Development of polymeric functionally graded scaffolds: a brief review
Abstract
Over recent years, there has been a growing interest in multilayer scaffolds fabrication approaches. In fact, functionally graded scaffolds (FGSs) provide biological and mechanical functions potentially similar to those of native tissues. Based on the final application of the scaffold, there are different properties (physical, mechanical, biochemical, etc.) which need to gradually change in space. Therefore, a number of different technologies have been investigated, and often combined, to customize each region of the scaffolds as much as possible, aiming at achieving the best regenerative performance.
In general, FGSs can be categorized as bilayered or multilayered, depending on the number of layers in the whole structure. In other cases, scaffolds are characterized by a continuous gradient of 1 or more specific properties that cannot be related to the presence of clearly distinguished layers. Since each traditional approach presents peculiar advantages and disadvantages, FGSs are good candidates to overcome the limitations of current treatment options. In contrast to the reviews reported in the literature, which usually focus on the application of FGS, this brief review provides an overview of the most common strategies adopted to prepare FGS.
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2017; 15(2): e107 - e121
Article Type: REVIEW
DOI:10.5301/jabfm.5000332
Authors
Roberto Scaffaro, Francesco Lopresti, Andrea Maio, Fiorenza Sutera, Luigi Botta
Article History
• Accepted on 29/09/2016
• Available online on 16/12/2016
• Published online on 26/04/2017
Disclosures
Financial support: This work was supported by Consortium INSTM.
Conflict of interest: None of the authors has any financial interest related to this study to disclose.
Functionally graded scaffolds for tissue engineering
Tissue engineering combines the knowledge of materials science and bioengineering to develop structures able to substitute for and restore the normal function of injured or diseased tissues. In this context, polymeric 3-dimensional (3D) scaffolds are widely investigated as temporary cell guidance structures during tissue restoration (1-2-3).
It is well known that living tissues are characterized by a gradient of different cell types, extracellular matrix (ECM) morphology, and mineral quantities and composition, as well as mechanical responses. Designing functionally graded scaffolds (FGSs) requires the examination of the hierarchical structure of native tissues from the microbiological level up to the tissue structure to recognize and exploit the relationships between structure and function. The main challenge of this strategy lies in finding methods able to customize, as much as possible, each region of the scaffolds to achieve the best regenerative performance, taking into account both tissue and patient requirements (4).
For instance, the cartilage–bone interface, schematically shown in Figure 1, exhibits a complex gradient of biomolecules and mineral quantities. The content of calcium phosphate (CaP) gradually decreases from the subchondral bone plate (75 wt%) to the articular cartilage (AC) (0 wt%) (5). Moreover, from the surface to the deep calcified zone of AC, the collagen (COL) type II level gradually decreases, with increasing type X COL and proteoglycans (6).
Scheme of the structural gradient occurring in the ostechondral junction. Four different zones can be observed based on the cell morphology, matrix composition, collagen fibril orientation and mechanical properties. (i) Superficial zone has fewer chondrocytes and collagen fibers parallel to the joint surface. (ii) Intermediate (middle) zone has larger collagen fibers interlacing with each other. (iii) Deep zone has tightly packed fibers perpendicular to the joint surface, active cells and lower water content. The deep zone also includes the tidemark (basophilic line which straddles the boundary between uncalcified and calcified cartilage). (iv) Calcified zone or “subchondral bone” is where the transition from soft to stiff subchondral bone occurs, responsible for firmly attaching the noncalcified cartilage to the underlying subchondral bone. Reproduced from (13) with permission from Springer.
Cell migration and differentiation can be affected by the presence of a gradient of physical or chemical properties on the surface of the culture substrate, in particular if the scaffold is able to mimic the inherent gradient property of the native tissue (7). Apart from biological characteristics, scaffolds need to satisfy specific mechanical requirements. In particular, the scaffolds’ mechanical properties should be close to those of the native tissues that need to be restored (8). Furthermore, adequate mechanical properties induce stress transmission closely matching those of surrounding native tissue thus stimulating the regeneration (9). In this context, scaffold presenting graded mechanical properties are potentially able to reproduce the biomechanical properties of living graded tissue better than monolayered scaffold. For example, the compressive modulus of superficial, middle and deep zones of cartilage is 0.08, 2.10 and 320.0 MPa, respectively, indicating the notable differences in stiffness of this tissue (10). The compressive modulus of subchondral bone (5.7 GPa) is higher than that of cartilage (11-12-13). Furthermore, a gradient of the mechanical properties in a cell substrate can lead to cell movement (mechanotaxis).
