelatin and ceramic bovine bone | Freeze-dry | Cross-linking | Bulk chemical, structural | Cartilage and subchondral | (88) |
PCL, HAp/COL, HAp | Centrifugation/Freeze-dry | NA | Structural and HAp content | Graded tissues | (89) |
HA/HA, poly-L-lysine | Freeze-dry/Spray-assisted layer-by-layer | Spray-assisted layer-by-layer | Bulk chemical, structural | Dermal | (90) |
PLGA/PLGA microspheres | Gas-foaming/NaCl-leaching/Freeze-dry | Cross-linking | Structural/additive type and concentration | Osteochondral | (91) |
PLA/PCL | NaCl-leaching | Compression-molding | Bulk chemical, pore size, mechanical | Interface tissues | (50) |
PLA/PLA, HAp | NaCl-leaching | Compression-molding | Mineral presence, pore size | Osteochondral | (93) |
PLGA | Solid free-form | Image-based design | Material composition, shapes, porosity and mechanical properties | Articular cartilage | (94) |
PCL/fibrin glue | Rapid prototypings | Image-based design | Material composition, shapes, porosity | Osteochondral | (95) |
HAp/PLA | Solid free-form | Image-based design | Material composition, shapes, porosity and mechanical properties | Osteochondral | (96) |
PLA | Electrospinning | NA | Fiber structure | (97, 98) | |
PVA, HAp/PCL-HAp | Electrospinning | NA | Bulk chemical | Osteochondral | (99) |
PLA/COL | Electrospinning/Freeze-dry | Overlapping 2 layers before freeze-drying | Material composition, shapes, porosity | Osteochondral | (100) |
PU | Foaming reaction (DABCO) | NA | Porosity | Oromaxillary Bone | (38) |
PCL/HAp | NaCl-leaching/CO2 foaming | Overlapping 2 different samples before foaming | Porosity and pore size | Osteochondral | (101) |
CS-HA hydrogel/PCL | Freeze-dry/Electrospinning | Overlapping 2 layers before freeze-drying | Material composition, shapes, porosity | Ligament | (102) |
HAp/CS | Sacrifical PU/Freeze-dry | Overlapping two layers before freeze-drying | Material composition, shapes, porosity | Osteochondral | (103) |
PLGA/PLGA, TCP | NaCl leaching | Solvent-merging | TCP content | Osteochondral | (104) |
Solvent-based techniques
Several researchers have fabricated bilayer scaffolds by particulate leaching and by freeze-drying techniques, in particular for osteochondral defects. The bilayer architecture offered good mechanical stability and maintained structural integrity while providing a porous architecture that supported cell ingrowth in chondrogenic and osteogenic layers, together with integration with the surrounding environment.
Among these researchers, Qi et al incorporated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into a bilayer PLGA scaffold obtained by leaching gel microspheres. The bilayer system was prepared by solution casting of PLGA in a mold containing gel particles with 2 different size distributions (79). Similarly, Giannoni et al realized highly porous PCL scaffolds combining solvent-casting and particulate-leaching. The porogen agents were sucrose crystals for the bone-facing layer which contains hydroxyapatite (HAp) and mannitol crystals for the cartilage-facing layer (80). Duan et al investigated in vivo the effect of pore size in bilayered PLGA scaffolds fabricated by solvent-casting of PLGA filled with sodium chloride (NaCl) and subsequent water-leaching (81). The pore size distribution of each layer was controlled by sieving the NaCl particles in 2 different ranges. The solvent-casting and NaCl leaching technique was adopted by Chen et al to prepare a bilayer scaffold composed of biodegradable synthetic and naturally derived polymers. The upper layer of the scaffold for cartilage engineering was a COL sponge, while the lower layer for bone engineering was a composite sponge made of PLGA and naturally derived COL (82).
Reem et al demonstrated the enhanced regenerative properties of a hydrogel designed for subchondral repairs obtained by freeze-drying. The scaffold was filled in the upper and lower regions with 2 different grow factor types to induce the differentiation of MSCs (83). Martínez Ávila et al fabricated a bilayer bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) scaffold for auricular cartilage composed of a dense nanocellulose layer joined with a macroporous layer of BNC/alginate (84). The bilayer scaffold was assembled by solvent interdiffusion among the layers before the freeze-drying step. Niederauer et al prepared 4 types of PLGA-based bilayered implants. To vary stiffness and chemical properties of the constructs, they used different additives at different concentrations (85). In this case, the layers were assembled by using a solvent as a glue.
Bi et al developed a heterogenous bilayer scaffold for osteochondral regeneration by solvent-casting and freeze-drying. They used a CS-COL composite for the chondral phase and a bioactive glass-COL for the osseous region. The interlayer adhesion was ensured by interconnecting the COL via cross-linking agents (86). For the same purpose, Schleicher et al fabricated bilayer scaffolds was made up of either HAp/COL or allogeneic sterilized bone/COL via solvent-casting plus freeze-drying. The integration of the 2 layers was ensured by the COL that acted as a glue for the different phases. The scaffolds’ efficiency was evaluated in a sheep model, and the sample based on allogeneic sterilized bone/COL displayed more stability and higher capacity to be integrated in the short term (87). A 3D heterogeneous bilayer scaffold was prepared by Deng et al to repair large defects in rabbit joints (88). The scaffold consisted of 2 distinct and integrated layers corresponding to the cartilage and bone tissue. The upper layer, made with gelatin, chondroitin sulphate and sodium hyaluronate, and the lower layer, which consisted of gelatin and ceramic bovine bone, were assembled using cross-linking agents. The scaffolds investigated showed an encouraging efficacy in repairing large defects in rabbit joints.
Marrella et al adopted a procedure combining centrifugation and freeze-drying techniques, to prepare porous scaffold made by PCL and COL type I (89). A functional gradient was combined to the morphological one by adding HAp powders to mimic the bone mineral phase. Results showed that 3D bioactive morphologically and chemically graded grafts could be properly designed and realized, in agreement with the theoretical model. Monteiro et al presented a novel approach to developing bilayer scaffolds for skin tissue engineering, able to combine certain specific properties of the epidermis and the dermis (90). They used the spray-assisted layer-by-layer assembly technique to deposit a polyelectrolyte multilayer film made by HA and poly-L-lysine on a porous HA scaffold. The bilayer film promoted cell adhesion, thus contributing to regeneration of the epidermal barrier functions of skin.
Reyes et al prepared a bilayer scaffold consisting of PLGA and alginate for the sustained delivery of 2 different growth factors. A bone-orientated, porous PLGA cylinder was prepared via gas foaming, overlaid with PLGA microspheres containing various amounts of grow factors, and dispersed in an alginate matrix via cross-linking and subsequent freeze-drying. Release kinetics and tissue distributions were determined by in vitro and in vivo experiments (91).
The solvent-based approach presents several issues related to toxic solvent utilization, in terms of solvent removal and environmental risks (92). Nevertheless, it allows the achieving of versatile structures by tailoring the concentration and localization of additives, such as growth factors, enzymes and proteins, via chemical reactions in solution. Furthermore, among the techniques used to create voids, freeze-drying permits us to achieve extremely high degrees of porosity (37).