Materials involved in tissue engineering are usually natural or synthetic polymers, or inorganic materials such as metals and ceramics (14-15-16-17). Among these, biodegradable polymers have attracted much attention due to their unique chemophysical characteristics. For instance, natural biopolymer such as COL, hyaluronic acid (HA), chitosan (CS) and alginate are widely used in the preparation of scaffold for tissue engineering since they offer high biocompatibility in terms of cell adhesion and proliferation (18-19-20-21-22-23-24-25-26-27-28). On the other hand, the mechanical properties of natural biopolymers are usually weaker if compared with synthetic polymers or inorganic biomaterials (1), with some exceptions such as silk fibroin (29). Among the widely different types of synthetic polymers used in tissue engineering applications, the most relevant are polylactic acid (PLA), polycaprolactone (PCL), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), polyethylene glycol (PEG) and biodegradable polyurethane (PU) (30-31-32-33-34-35-36-37-38). In general, they offer a wider range of chemophysical properties, controlled molecular weight distribution and easy processability (39-40-41-42). At the same time, several synthetic polymers show hydrophobic behavior and are often surface modified or blended with hydrophilic polymers to enhance cell adhesion and growth (43-44-45-46-47-48-49).
In general, FGS fabrication strategies can be categorized as (i) bilayered or (ii) multilayered, depending on the number of layers making up the whole structure. In other cases, scaffolds are characterized by a continuous gradient of one or more specific properties that cannot be related to the presence of clearly distinguished layers. Furthermore, FGS can be multiphasic (15, 50, 51) or monophasic (43, 46, 52) since a single material can also be used to produce multilayered scaffolds if significant variations in physical properties among the layers (i.e., porosity, pore size or pore shape) are present.
Bilayer structures are usually intended for scaffolds designed for osteochondral repairs. In fact, osteochondral defects involve both bone and cartilage as well as their interface. Thus, the possibility of tuning specific tailored properties in different regions of the scaffold by just integrating 2 layers with different chemophysical properties is a key challenge that can lead to superior osteochondral repair, compared with monolayered scaffolds.
Multilayer systems are characterized by 3 or more layers in a single structure to achieve a gradient of properties such as pore size (4, 43, 46, 53-54-55-56-57), pore shape (58), mineral content (24, 59, 60) or chemical cues (15, 56, 61-62-63-64-65-66-67). Multilayer scaffolds are usually designed for osteochondral repairs (15, 43, 46, 56, 57, 60), but they were also developed for cranial (67), vascular (68), human dermis (54) and tendon–bone interface (62) regeneration.
The principal alternatives to bilayer and multilayer scaffolds are the continuous gradient scaffolds. These scaffolds may overcome the problem of inefficient binding between different layers while displaying a continuous change in terms of material composition, pore architecture or growth factor types.
Several recent reviews have focused on describing FGSs and their common applications for osteochondral and other interface tissues (1, 13, 52, 69-70-71-72-73-74-75-76-77-78). The present review, far from reconsidering all of the FGS applications, will provide a brief overview of the main strategies adopted by the scientific community to fabricate bilayered, multilayered and continuous FGS.
Bilayer structures
Several microtechnologies and nanotechnologies have been adopted for the development of both homogenous and heterogeneous bilayer systems. The desired porosity can be achieved either by creating voids throughout a bulk monolith (via particulate leaching, gas foaming or freeze-drying) or by directly fabricating a fibrous mat via electrospinning or computer-aided techniques. Of course, the assembly of different layers into a heterogeneous scaffold may involve a combination of the aforementioned approaches, as summarized in Table I.
Summary of key features of FGS obtained by bilayer approaches
Several researchers have fabricated bilayer scaffolds by particulate leaching and by freeze-drying techniques, in particular for osteochondral defects. The bilayer architecture offered good mechanical stability and maintained structural integrity while providing a porous architecture that supported cell ingrowth in chondrogenic and osteogenic layers, together with integration with the surrounding environment.
Among these researchers, Qi et al incorporated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into a bilayer PLGA scaffold obtained by leaching gel microspheres. The bilayer system was prepared by solution casting of PLGA in a mold containing gel particles with 2 different size distributions (79). Similarly, Giannoni et al realized highly porous PCL scaffolds combining solvent-casting and particulate-leaching. The porogen agents were sucrose crystals for the bone-facing layer which contains hydroxyapatite (HAp) and mannitol crystals for the cartilage-facing layer (80). Duan et al investigated in vivo the effect of pore size in bilayered PLGA scaffolds fabricated by solvent-casting of PLGA filled with sodium chloride (NaCl) and subsequent water-leaching (81). The pore size distribution of each layer was controlled by sieving the NaCl particles in 2 different ranges. The solvent-casting and NaCl leaching technique was adopted by Chen et al to prepare a bilayer scaffold composed of biodegradable synthetic and naturally derived polymers. The upper layer of the scaffold for cartilage engineering was a COL sponge, while the lower layer for bone engineering was a composite sponge made of PLGA and naturally derived COL (82).
Reem et al demonstrated the enhanced regenerative properties of a hydrogel designed for subchondral repairs obtained by freeze-drying. The scaffold was filled in the upper and lower regions with 2 different grow factor types to induce the differentiation of MSCs (83). Martínez Ávila et al fabricated a bilayer bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) scaffold for auricular cartilage composed of a dense nanocellulose layer joined with a macroporous layer of BNC/alginate (84). The bilayer scaffold was assembled by solvent interdiffusion among the layers before the freeze-drying step. Niederauer et al prepared 4 types of PLGA-based bilayered implants. To vary stiffness and chemical properties of the constructs, they used different additives at different concentrations (85). In this case, the layers were assembled by using a solvent as a glue.
Bi et al developed a heterogenous bilayer scaffold for osteochondral regeneration by solvent-casting and freeze-drying. They used a CS-COL composite for the chondral phase and a bioactive glass-COL for the osseous region. The interlayer adhesion was ensured by interconnecting the COL via cross-linking agents (86). For the same purpose, Schleicher et al fabricated bilayer scaffolds was made up of either HAp/COL or allogeneic sterilized bone/COL via solvent-casting plus freeze-drying. The integration of the 2 layers was ensured by the COL that acted as a glue for the different phases. The scaffolds’ efficiency was evaluated in a sheep model, and the sample based on allogeneic sterilized bone/COL displayed more stability and higher capacity to be integrated in the short term (87). A 3D heterogeneous bilayer scaffold was prepared by Deng et al to repair large defects in rabbit joints (88). The scaffold consisted of 2 distinct and integrated layers corresponding to the cartilage and bone tissue. The upper layer, made with gelatin, chondroitin sulphate and sodium hyaluronate, and the lower layer, which consisted of gelatin and ceramic bovine bone, were assembled using cross-linking agents. The scaffolds investigated showed an encouraging efficacy in repairing large defects in rabbit joints.
Marrella et al adopted a procedure combining centrifugation and freeze-drying techniques, to prepare porous scaffold made by PCL and COL type I (89). A functional gradient was combined to the morphological one by adding HAp powders to mimic the bone mineral phase. Results showed that 3D bioactive morphologically and chemically graded grafts could be properly designed and realized, in agreement with the theoretical model. Monteiro et al presented a novel approach to developing bilayer scaffolds for skin tissue engineering, able to combine certain specific properties of the epidermis and the dermis (90). They used the spray-assisted layer-by-layer assembly technique to deposit a polyelectrolyte multilayer film made by HA and poly-L-lysine on a porous HA scaffold. The bilayer film promoted cell adhesion, thus contributing to regeneration of the epidermal barrier functions of skin.
Reyes et al prepared a bilayer scaffold consisting of PLGA and alginate for the sustained delivery of 2 different growth factors. A bone-orientated, porous PLGA cylinder was prepared via gas foaming, overlaid with PLGA microspheres containing various amounts of grow factors, and dispersed in an alginate matrix via cross-linking and subsequent freeze-drying. Release kinetics and tissue distributions were determined by in vitro and in vivo experiments (91).
The solvent-based approach presents several issues related to toxic solvent utilization, in terms of solvent removal and environmental risks (92). Nevertheless, it allows the achieving of versatile structures by tailoring the concentration and localization of additives, such as growth factors, enzymes and proteins, via chemical reactions in solution. Furthermore, among the techniques used to create voids, freeze-drying permits us to achieve extremely high degrees of porosity (37).