Melt-based approaches
Scaffaro et al prepared a heterogeneous bilayered scaffold in the melt. The authors combined melt-mixing, compression-molding and particulate-leaching to integrate a PLA layer with pores around 100 µm with a PCL layer with pores around 20 µm. NaCl sieved in 2 fractions (0-40 µm and 90-110 µm) was used as template. The tunable pore architecture combined with the different chemophysical properties of the 2 polymers in a heterogeneous bilayered scaffold presenting well-adhered layers, as demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis (
(
Basically, the main advantages related to the melt-based approach refer to the absence of toxic solvents and to the possibility of tuning the porosity and pore size by simply tailoring the size and concentration of porogen agents. However, this technique presents some drawbacks, such as the difficulty of achieving complex structures or the impossibility of fabricating continuously graded structures, as will be discussed in further paragraphs below.
Computer-aided techniques
Bilayer scaffolds of appropriate geometry can be realized by computer-aided techniques, such as rapid prototyping, image-based design (IBD) and solid free-form fabrication (SFF). Sherwood et al developed a composite PLGA scaffold using the TheriForm™ printing process where the external and internal architectures were created via IBD. The versatility of the technology allowed for varying the material composition, shapes, porosity and mechanical properties throughout the scaffold structure (94). Shao et al assessed the feasibility and potentiality of a hybrid scaffold in large and high-load bearing osteochondral defect repair (95). The bone component was mimicked by PCL, while the soft component (cartilage part) was made of fibrin glue. The results demonstrated that PCL scaffold is a potential matrix for osteochondral bone regeneration, whereas fibrin glue does not inherit the physical properties to promote cartilage regeneration in a large and high-load bearing defect site. Schek et al fabricated an osteochondral implant for temporomandibular joint repair (96). IBD and SFF were used to generate load-bearing scaffolds capable of matching patient and defect site geometry. Biphasic composite scaffolds were manufactured, simultaneously generating bone and cartilage in discrete regions.
As one of the most advanced and promising technologies in tissue engineering, 3D-bioprinting combines SFF and precise placement of cells and other biological factors to the desired 2D and 3D positions. It is described as a precise approach for delivering biomaterials, cells and supporting biological factors to the targeted locations with spatial control to fabricate functionally graded 3D constructs.
Other methods and hybrid methods
Pu et al have fabricated bilayer homogenous PLA fibrous scaffolds by a novel electrospinning technique which uses 2 slowly rotating parallel disks as the collector (
Schematic of the electrospinning apparatus for the development of a bilayer homogenous scaffold. (
Uma Maheshwari et al prepared bilayer composites based on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), HAp and PCL for bone tissue engineering. Both polymers were loaded with nanoparticles and then electrospun to form a bilayer composite mat, consisting of a hard component (PVA-HAp) and a soft layer (PCL-HAp) (99). Zhang et al prepared bilayer COL/microporous electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for enhancing the osteochondral regeneration (100). PLA fibers were produced via electrospinning. COL layer was deposited onto PLA nanomat, and bilayer microporous scaffolds (COL-nanofiber) were produced via freeze-drying.
To repair oromaxillary defects, Giannitelli et al studied different foaming conditions to determine the best performance of PU graded foams consisting of a dense shell and a porous core for cell infiltration (38). Salerno et al fabricated the 2 layers of an osteochondral biomimetic PCL/HAp scaffold, by melt-mixing and compression-molding, followed by a foaming process with carbon dioxide (CO2) and NaCl leaching (101). Deepthi et al developed CS-HA hydrogel–coated PCL multiscale bilayer scaffolds for ligament regeneration (102). They fabricated either aligned or random multiscale fibers, observing that the coated scaffolds showed improved protein adsorption and cytocompatibility, and higher cell retention.
Solvent-processing, freeze-drying and sintering were combined by Oliveira et al to prepare HAp/CS bilayered scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering applications (103). In more detail, the HAp layer was created by impregnating a PU sponge with HAp powder. The composite sponge was then burned to remove the polymer, and finally sintered. The CS layer was prepared by dissolving the CS in acetic acid, transferring the CS solution onto HAp scaffolds placed into cylindrical molds and then finally freeze-dried. The materials showed no cytotoxic effect. For the same purpose, Jiang et al prepared bilayered stratified polymer ceramic-hydrogel scaffolds (104). In this case, the technique adopted was a combination of water/oil/water emulsion and sintering methods. Specifically, scaffolds based on agarose hydrogel and composite microspheres of PLGA and bioactive glass (BG) were fabricated and optimized for chondrocyte density and microsphere composition. Although this approach involves complex protocols, it represents a viable strategy to tune the properties of each single layer and achieve high regenerative performances.
Multilayer structures
Preparation routes for the development of multilayer scaffolds include principally freeze-drying (54, 57, 59-60-61-62-63), particulate-leaching (43, 46, 51, 55, 58) and electrospinning (64, 67), but in many cases, the literature reports hybrid technologies combining different methods, such as thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) (4) or supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) (58) as summarized in
Summary of the main key features of FGS obtained by multilayer approaches
FGS System | Technique | Assembling method | Graded property | Target tissue | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL = collagen; CS = chitosan; FGS = functionally graded scaffolds; HA = hyaluronic acid; HAp = hydroxyapatite; NA = not available; PCL = polycaprolactone; PHBV = Poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-3-hydroxyvaleric acid); PLA = polylactic acid; PLGA = poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); PU = polyurethane; scCO2 = supercritical carbon dioxide; TIPS = thermally induced phase separation. | |||||
PLA | NaCl-leaching | Compression-molding | Pore size | Osteochondral | (105) |
PCL | NaCl-leaching | Compression-molding | Pore size | Osteochondral | (46) |
PLA/PCL | NaCl-leaching | Compression-molding | Bulk material | Interface tissues | (51) |
PLGA | Gel microsphere leaching | Solution-casting | Pore size | Osteochondral | (55) |
COL II/COL I, COL II, HA/COL I, HA | Freeze-drying | Iterative freeze-drying | Bulk chemical | Subchondral bone | (61) |
COL/CH–PCL/CS | Freeze-drying | Iterative freeze-drying | Bulk chemical, pore size, porosity | Cartilage | (57) |
CS, HAp | Freeze-drying | Iterative freeze-drying | Mineral concentration | Osteochondral | (60) |
Gel, HAp | Freeze-drying | Iterative freeze-drying | Mineral concentration | Osteochondral | (59) |
COL, HAp | Freeze-drying | Iterative freeze-drying | Mineral concentration | Osteochondral | (106) |
COL/COL, chondroitin sulfate/COL, apatite/COL, apatite | Freeze-drying | Iterative freeze-drying | Bulk chemical, mineral concentration | Tendon-to-bone | (62) |
COL I | Freeze-drying | Multilayer freeze-drying | Pore size | Dermis | (54) |
COL, Mg-HAp/COL, Mg-HAp/HA | Freeze-drying | Multilayer freeze-drying | Bulk chemical, mineral concentration | Osteochondral | (63) |
PLA/PCL-PLA/COL | Electrospinning | Multilayer electrospinning | Bulk chemical | Cranial | (67) |
PLA/PHBV/PLA | Electrospinning | Multilayer electrospinning | Bulk chemical | NA | (64) |
PU/silk/PU | TIPS/braiding/electrospinning | NA | Bulk chemical, structural | Vascular | (107) |
PLA-PCL/PLA-PCL/PLGA | NaCl-leaching, scCO2, pins-made vertical channel | Solvent-assembling | Bulk chemical, structural | Articular cartilage | (58) |
PLA | TIPS/sugar-leaching | Solution-casting | Pore size | Interface tissue | (4) |
Particulate leaching
Scaffaro et al prepared homogenous 3-layered scaffolds in PCL and in PLA presenting pore size distribution that gradually changed from 20 µm to 110 µm (
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of a polylactic acid (PLA)–based homogeneous 3-layer scaffold with a gradient of pore sizes. The pore size distribution of each layer was controlled by the NaCl particle size filled in the PLA matrix during the melt. The layers were assembled by compression-molding before water-leaching and drying. The monolithic structure is characterized by well interconnected porous structure without loss of continuity between the layers. Reproduced from (46) with permission from Elsevier.
(
Tang et al developed (PLGA) scaffolds with graded pores size for osteochondral repairs. Gelatin microspheres with 3 different diameters (350-450 µm, 200-350 µm and 80-200 µm) were used as a template in which a PLGA solution was cast. The system was then freeze-dried and finally put into hot distilled water for 12 hours to leach out the porogen agents. The scaffolds exhibited a porosity as high as about 95% and a gradient of pore sizes across the cylindrical axis (55).
Finally, particulate-leaching allows the tuning of the porosity and pore size by simply tailoring the size and concentration of porogen agents. On the other hand, the pore shape is strongly affected by the porogen geometry, which is difficult to control.
Freeze-drying
The versatility of freeze-drying lies in the possibility of obtaining multilayer constructs via an iterative technique that allows the material composition and scaffold microarchitecture to be specifically tailored in each region of the scaffold. Levingstone et al adopted this method to prepare 3-layered scaffold mimicking the native composition of subchondral bone ECM. The articular cartilage-mimicking layer, was composed of a rich glycosaminoglycan content and type II COL. The cartilage-mimicking layer of the scaffold was made of type I COL, type II COL and HA. Finally, the bone-mimicking layer was prepared with type I COL and HA (61). Zhu et al used a similar approach to fabricate a CS-based 4-layered scaffold presenting a porous structure able to mimic the cartilage ECM. The COL/CH–PCL/CS scaffolds presented hierarchically distributed average pore sizes and porosity, as well as an interconnected porous structure (57).
Kon et al, Yusong et al and Algul et al prepared 3-layered scaffolds made of CH, gel and COL, respectively, by overlapping layers with increasing amounts of mineral phases. The assembled layers were then freeze-dried obtaining a biomimetic interconnected porous structure (59, 60, 106). Similarly, Kim et al prepared a human COL-based 4-layered scaffold with a tailored material composition that was designed for the repair of the tendon-to-bone region. Different materials were chosen to build each layer as follows: (i) COL for the tendon layer; (ii) COL and chondroitin sulfate for the uncalcified fibrocartilage layer; (iii) COL and a small amount of apatite for the calcified fibrocartilage layer; (iv) COL and apatite made up the bone layer. The 4 layers were then assembled by an iterative freeze-drying method (62).
Wang et al used COL type I to prepare a 3-layer scaffold designed for the regeneration of human dermis. Solutions containing COL type I at different concentrations were separately frozen at -80°C and then freeze-dried together. The mean pore size of the scaffolds increased upon increasing the COL concentration. The authors demonstrated that the “sandwich” COL scaffolds significantly promoted wound healing, especially if compared with homogeneous scaffolds displaying a uniform pore size (54). Tampieri et al developed a composite osteochondral scaffold organized in different integrated COL-based layers. The authors piled up the layers onto each other; thereafter, a knitting procedure was used at each interface to ensure good layer integration, thus avoiding delamination at the interfaces. Finally, freeze-drying under vacuum conditions was performed to obtain the porous structure (63).
The main advantage of freeze-drying lies in the possibility of obtaining highly porous, multilayer constructs through an iterative technique that can be adopted for a wide range of polymers. On the other hand, the method is not easy to scale up to an industrial level, and it is usually adopted for small prototypes.
Electrospinning
Multilayer electrospun scaffolds are usually developed by consecutively electrospinning different materials. Wang et al used this technique to prepare a 3-layer scaffold for cranial defects. The inner PLA layer was designed to reduce tissue adhesion on the brain. The middle layer, made of a PLA/PCL blend, was designed to avoid water infiltration. Finally, the COL-based outer layer was designed to promote cell adhesion. Mechanical and in vivo biological tests demonstrated that the multilayer scaffold had sufficient mechanical strength and adequate biochemical properties to be potentially used for dural cranial repairs (67). Bye et al used the same approach to prepare poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV)/PCL or PLA multilayer scaffolds demonstrating the reliability of these systems as biobarriers for preventing cell penetration (64).
Electrospinning is a versatile technique for fabricating nanoscale and microscale fibers, and has great potential for mimicking the microenvironment of natural ECM by controlling a large number of parameters such as flow rate, potential, distance between syringe and collector and so on. Moreover, this approach allows the preparation of scaffolds consisting of different layers more easily compared with the other technique. On the other hand, the intrinsic morphology of the porous structures is often difficult for cells to permeate, without specific precautions.
Other methods and hybrid methods
Mi et al prepared a small-diameter vascular scaffold composed of 3 different layers: a porous outer layer made of thermoplastic PU, a woven silk filament middle layer and a nanofibrous inner layer again in PU. The FGS was fabricated by a multiple-step protocol involving thermally induced phase separation, braiding and electrospinning techniques. The different layers provided the scaffold with better mechanical properties when compared with those observed in each single layer taken separately (107).
Aydin et al produced a structure for the regeneration of defects of articular cartilage composed of 3 distinct layers. The bone-mimicking layer was fabricated from a PLA/PCL polymeric blend dissolved in chloroform and mixed with NaCl. In a second stage, scCO2 was used to enhance the interconnectivity of the monoliths. The PLGA-based upper layer was a nonwoven felt. Finally, vertical channels were formed, starting from the bone layer to the intermediate layer, using stainless steel pins. The channels were designed to facilitate the delivery of osteogenic and chondrogenic clues from bone marrow to then eventually be transformed into Haversian channels (58).
Nie et al prepared a homogeneous 3-layered scaffold made of PLA, combining TIPS and sugar particle leaching. The macropore size gradient was obtained by controlling the sugar particle sizes from 300 µm to 600 µm as well as porosity and interconnectivity. The scaffolds were prepared by packing the sugar spheres in a gradient shape and then casting PLA/dioxane solution under vacuum. Subsequently, the system was freeze-dried, and finally the sugar was leached out in distilled water. The average pore size, as well as the average interpore opening size, was controlled by the average diameter of the sugar spheres (4).