Melt-based approaches
Scaffaro et al prepared a heterogeneous bilayered scaffold in the melt. The authors combined melt-mixing, compression-molding and particulate-leaching to integrate a PLA layer with pores around 100 µm with a PCL layer with pores around 20 µm. NaCl sieved in 2 fractions (0-40 µm and 90-110 µm) was used as template. The tunable pore architecture combined with the different chemophysical properties of the 2 polymers in a heterogeneous bilayered scaffold presenting well-adhered layers, as demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis (Fig. 2) and tensile mechanical tests (50). Similarly, Ghosh et al processed a homogeneous bilayered PLA porous scaffold by compression molding followed by leaching. On the cartilage side, starch was added, while in the bone region, which required greater stiffness and strength, HAp was used as a reinforcement (93).
(A) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of melt-developed heterogenous bilayer scaffold. Polylactic acid (PLA) with pore sizes in the range 90-110 µm is shown on the top, and polycaprolactone (PCL) with pore sizes in the range 10-40 µm on the bottom. (B) Higher magnification image of the tidemark demonstrates the high adhesion between the layers. Reproduced from (50) with permission from Elsevier.
Basically, the main advantages related to the melt-based approach refer to the absence of toxic solvents and to the possibility of tuning the porosity and pore size by simply tailoring the size and concentration of porogen agents. However, this technique presents some drawbacks, such as the difficulty of achieving complex structures or the impossibility of fabricating continuously graded structures, as will be discussed in further paragraphs below.
Computer-aided techniques
Bilayer scaffolds of appropriate geometry can be realized by computer-aided techniques, such as rapid prototyping, image-based design (IBD) and solid free-form fabrication (SFF). Sherwood et al developed a composite PLGA scaffold using the TheriForm™ printing process where the external and internal architectures were created via IBD. The versatility of the technology allowed for varying the material composition, shapes, porosity and mechanical properties throughout the scaffold structure (94). Shao et al assessed the feasibility and potentiality of a hybrid scaffold in large and high-load bearing osteochondral defect repair (95). The bone component was mimicked by PCL, while the soft component (cartilage part) was made of fibrin glue. The results demonstrated that PCL scaffold is a potential matrix for osteochondral bone regeneration, whereas fibrin glue does not inherit the physical properties to promote cartilage regeneration in a large and high-load bearing defect site. Schek et al fabricated an osteochondral implant for temporomandibular joint repair (96). IBD and SFF were used to generate load-bearing scaffolds capable of matching patient and defect site geometry. Biphasic composite scaffolds were manufactured, simultaneously generating bone and cartilage in discrete regions.
As one of the most advanced and promising technologies in tissue engineering, 3D-bioprinting combines SFF and precise placement of cells and other biological factors to the desired 2D and 3D positions. It is described as a precise approach for delivering biomaterials, cells and supporting biological factors to the targeted locations with spatial control to fabricate functionally graded 3D constructs.
Other methods and hybrid methods
Pu et al have fabricated bilayer homogenous PLA fibrous scaffolds by a novel electrospinning technique which uses 2 slowly rotating parallel disks as the collector (Fig. 3). The structure, consisting of a thin aligned-fiber layer (AFL) and a random-fiber layer (RFL), showed gradual variation of porosity and fiber alignment along the thickness. The dense structure of AFL provided the mechanical strength, while the high porosity of RFL enhanced cell infiltration, proliferation and distribution (97, 98).
Schematic of the electrospinning apparatus for the development of a bilayer homogenous scaffold. (A) Initial stage: an aluminum mandrel consisting of a rod and 2 parallel disks is used to collect the polymer fibers ejected from the syringe needle; (B) intermediate stage: initial fiber deposition results in fiber alignment between the 2 parallel disks; (C) final bilayer scaffold consisting of an aligned-fiber layer (AFL) and a random-fiber layer (RFL) is produced between the aluminum disks. Reproduced from (98) with permission from Elsevier.
Uma Maheshwari et al prepared bilayer composites based on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), HAp and PCL for bone tissue engineering. Both polymers were loaded with nanoparticles and then electrospun to form a bilayer composite mat, consisting of a hard component (PVA-HAp) and a soft layer (PCL-HAp) (99). Zhang et al prepared bilayer COL/microporous electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for enhancing the osteochondral regeneration (100). PLA fibers were produced via electrospinning. COL layer was deposited onto PLA nanomat, and bilayer microporous scaffolds (COL-nanofiber) were produced via freeze-drying.