Combining different technologies to obtain a multilayer scaffold offers the possibility of tuning the characteristics of each single region with an high degree of control in terms of mechanical, structural and chemical properties. Conversely, this approach requires complex protocols, thus hindering any industrial scalability of these approaches.
Continuously graded structures
The development of continuously graded structures requires a slightly different approach from that for discretely graded structures. Based on the works reported in the literature, it can be noted that often the combination of at least 2 technique is necessary, as summarized in
Summary of the main key features of FGS obtained by continuous gradient approaches
FGS System | Technique | Gradient maker | Graded property | Target tissue | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CG = glycosaminoglycan; COL = collagen; FGS = functionally graded scaffolds; HAp = hydroxyapatite; PCL = polycaprolactone; PDMSO = Polydimethylsiloxane; PEG = polyethylene glycol; PEGDM = polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate; PLA = polylactic acid; PLGA = poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); TCP = tricalcium phosphate; TIPS = thermally induced phase separation. | |||||
COL I, HAp | Solvent | Diffusion of HAp crystals | Chemical, mechanical, porosity, pore size | Osteochondral | (108) |
PLGA | Liophilization/Freeze-dry | PLGA-protein emulsion flow | Type and concentration of growing factors | Osteochondral | (109) |
PLGA | Centrifugation/Freeze-dry | PLGA-protein emulsion flow | Type and concentration of growing factors | Osteochondral | (110) |
PEG, HAp | Ball-milling/Freeze-casting | Kinetics of crystallization | Pore size | Osteochondral | (111) |
CG, COL II/CG+CaP, COL I | Liquid-phase co-synthesis | Interdiffusion of unmineralized and mineralized particles | Mechanical, porosity | Osteochondral | (5) |
PLA | TIPS | Temperature and time | Pore size | Osteochondral | (112) |
PDMSO/PEG | UV-assisted photopolymerization | Type and concentration of photoinitiator | Mechanical, porosity, bioactivity | Osteochondral | (113) |
PEGDM | UV-assisted photopolymerization | Polymer chain length | Mechanical | Osteochondral | (114) |
PEGDM | UV-assisted photopolymerization | Polymer concentration | Mechanical | Osteochondral | (115) |
Dextrane | UV-assisted cross-linking | Dual-programmable syringe pump system | Bioactivity | Osteochondral | (116) |
PEGDM/epoxy | UV-assisted photopolymerization | Selective photopolymerization | Mechanical | Osteochondral | (117) |
PLGA, PLGA/HAp | Dual electrospinning | Collector speed | Mechanical, structural | Osteochondral | (118) |
PLGA | Electrospinning | Chitosan functionalization | Bioactivity, mechanical, chemical | Osteochondral | (119) |
PCL | Electrospinning | Convection-diffusion flow | bioactivity | Osteochondral | (120) |
Gelatin/HAp | Electrospinning | Microinfusion pump for gradient of aminolysis | Bioactivity, chemical, mechanical | Osteochondral | (121) |
PCL/TCP | Twin-screw extrusion/electrospinning | Multichannel spinneret die with time-dependent feeding | Porosity, mechanical, wettability, biodegradation rate | Bone-cartilage tissue | (122) |
PCL | Centrifugation/heating PCL in a cylindrical mold | Graded centrifugal force along the axis | Pore size | Study of the interactions between cells or tissues and scaffolds | (53) |
Solvent-based techniques
Liu et al reported an in situ diffusion method for the fabrication of compositionally graded COL/HAp composite scaffolds (108). Chemical and microstructural analyses revealed a gradient of the Ca/P ratio across the width of the COL scaffold template, resulting in the formation of a calcium-enriched side and a calcium-depleted side of scaffold. Dormer et al fabricated a FGS by encapsulating proteins in polymer droplets, achieved by ultrasonication (109). The resulting polymer microspheres, containing a graded amount of proteins, were then sintered and freeze-dried to achieve the final structure. The results highlighted that continuous gradients in bioactive signals allowed the temporal and spatial release of appropriate growth factors for the osteochondral regeneration.
A similar approach was previously adopted by Wang et al (110). In this case, 2 growth factors, bone morphogenetic protein 2 and insulin-like growth factor I, were incorporated as a single concentration gradient or reverse gradient combining 2 factors in the scaffolds. Bai et al fabricated biomimetic scaffolds by freeze-casting a slurry of HAp particles (111). The slurry, containing nanoparticles and various reactants such as surfactants and polymers (i.e., PEG and Aquazol), was ball-milled and freeze-casted. During the freezing process, lamellar ice crystals grew preferentially from the copper rod outward to the plastic mold, generating a gradient in their thickness. At the same time, HAp particles were expelled and assembled to replicate the structure of ice crystals. The authors were able to achieve interconnected gradient channels mimicking the porous network of natural bone.
Harley et al adopted a “liquid-phase co-synthesis” technique that was found to enable the production of porous, layered scaffolds mimicking the composition and structure of articular cartilage on one side, subchondral bone on the other side, and a continuous, gradual or soft interface between the 2 tissues (i.e., articular joints) (5). Liquid-phase co-synthesis interdiffusion of unmineralized, type II COL-glycosaminoglycan (CG) and mineralized (reinforced with CaP nanoparticles), type I COL-glycosaminoglycan (CG-CaP) suspensions were subsequently freeze-dried.
Mannella et al developed a porous scaffold with a pore size gradient by TIPS, achieved by imposing a different thermal history on the 2 sides of a polymeric solution, consisting of PLA, dioxane and water (112). The authors demonstrated the possibility of tuning the pore size range by controlling and manipulating some key parameters, such as demixing temperature and residence time in the miscibility gap region.
In some cases, the solvent-based technique is combined with UV-assisted reactions, such as photopolymerization or cross-linking to fabricate continuous graded scaffolds (113). Two different macromers (each one in its own appropriate solvent) and photocatalyst solutions were used to prepare a functionalized star polydimethylsiloxane, processable in dichloromethane, and a modified PEG. The continuous gradient of the scaffold was achieved by a gradient maker, whereas the integration of the 2 polymers was ensured by UV-assisted cross-linking. The results demonstrated spatial variation in morphology, bioactivity, swelling and elastic modulus.
Nemir et al used PEG dimethacrylate (PEGDM) hydrogels, with varying polymer chain length, and photolithographic patterning techniques to provide substrates with spatially tunable mechanical properties in both gradients and distinct patterns (114). The hydrogels were patterned to produce anisotropic structures exhibiting patterned strain under mechanical loading. Similarly, Chatterjee et al prepared PEGDM hydrogel, which gradient was imparted by mixing two PEGDM solutions (at different concentration) containing suspended cells in the stock chambers of a gradient maker (115). The prepolymer solution was then polymerized through the glass slide of the mold by exposure to UV. Hill et al fabricated photocrosslinkable dextran hydrogels containing a gradient of siRNA, using a dual-programmable syringe pump system, and showed a differential gene silencing in incorporated cells sustained over time (116). More recently, selective photopolymerization of PEGDM and epoxy monomers was used to provide tunable elasticity in a multimaterial hydrogel (117).