To repair oromaxillary defects, Giannitelli et al studied different foaming conditions to determine the best performance of PU graded foams consisting of a dense shell and a porous core for cell infiltration (38). Salerno et al fabricated the 2 layers of an osteochondral biomimetic PCL/HAp scaffold, by melt-mixing and compression-molding, followed by a foaming process with carbon dioxide (CO2) and NaCl leaching (101). Deepthi et al developed CS-HA hydrogel–coated PCL multiscale bilayer scaffolds for ligament regeneration (102). They fabricated either aligned or random multiscale fibers, observing that the coated scaffolds showed improved protein adsorption and cytocompatibility, and higher cell retention.
Solvent-processing, freeze-drying and sintering were combined by Oliveira et al to prepare HAp/CS bilayered scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering applications (103). In more detail, the HAp layer was created by impregnating a PU sponge with HAp powder. The composite sponge was then burned to remove the polymer, and finally sintered. The CS layer was prepared by dissolving the CS in acetic acid, transferring the CS solution onto HAp scaffolds placed into cylindrical molds and then finally freeze-dried. The materials showed no cytotoxic effect. For the same purpose, Jiang et al prepared bilayered stratified polymer ceramic-hydrogel scaffolds (104). In this case, the technique adopted was a combination of water/oil/water emulsion and sintering methods. Specifically, scaffolds based on agarose hydrogel and composite microspheres of PLGA and bioactive glass (BG) were fabricated and optimized for chondrocyte density and microsphere composition. Although this approach involves complex protocols, it represents a viable strategy to tune the properties of each single layer and achieve high regenerative performances.
Multilayer structures
Preparation routes for the development of multilayer scaffolds include principally freeze-drying (54, 57, 59-60-61-62-63), particulate-leaching (43, 46, 51, 55, 58) and electrospinning (64, 67), but in many cases, the literature reports hybrid technologies combining different methods, such as thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) (4) or supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) (58) as summarized in Table II. Several methods are based on multistep processes that involve the reiterative assembling of 1 layer onto the previous one, combining the same or different materials.
Summary of the main key features of FGS obtained by multilayer approaches
Scaffaro et al prepared homogenous 3-layered scaffolds in PCL and in PLA presenting pore size distribution that gradually changed from 20 µm to 110 µm (Fig. 4). The authors combined melt-mixing, compression-molding and particulate leaching. In brief, PCL or PLA, PEG and NaCl sieved in 3 fractions were melt-blended, melt-assembled and then put in distilled water as shown schematically in Figure 5. For both PLA and PCL, the resulting structures were characterized by well-adherent layers with different pore sizes, without loss of continuity or interface fracture (46, 105). The same authors prepared a heterogeneous 3-layered scaffold integrating PCL (shell) and PLA (core) by adapting the method described above (51).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of a polylactic acid (PLA)–based homogeneous 3-layer scaffold with a gradient of pore sizes. The pore size distribution of each layer was controlled by the NaCl particle size filled in the PLA matrix during the melt. The layers were assembled by compression-molding before water-leaching and drying. The monolithic structure is characterized by well interconnected porous structure without loss of continuity between the layers. Reproduced from (46) with permission from Elsevier.
(A) Schematic of the multistage preparation route of a 3-layer homogeneous scaffold: salt-sieved and the polylactic acid (PLA) were dried and blended to polyethylene glycol (PEG) using a batch mixer. The materials obtained were formed in single-layer discs through compression-molding, and afterwards they were leached and characterized, or assembled in a 3-layer compression-molding and subsequently leached and characterized. (B) Schematic representation of the pore size distribution gradient of the scaffold together with the cell lines cultivated onto each side of the device. Reprinted from (46) with permission from Elsevier.
Tang et al developed (PLGA) scaffolds with graded pores size for osteochondral repairs. Gelatin microspheres with 3 different diameters (350-450 µm, 200-350 µm and 80-200 µm) were used as a template in which a PLGA solution was cast. The system was then freeze-dried and finally put into hot distilled water for 12 hours to leach out the porogen agents. The scaffolds exhibited a porosity as high as about 95% and a gradient of pore sizes across the cylindrical axis (55).
Finally, particulate-leaching allows the tuning of the porosity and pore size by simply tailoring the size and concentration of porogen agents. On the other hand, the pore shape is strongly affected by the porogen geometry, which is difficult to control.