Electrospinning
He et al fabricated nanofibrous scaffolds with continuous structure and composition gradients in 2 electrospinning steps (118). In the first step, a PLGA solution was moved back and forth along the axis of the collector, rotating at high speed to produce aligned nanofibers. Two hours later, the PLGA loaded with HAp nanoparticles was electrospun onto the exposed aligned nanomat previously realized. In this case, the collector was kept at low rotation speed and 30 degree swinging to produce a randomly oriented PLGA-HAp mat. The different distance between needle and cylindrical surface in the 2 steps enabled the formation of a thickness gradient at the boundary of the aligned and random nanomats along the circumferential direction of the collector. Owing to these features, the FGS possessed a structural and chemical gradient. Lipner et al created PLGA nanofibrous scaffolds by electrospinning (119). Thereafter, the nanomats were cut into small pieces, plasma-treated to enhance their hydrophilicity and coupled with CS to promote the attachment of calcium ions, thus enabling mineral nucleation.
Tzezana et al prepared electrospun PCL fibers loaded with all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA), designed to release ATRA at a predetermined rate, due to morphogenic gradients throughout the thickness of hydrospun scaffolds (120). The structures were then exposed to flow conditions in a bioreactor, and gradient formation was verified by a convection-diffusion mathematical model, which proved a continuous solute gradient across the scaffold.
Zou et al prepared electrospun fibers with graded contents of amino groups, with the latter being generated through an aminolysis process using a microinfusion pump (121). Gelatin grafts allowed the creation of fibrous scaffolds with gradients in HAp contents, crystal size and mechanical properties through in situ mineralization. Plasmid DNA (pDNA) was included during the mineralization process, and gradations in pDNA loading contents were created on fibrous scaffolds, strongly depending on HAp gradients. Gradients in the amount of pDNA released and the expression of target proteins provided a temporally and spatially controlled delivery of growth factors in scaffolds. Hence, after cell seeding, the fibrous mats displayed gradients in cell density, osteoblastic differentiation and COL deposition along the longitudinal axis.
Other methods and hybrid methods
Erisken et al fabricated functionally graded nonwoven meshes of PCL incorporated with tricalcium phosphate (TCP) nanoparticles using a hybrid twin-screw extrusion/electrospinning process. For this purpose, the multichannel spinneret die of the twin-screw extruder was connected to a high-voltage supply, to permit the time-dependent feeding of various solid and liquid ingredients and their melting, dispersion, deaeration and pressurization together with electrospinning in continuum (122).
Oh et al used a centrifugation-based method to realize a scaffold presenting a gradient pore size distribution increasing along the longitudinal direction. In particular, the scaffolds were prepared in 2 steps: (i) centrifugation and (ii) heating fibril-like PCL in a cylindrical mold. The FGS was achieved by exploiting the gradual increment of the centrifugal force along the axis. Morphological analysis showed a gradual increase of the pore size distribution from 88 to 405 µm that could be easily controlled by tuning the rotational speed (53).
Conclusion and future perspectives
This work provides a brief overview of the main strategies adopted by the scientific community to fabricate bilayered, multilayered and continuous FGS. Several different technologies have been investigated, and often combined, to customize each region of the FGS and to optimize the regeneration performance. The solvent-based approach presents several issues related to toxic solvent utilization. Nevertheless, it allows the achievement of versatile structures by tailoring the localization of additives in specific regions of the scaffolds. On the other hand, melt-based approaches are characterized by the absence of toxic solvents. However, that technique presents some drawbacks, such as the difficulty to achieve complex structures or the impossibility of fabricating continuous graded structures.
As regards the strategies used to create voids, particulate leaching remains one of the most important pathways due to its easy control of pore size distribution and porosity. On the other hand, freeze-drying allows the achievement of scaffolds presenting higher porosity if compared with other methods. Electrospinning allows the creation of a 2D structure with spatially tunable properties, but the nanofibrous morphology is often found to hinder the cell infiltration.
Among the most important future possibilities, computer-aided design permits a very interesting way to prepare scaffold presenting very specific gradients that can be optimized for the individual patient. The major limitation of rapid prototyping lies in the time and cost spent in generation of 3D objects. Furthermore, rapid prototyping can only be applied to structures not exceeding certain dimensions, as 3D printers are not able to produce extremely large models.
Nowadays, the “optimal” technique to prepare FGS is not available because, as discussed above, each method presents its own peculiar advantages and drawbacks. Furthermore, most current therapeutic tissue engineering treatments are intended primarily for relatively small defects, and are immature compared with native tissues. Scientific investigation and engineering design should also look into the creation of bioreactor systems for mechanical stimulation. Finally, in designing tissue engineering grafts, animal studies are considered to be an important validation step. The implantation site has been shown to affect the in vivo outcomes of engineered constructs.
Technology for FGS has advanced rapidly, and further progress in this area will likely have a significant impact on the future clinical success of tissue engineering strategies.
Disclosures
-
1.
Yousefi A-M Hoque ME Prasad RG Uth N Current strategies in multiphasic scaffold design for osteochondral tissue engineering: a review. 2015 103 7 2460 2481 -
3.
Lo Re G Lopresti F Petrucci G Scaffaro R A facile method to determine pore size distribution in porous scaffold by using image processing. 2015 76 37 45 -
4.
Nie T Xue L Ge M Ma H Zhang J Fabrication of poly(L-lactic acid) tissue engineering scaffolds with precisely controlled gradient structure. 2016 176 25 28 -
5.
Harley BA Lynn AK Wissner-Gross Z Bonfield W Yannas IV Gibson LJ Design of a multiphase osteochondral scaffold III: fabrication of layered scaffolds with continuous interfaces. 2010 92 3 1078 1093 -
6.
Nguyen LH Kudva AK Saxena NS Roy K Engineering articular cartilage with spatially-varying matrix composition and mechanical properties from a single stem cell population using a multi-layered hydrogel. 2011 32 29 6946 6952 -
7.
Singhvi R Kumar A Lopez GP et al. Engineering cell shape and function. 1994 264 5159 696 698 -
8.
Soon Y-M Shin K-H Koh Y-H Lee J-H Choi W-Y Kim H-E Fabrication and compressive strength of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds with a functionally graded core/shell structure. 2011 31 1-2 13 18 -
9.
Levingstone TJ Thompson E Matsiko A Schepens A Gleeson JP O’Brien FJ Multi-layered collagen-based scaffolds for osteochondral defect repair in rabbits. 2016 32 149 160 -
10.
Kidoaki S Matsuda T Microelastic gradient gelatinous gels to induce cellular mechanotaxis. 2008 133 2 225 230 -
11.
Castro NJ Hacking SA Zhang LG Recent progress in interfacial tissue engineering approaches for osteochondral defects. 2012 40 8 1628 1640 -
12.
Mente PL Lewis JL Elastic modulus of calcified cartilage is an order of magnitude less than that of subchondral bone. 1994 12 5 637 647 -
13.