Freeze-drying
The versatility of freeze-drying lies in the possibility of obtaining multilayer constructs via an iterative technique that allows the material composition and scaffold microarchitecture to be specifically tailored in each region of the scaffold. Levingstone et al adopted this method to prepare 3-layered scaffold mimicking the native composition of subchondral bone ECM. The articular cartilage-mimicking layer, was composed of a rich glycosaminoglycan content and type II COL. The cartilage-mimicking layer of the scaffold was made of type I COL, type II COL and HA. Finally, the bone-mimicking layer was prepared with type I COL and HA (61). Zhu et al used a similar approach to fabricate a CS-based 4-layered scaffold presenting a porous structure able to mimic the cartilage ECM. The COL/CH–PCL/CS scaffolds presented hierarchically distributed average pore sizes and porosity, as well as an interconnected porous structure (57).
Kon et al, Yusong et al and Algul et al prepared 3-layered scaffolds made of CH, gel and COL, respectively, by overlapping layers with increasing amounts of mineral phases. The assembled layers were then freeze-dried obtaining a biomimetic interconnected porous structure (59, 60, 106). Similarly, Kim et al prepared a human COL-based 4-layered scaffold with a tailored material composition that was designed for the repair of the tendon-to-bone region. Different materials were chosen to build each layer as follows: (i) COL for the tendon layer; (ii) COL and chondroitin sulfate for the uncalcified fibrocartilage layer; (iii) COL and a small amount of apatite for the calcified fibrocartilage layer; (iv) COL and apatite made up the bone layer. The 4 layers were then assembled by an iterative freeze-drying method (62).
Wang et al used COL type I to prepare a 3-layer scaffold designed for the regeneration of human dermis. Solutions containing COL type I at different concentrations were separately frozen at -80°C and then freeze-dried together. The mean pore size of the scaffolds increased upon increasing the COL concentration. The authors demonstrated that the “sandwich” COL scaffolds significantly promoted wound healing, especially if compared with homogeneous scaffolds displaying a uniform pore size (54). Tampieri et al developed a composite osteochondral scaffold organized in different integrated COL-based layers. The authors piled up the layers onto each other; thereafter, a knitting procedure was used at each interface to ensure good layer integration, thus avoiding delamination at the interfaces. Finally, freeze-drying under vacuum conditions was performed to obtain the porous structure (63).
The main advantage of freeze-drying lies in the possibility of obtaining highly porous, multilayer constructs through an iterative technique that can be adopted for a wide range of polymers. On the other hand, the method is not easy to scale up to an industrial level, and it is usually adopted for small prototypes.
Electrospinning
Multilayer electrospun scaffolds are usually developed by consecutively electrospinning different materials. Wang et al used this technique to prepare a 3-layer scaffold for cranial defects. The inner PLA layer was designed to reduce tissue adhesion on the brain. The middle layer, made of a PLA/PCL blend, was designed to avoid water infiltration. Finally, the COL-based outer layer was designed to promote cell adhesion. Mechanical and in vivo biological tests demonstrated that the multilayer scaffold had sufficient mechanical strength and adequate biochemical properties to be potentially used for dural cranial repairs (67). Bye et al used the same approach to prepare poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV)/PCL or PLA multilayer scaffolds demonstrating the reliability of these systems as biobarriers for preventing cell penetration (64).
Electrospinning is a versatile technique for fabricating nanoscale and microscale fibers, and has great potential for mimicking the microenvironment of natural ECM by controlling a large number of parameters such as flow rate, potential, distance between syringe and collector and so on. Moreover, this approach allows the preparation of scaffolds consisting of different layers more easily compared with the other technique. On the other hand, the intrinsic morphology of the porous structures is often difficult for cells to permeate, without specific precautions.
Other methods and hybrid methods
Mi et al prepared a small-diameter vascular scaffold composed of 3 different layers: a porous outer layer made of thermoplastic PU, a woven silk filament middle layer and a nanofibrous inner layer again in PU. The FGS was fabricated by a multiple-step protocol involving thermally induced phase separation, braiding and electrospinning techniques. The different layers provided the scaffold with better mechanical properties when compared with those observed in each single layer taken separately (107).