Atesok K Doral MN Karlsson J et al. Multilayer scaffolds in orthopaedic tissue engineering. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 24 7 2365 2373 -
14.
Hutmacher DW Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. 2000 21 24 2529 2543 -
15.
Lien SM Chien CH Huang TJ A novel osteochondral scaffold of ceramic-gelatin assembly for articular cartilage repair. 2009 29 1 315 321 -
16.
Yazdimamaghani M Razavi M Vashaee D Pothineni VR Rajadas J Tayebi L Significant degradability enhancement in multilayer coating of polycaprolactone-bioactive glass/gelatin-bioactive glass on magnesium scaffold for tissue engineering applications. 2015 338 137 145 -
17.
Hasan MS Carpenter N Wei TL McNally D Ahmed I Boszczyk BM Effects of adding resorbable phosphate glass fibres and PLA to calcium phosphate bone cements. 2014 12 3 203 209 -
18.
Alhag M Farrell E Toner M Lee TC O’Brien FJ Claffey N Evaluation of the ability of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds with or without mesenchymal stem cells to heal bone defects in Wistar rats. 2012 16 1 47 55 -
20.
Matsiko A Levingstone TJ Gleeson JP O’Brien FJ Incorporation of TGF-beta 3 within collagen-hyaluronic acid scaffolds improves their chondrogenic potential. 2015 4 8 1175 1179 -
21.
Raftery R O’Brien FJ Cryan SA Chitosan for gene delivery and orthopedic tissue engineering applications. 2013 18 5 5611 5647 -
22.
Mehr NG Hoemann CD Favis BD Chitosan surface modification of fully interconnected 3D porous poly(ε-caprolactone) by the LbL approach. 2015 64 112 121 -
23.
Wang X-Y Jin Z-H Gan B-W Lv S-W Xie M Huang W-H Engineering interconnected 3D vascular networks in hydrogels using molded sodium alginate lattice as the sacrificial template. 2014 14 15 2709 2716 -
24.
Algul D Sipahi H Aydin A Kelleci F Ozdatli S Yener FG Biocompatibility of biomimetic multilayered alginate–chitosan/β-TCP scaffold for osteochondral tissue. 2015 79 363 369 -
25.
Coluccino L Stagnaro P Vassalli M Scaglione S Bioactive TGF-β1/HA alginate-based scaffolds for osteochondral tissue repair: design, realization and multilevel characterization. 2016 14 1 e42 e52 -
26.
Hodgkinson T Bayat A In vitro and ex vivo analysis of hyaluronan supplementation of Integra® dermal template on human dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes. 2016 14 1 e9 e18 -
27.
Gupta P Nayak KK Compatibility study of alginate/keratin blend for biopolymer development. 2015 13 4 e332 e339 -
28.
Martín-López E Nieto-Díaz M Nieto-Sampedro M Influence of chitosan concentration on cell viability and proliferation in vitro by changing film topography. 2013 11 3 e151 e158 -
29.
Palumbo FS Fiorica C Pitarresi G Agnello S Giammona G Interpenetrated 3D porous scaffolds of silk fibroin with an amino and octadecyl functionalized hyaluronic acid. 2015 5 75 61440 61448 -
30.
Dhandayuthapani B Yoshida Y Maekawa T Kumar DS Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: a review. 2011 2011 1 19 -
31.
Liu X Holzwarth JM Ma PX Functionalized synthetic biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. 2012 12 7 911 919 -
32.
Puppi D Chiellini F Piras AM Chiellini E Polymeric materials for bone and cartilage repair. 2010 35 4 403 440 -
33.
Scaffaro R Lopresti F Sutera A et al. Effect of PCL/PEG-based membranes on actinorhodin production in streptomyces coelicolor cultivations. 2016 16 5 686 693 -
34.
Steffens D Rezende RA Santi B et al. 3D-printed PCL scaffolds for the cultivation of mesenchymal stem cells. 2016 14 1 e19 e25 -
35.
Naghashzargar E Farè S Catto V et al. Nano/micro hybrid scaffold of PCL or P3HB nanofibers combined with silk fibroin for tendon and ligament tissue engineering. 2015 13 2 e156 e168 -
36.
Lu L Zhang Q Wootton DM et al. Mechanical study of polycaprolactone-hydroxyapatite porous scaffolds created by porogen-based solid freeform fabrication method. 2014 12 3 145 154 -
37.
Scaffaro R Maio A Lopresti F et al. Synthesis and self-assembly of a PEGylated-graphene aerogel. 2016 128 193 200 -
38.
Giannitelli SM Basoli F Mozetic P et al. Graded porous polyurethane foam: a potential scaffold for oro-maxillary bone regeneration. 2015 51 329 335 -
39.
Mano JF Reis RL Osteochondral defects: present situation and tissue engineering approaches. 2007 1 4 261 273 -
40.
Fiore V Botta L Scaffaro R Valenza A Pirrotta A PLA based biocomposites reinforced with Arundo donax fillers. 2014 105 110 7 -
41.
Scaffaro R Botta L Sanfilippo M Gallo G Palazzolo G Puglia AM Combining in the melt physical and biological properties of poly(caprolactone) and chlorhexidine to obtain antimicrobial surgical monofilaments. 2013 97 1 99 109 -
42.
Scaffaro R Morreale M Mirabella F La Mantia FP Preparation and recycling of plasticized PLA. 2011 296 2 141 150 -
43.
Scaffaro R Lopresti F Botta L Rigogliuso S Ghersi G Preparation of three-layered porous PLA/PEG scaffold: relationship between morphology, mechanical behavior and cell permeability. 2016 54 8 20 -
44.
Domingos M Intranuovo F Gloria A et al. Improved osteoblast cell affinity on plasma-modified 3-D extruded PCL scaffolds. 2013 9 4 5997 6005 -
45.
Luk JZ Cork J Cooper-White J Grindahl L Use of two-step grafting to fabricate dual-functional films and site-specific functionalized scaffolds. 2015 31 5 1746 1754 -
46.
Scaffaro R Lopresti F Botta L Rigogliuso S Ghersi G Melt processed PCL/PEG scaffold with discrete pore size gradient for selective cellular infiltration. 2016 301 2 182 190 -
47.
Scaffaro R Lo Re G Rigogliuso S Ghersi G 3D polylactide-based scaffolds for studying human hepatocarcinoma processes in vitro. 2012 13 4 45003 -
48.
Yang X Wang L Guan G et al. Mechanical and biocompatibility performance of bicomponent polyester/silk fibroin small-diameter arterial prostheses. 2015 13 3 e201 e209 -
49.
Chang N-J Jhung Y-R Yao C-K Yeh M-L Hydrophilic gelatin and hyaluronic acid-treated PLGA scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. 2013 11 1 e45 e52 -
50.
Scaffaro R Lopresti F Botta L Rigogliuso S Ghersi G Integration of PCL and PLA in a monolithic porous scaffold for interface tissue engineering. 2016 63 303 313 -
51.