Aydin et al produced a structure for the regeneration of defects of articular cartilage composed of 3 distinct layers. The bone-mimicking layer was fabricated from a PLA/PCL polymeric blend dissolved in chloroform and mixed with NaCl. In a second stage, scCO2 was used to enhance the interconnectivity of the monoliths. The PLGA-based upper layer was a nonwoven felt. Finally, vertical channels were formed, starting from the bone layer to the intermediate layer, using stainless steel pins. The channels were designed to facilitate the delivery of osteogenic and chondrogenic clues from bone marrow to then eventually be transformed into Haversian channels (58).
Nie et al prepared a homogeneous 3-layered scaffold made of PLA, combining TIPS and sugar particle leaching. The macropore size gradient was obtained by controlling the sugar particle sizes from 300 µm to 600 µm as well as porosity and interconnectivity. The scaffolds were prepared by packing the sugar spheres in a gradient shape and then casting PLA/dioxane solution under vacuum. Subsequently, the system was freeze-dried, and finally the sugar was leached out in distilled water. The average pore size, as well as the average interpore opening size, was controlled by the average diameter of the sugar spheres (4).
Combining different technologies to obtain a multilayer scaffold offers the possibility of tuning the characteristics of each single region with an high degree of control in terms of mechanical, structural and chemical properties. Conversely, this approach requires complex protocols, thus hindering any industrial scalability of these approaches.
Continuously graded structures
The development of continuously graded structures requires a slightly different approach from that for discretely graded structures. Based on the works reported in the literature, it can be noted that often the combination of at least 2 technique is necessary, as summarized in Table III.
Summary of the main key features of FGS obtained by continuous gradient approaches
Liu et al reported an in situ diffusion method for the fabrication of compositionally graded COL/HAp composite scaffolds (108). Chemical and microstructural analyses revealed a gradient of the Ca/P ratio across the width of the COL scaffold template, resulting in the formation of a calcium-enriched side and a calcium-depleted side of scaffold. Dormer et al fabricated a FGS by encapsulating proteins in polymer droplets, achieved by ultrasonication (109). The resulting polymer microspheres, containing a graded amount of proteins, were then sintered and freeze-dried to achieve the final structure. The results highlighted that continuous gradients in bioactive signals allowed the temporal and spatial release of appropriate growth factors for the osteochondral regeneration.
A similar approach was previously adopted by Wang et al (110). In this case, 2 growth factors, bone morphogenetic protein 2 and insulin-like growth factor I, were incorporated as a single concentration gradient or reverse gradient combining 2 factors in the scaffolds. Bai et al fabricated biomimetic scaffolds by freeze-casting a slurry of HAp particles (111). The slurry, containing nanoparticles and various reactants such as surfactants and polymers (i.e., PEG and Aquazol), was ball-milled and freeze-casted. During the freezing process, lamellar ice crystals grew preferentially from the copper rod outward to the plastic mold, generating a gradient in their thickness. At the same time, HAp particles were expelled and assembled to replicate the structure of ice crystals. The authors were able to achieve interconnected gradient channels mimicking the porous network of natural bone.
Harley et al adopted a “liquid-phase co-synthesis” technique that was found to enable the production of porous, layered scaffolds mimicking the composition and structure of articular cartilage on one side, subchondral bone on the other side, and a continuous, gradual or soft interface between the 2 tissues (i.e., articular joints) (5). Liquid-phase co-synthesis interdiffusion of unmineralized, type II COL-glycosaminoglycan (CG) and mineralized (reinforced with CaP nanoparticles), type I COL-glycosaminoglycan (CG-CaP) suspensions were subsequently freeze-dried.
Mannella et al developed a porous scaffold with a pore size gradient by TIPS, achieved by imposing a different thermal history on the 2 sides of a polymeric solution, consisting of PLA, dioxane and water (112). The authors demonstrated the possibility of tuning the pore size range by controlling and manipulating some key parameters, such as demixing temperature and residence time in the miscibility gap region.
In some cases, the solvent-based technique is combined with UV-assisted reactions, such as photopolymerization or cross-linking to fabricate continuous graded scaffolds (113). Two different macromers (each one in its own appropriate solvent) and photocatalyst solutions were used to prepare a functionalized star polydimethylsiloxane, processable in dichloromethane, and a modified PEG. The continuous gradient of the scaffold was achieved by a gradient maker, whereas the integration of the 2 polymers was ensured by UV-assisted cross-linking. The results demonstrated spatial variation in morphology, bioactivity, swelling and elastic modulus.