Scaffaro R Lopresti F Botta L Maio A Mechanical behavior of polylactic acid/polycaprolactone porous layered functional composites. 2016 98 70 77 -
52.
Seidi A Ramalingam M Elloumi-Hannachi I Ostrovidov S Khademhosseini A Gradient biomaterials for soft-to-hard interface tissue engineering. 2011 7 4 1441 1451 -
53.
Oh SH Park IK Kim JM Lee JH In vitro and in vivo characteristics of PCL scaffolds with pore size gradient fabricated by a centrifugation method. 2007 28 9 1664 1671 -
54.
Wang Y Xu R Luo G Lei Q Shu Q Yao Z et al. Biomimetic fibroblast-loaded artificial dermis with “sandwich” structure and designed gradient pore sizes promotes wound healing by favoring granulation tissue formation and wound re-epithelialization. 2016 30 246 57 -
55.
Tang G Zhang H Zhao Y Zhang Y Li X Yuan X Preparation of PLGA scaffolds with graded pores by using a gelatin-microsphere template as porogen. 2012 23 17 2241 2257 -
56.
Sadat-Shojai M Khorasani MT Jamshidi A A new strategy for fabrication of bone scaffolds using electrospun nano-HAp/PHB fibers and protein hydrogels. 2016 289 38 47 -
57.
Zhu Y Wu H Sun S Zhou T Wu J Wan Y Designed composites for mimicking compressive mechanical properties of articular cartilage matrix. 2014 36 32 46 -
58.
Aydin HM A three-layered osteochondral plug: structural, mechanical, and in vitro biocompatibility analysis. 2011 13 12 511 517 -
59.
Yusong P Qianqian S Chengling P Jing W Prediction of mechanical properties of multilayer gradient hydroxyapatite reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) gel biomaterial. 2013 101 5 729 735 -
60.
Kon E Delcogliano M Filardo G et al. Orderly osteochondral regeneration in a sheep model using a novel nano-composite multilayered biomaterial. 2010 28 1 116 124 -
61.
Levingstone TJ Matsiko A Dickson GR O’Brien FJ Gleeson JP A biomimetic multi-layered collagen-based scaffold for osteochondral repair. 2014 10 5 1996 2004 -
62.
Kim BS Kim EJ Choi JS Jeong JH Jo CH Cho YW Human collagen-based multilayer scaffolds for tendon-to-bone interface tissue engineering. 2014 102 11 4044 4054 -
63.
Tampieri A Sandri M Landi E et al. Design of graded biomimetic osteochondral composite scaffolds. 2008 29 26 3539 3546 -
64.
Bye FJ Bissoli J Black L et al. Development of bilayer and trilayer nanofibrous/microfibrous scaffolds for regenerative medicine. 2013 1 9 942 951 -
65.
Mi Y Zhou W Li Q et al. Preparation of water-in-oil emulsions using a hydrophobic polymer membrane with 3D bicontinuous skeleton structure. 2015 490 113 119 -
66.
Ding S Li L Liu X Yang G Zhou G Zhou S A nano-micro alternating multilayer scaffold loading with rBMSCs and BMP-2 for bone tissue engineering. 2015 133 286 295 -
67.
Wang YF Guo HF Ying DJ Multilayer scaffold of electrospun PLA-PCL-collagen nanofibers as a dural substitute. 2013 101 8 1359 1366 -
68.
Mi H-Y Jing X Yu E McNulty J Peng X-F Turng L-S Fabrication of triple-layered vascular scaffolds by combining electrospinning, braiding, and thermally induced phase separation. 2015 161 305 308 -
70.
Font Tellado S Balmayor ER Van Griensven M Strategies to engineer tendon/ligament-to-bone interface: biomaterials, cells and growth factors. 2015 94 126 140 -
71.
Samorezov JE Alsberg E Spatial regulation of controlled bioactive factor delivery for bone tissue engineering. 2015 84 45 67 -
72.
Giannitelli SM Accoto D Trombetta M Rainer A Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering. 2014 10 2 580 594 -
73.
Dormer NH Berkland CJ Detamore MS Emerging techniques in stratified designs and continuous gradients for tissue engineering of interfaces. 2010 38 6 2121 2141 -
74.
Lopa S Madry H Bioinspired scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. 2014 20 15-16 2052 2076 -
75.
Jiang T Carbone EJ Lo KW-H Laurencin CT Electrospinning of polymer nanofibers for tissue regeneration. 2014 46 1 24 -
76.
Lu HH Thomopoulos S Functional attachment of soft tissues to bone: development, healing, and tissue engineering. 2013 15 201 226 -
77.
Sola A Bellucci D Cannillo V Functionally graded materials for orthopedic applications: an update on design and manufacturing. 2016 34 5 504 31 -
78.
Nguyen EH Schwartz MP Murphy WL Biomimetic approaches to control soluble concentration gradients in biomaterials. 2011 11 4 483 492 -
79.
Qi Y Du Y Li W Dai X Zhao T Yan W Cartilage repair using mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) sheet and MSCs-loaded bilayer PLGA scaffold in a rabbit model. 2014 22 6 1424 1433 -
80.
Giannoni P Lazzarini E Ceseracciu L Barone AC Quarto R Scaglione S Design and characterization of a tissue-engineered bilayer scaffold for osteochondral tissue repair. 2015 9 10 1182 1192 -
81.
Duan P Pan Z Cao L et al. The effects of pore size in bilayered poly(lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds on restoring osteochondral defects in rabbits. 2014 102 1 180 192 -
82.
Chen G Sato T Tanaka J Tateishi T Preparation of a biphasic scaffold for osteochondral tissue engineering. 2006 26 1 118 123 -
83.
Reem T Witte F Willbold E Ruvinov E Cohen S Simultaneous regeneration of articular cartilage and subchondral bone induced by spatially presented TGF-beta and BMP-4 in a bilayer affinity binding system. 2012 8 9 3283 3293 -
84.
Martínez Ávila H Feldmann E-M Pleumeekers MM et al. Novel bilayer bacterial nanocellulose scaffold supports neocartilage formation in vitro and in vivo. 2015 44 122 133 -
85.
Niederauer GG Slivka MA Leatherbury NC et al. Evaluation of multiphase implants for repair of focal osteochondral defects in goats. 2000 21 24 2561 2574 -
86.
Bi L Li D Liu J et al. Fabrication and characterization of a biphasic scaffold for osteochondral tissue engineering. 2011 65 13 2079 2082 -
87.
Schleicher I Lips KS Sommer U et al. Biphasic scaffolds for repair of deep osteochondral defects in a sheep model. 2013 183 1 184 192 -
88.
Deng T Lv J Pang J Liu B Ke J Construction of tissue-engineered osteochondral composites and repair of large joint defects in rabbit. 2014 8 7 546 556 -
89.
Marrella A Aiello M Quarto R Scaglione S Chemical and morphological gradient scaffolds to mimic hierarchically complex tissues: from theoretical modeling to their fabrication. 2016 113 10 2286 2297 -
90.
Monteiro IP Shukla A Marques AP Reis RL Hammond PT Spray-assisted layer-by-layer assembly on hyaluronic acid scaffolds for skin tissue engineering. 2015 103 1 330 340 -
91.
Reyes R Delgado A Sánchez E Fernández A Hernández A Evora C Repair of an osteochondral defect by sustained delivery of BMP-2 or TGFβ1 from a bilayered alginate-PLGA scaffold. 2014 8 7 521 533 -
92.
Maio A Fucarino R Khatibi R Rosselli S Bruno M Scaffaro R A novel approach to prevent graphene oxide re-aggregation during the melt compounding with polymers. 2015 119 131 137 -
93.
Ghosh S Viana JC Reis RL Mano JF Bi-layered constructs based on poly(l-lactic acid) and starch for tissue engineering of osteochondral defects. 2008 28 1 80 86 -
94.
Sherwood JK Riley SL Palazzolo R et al. A three-dimensional osteochondral composite scaffold for articular cartilage repair. 2002 23 24 4739 4751 -
95.
Shao XX Hutmacher DW Ho ST Goh JC Lee EH Evaluation of a hybrid scaffold/cell construct in repair of high-load-bearing osteochondral defects in rabbits. 2006 27 7 1071 1080 -
96.
Schek RM Taboas JM Hollister SJ Krebsbach PH Tissue engineering osteochondral implants for temporomandibular joint repair. 2005 8 4 313 319 -
97.
Pu J Komvopoulos K Mechanical properties of electrospun bilayer fibrous membranes as potential scaffolds for tissue engineering. 2014 10 6 2718 2726 -
98.
Pu J Yuan F Li S Komvopoulos K Electrospun bilayer fibrous scaffolds for enhanced cell infiltration and vascularization in vivo. 2015 13 131 141 -
99.
Uma Maheshwari S Samuel VK Nagiah N Fabrication and evaluation of (PVA/HAp/PCL) bilayer composites as potential scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration application. 2014 40 6 8469 8477 -
100.
Zhang S Chen L Jiang Y et al. Bi-layer collagen/microporous electrospun nanofiber scaffold improves the osteochondral regeneration. 2013 9 7 7236 7247 -
101.
Salerno A Iannace S Netti PA Graded biomimetic osteochondral scaffold prepared via CO 2 foaming and micronized NaCl leaching. 2012 82 137 140 -
102.
Deepthi S Jeevitha K Nivedhitha Sundaram M Chennazhi KP Jayakumar R Chitosan-hyaluronic acid hydrogel coated poly(caprolactone) multiscale bilayer scaffold for ligament regeneration. 2015 260 478 485 -
103.
Oliveira JM Rodrigues MT Silva SS et al. Novel hydroxyapatite/chitosan bilayered scaffold for osteochondral tissue-engineering applications: scaffold design and its performance when seeded with goat bone marrow stromal cells. 2006 27 36 6123 6137 -
104.
Jiang J Tang A Ateshian GA Guo XE Hung CT Lu HH Bioactive stratified polymer ceramic-hydrogel scaffold for integrative osteochondral repair. 2010 38 6 2183 2196 -
105.
Scaffaro R Lopresti F Botta L Rigogliuso S Ghersi G Preparation of three-layered porous PLA/PEG scaffold : relationship between morphology, mechanical behavior and cell permeability. 2016 54 8 20 -
106.
Algul D Sipahi H Aydin A Kelleci F Ozdatli S Yener FG Biocompatibility of biomimetic multilayered alginate–chitosan/β-TCP scaffold for osteochondral tissue. 2015 79 363 369 -
107.
Mi H-Y Jing X Yu E McNulty J Peng X-F Turng L-S Fabrication of triple-layered vascular scaffolds by combining electrospinning, braiding, and thermally induced phase separation. 2015 161 305 308 -
108.
Liu C Han Z Czernuszka JT Gradient collagen/nanohydroxyapatite composite scaffold: development and characterization. 2009 5 2 661 669 -
109.
Dormer NH Singh M Zhao L Mohan N Berkland CJ Detamore MS Osteochondral interface regeneration of the rabbit knee with macroscopic gradients of bioactive signals. 2012 100A 162 170 -
110.
Wang X Wenk E Zhang X Meinel L Vunjak-novakovic G Kaplan DL Growth factor gradients via microsphere delivery in biopolymer scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering. 2009 134 2 81 90 -
111.
Bai H Wang D Delattre B et al. Biomimetic gradient scaffold from ice-templating for self-seeding of cells with capillary effect. 2015 20 113 119 -
112.
Mannella GA Conoscenti G Pavia FC La Carrubba V Brucato V Preparation of polymeric foams with a pore size gradient via thermally induced phase separation (TIPS). 2015 160 31 33 -
113.
Bailey BM Nail LN Grunlan MA Continuous gradient scaffolds for rapid screening of cell–material interactions and interfacial tissue regeneration. 2013 9 9 8254 8261 -
114.
Nemir S Hayenga HN West JL PEGDA hydrogels with patterned elasticity: novel tools for the study of cell response to substrate rigidity. 2010 105 3 636 644 -
115.
Chatterjee K Lin-Gibson S Wallace WE et al. The effect of 3D hydrogel scaffold modulus on osteoblast differentiation and mineralization revealed by combinatorial screening. 2010 31 19 5051 5062 -
116.
Hill MC Nguyen MK Jeon O Alsberg E Spatial control of cell gene expression by siRNA gradients in biodegradable hydrogels. 2015 4 5 714 722 -
117.
Larsen EKU Larsen NB Almdal K Larsen EKU Larsen NB Almdal K Multimaterial hydrogel with widely tunable elasticity by selective photopolymerization of PEG diacrylate and epoxy monomers. 2016 (April):1195-1201. -
118.
He J Qin T Liu Y Li X Li D Jin Z Electrospinning of nanofibrous scaffolds with continuous structure and material gradients. 2014 137 393 397 -
119.
Lipner J Liu W Liu Y et al. The mechanics of PLGA nanofiber scaffolds with biomimetic gradients in mineral for tendon-to-bone repair. 2014 40 59 68 -
120.
Tzezana R Reznik S Blumenthal J Zussman E Levenberg S Regulation of stem cell differentiation by control of retinoic acid gradients in hydrospun 3D scaffold. 2012 12 5 598 607 -
121.
Zou B Liu Y Luo X Chen F Guo X Li X Electrospun fibrous scaffolds with continuous gradations in mineral contents and biological cues for manipulating cellular behaviors. 2012 8 4 1576 1585 -
122.
Erisken C Kalyon DM Wang H Functionally graded electrospun polycaprolactone and beta-tricalcium phosphate nanocomposites for tissue engineering applications. 2008 29 30 4065 4073
Authors
- Scaffaro, Roberto [PubMed] [Google Scholar] , * Corresponding Author ([email protected])
- Lopresti, Francesco [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maio, Andrea [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sutera, Fiorenza [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Botta, Luigi [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Affiliations
-
Department of Civil, Environmental, Aerospace, Materials Engineering, RU INSTM, University of Palermo, Palermo - Italy
Article usage statistics
The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.