Nemir et al used PEG dimethacrylate (PEGDM) hydrogels, with varying polymer chain length, and photolithographic patterning techniques to provide substrates with spatially tunable mechanical properties in both gradients and distinct patterns (114). The hydrogels were patterned to produce anisotropic structures exhibiting patterned strain under mechanical loading. Similarly, Chatterjee et al prepared PEGDM hydrogel, which gradient was imparted by mixing two PEGDM solutions (at different concentration) containing suspended cells in the stock chambers of a gradient maker (115). The prepolymer solution was then polymerized through the glass slide of the mold by exposure to UV. Hill et al fabricated photocrosslinkable dextran hydrogels containing a gradient of siRNA, using a dual-programmable syringe pump system, and showed a differential gene silencing in incorporated cells sustained over time (116). More recently, selective photopolymerization of PEGDM and epoxy monomers was used to provide tunable elasticity in a multimaterial hydrogel (117).
Electrospinning
He et al fabricated nanofibrous scaffolds with continuous structure and composition gradients in 2 electrospinning steps (118). In the first step, a PLGA solution was moved back and forth along the axis of the collector, rotating at high speed to produce aligned nanofibers. Two hours later, the PLGA loaded with HAp nanoparticles was electrospun onto the exposed aligned nanomat previously realized. In this case, the collector was kept at low rotation speed and 30 degree swinging to produce a randomly oriented PLGA-HAp mat. The different distance between needle and cylindrical surface in the 2 steps enabled the formation of a thickness gradient at the boundary of the aligned and random nanomats along the circumferential direction of the collector. Owing to these features, the FGS possessed a structural and chemical gradient. Lipner et al created PLGA nanofibrous scaffolds by electrospinning (119). Thereafter, the nanomats were cut into small pieces, plasma-treated to enhance their hydrophilicity and coupled with CS to promote the attachment of calcium ions, thus enabling mineral nucleation.
Tzezana et al prepared electrospun PCL fibers loaded with all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA), designed to release ATRA at a predetermined rate, due to morphogenic gradients throughout the thickness of hydrospun scaffolds (120). The structures were then exposed to flow conditions in a bioreactor, and gradient formation was verified by a convection-diffusion mathematical model, which proved a continuous solute gradient across the scaffold.
Zou et al prepared electrospun fibers with graded contents of amino groups, with the latter being generated through an aminolysis process using a microinfusion pump (121). Gelatin grafts allowed the creation of fibrous scaffolds with gradients in HAp contents, crystal size and mechanical properties through in situ mineralization. Plasmid DNA (pDNA) was included during the mineralization process, and gradations in pDNA loading contents were created on fibrous scaffolds, strongly depending on HAp gradients. Gradients in the amount of pDNA released and the expression of target proteins provided a temporally and spatially controlled delivery of growth factors in scaffolds. Hence, after cell seeding, the fibrous mats displayed gradients in cell density, osteoblastic differentiation and COL deposition along the longitudinal axis.
Other methods and hybrid methods
Erisken et al fabricated functionally graded nonwoven meshes of PCL incorporated with tricalcium phosphate (TCP) nanoparticles using a hybrid twin-screw extrusion/electrospinning process. For this purpose, the multichannel spinneret die of the twin-screw extruder was connected to a high-voltage supply, to permit the time-dependent feeding of various solid and liquid ingredients and their melting, dispersion, deaeration and pressurization together with electrospinning in continuum (122).
Oh et al used a centrifugation-based method to realize a scaffold presenting a gradient pore size distribution increasing along the longitudinal direction. In particular, the scaffolds were prepared in 2 steps: (i) centrifugation and (ii) heating fibril-like PCL in a cylindrical mold. The FGS was achieved by exploiting the gradual increment of the centrifugal force along the axis. Morphological analysis showed a gradual increase of the pore size distribution from 88 to 405 µm that could be easily controlled by tuning the rotational speed (53).
Conclusion and future perspectives
This work provides a brief overview of the main strategies adopted by the scientific community to fabricate bilayered, multilayered and continuous FGS. Several different technologies have been investigated, and often combined, to customize each region of the FGS and to optimize the regeneration performance. The solvent-based approach presents several issues related to toxic solvent utilization. Nevertheless, it allows the achievement of versatile structures by tailoring the localization of additives in specific regions of the scaffolds. On the other hand, melt-based approaches are characterized by the absence of toxic solvents. However, that technique presents some drawbacks, such as the difficulty to achieve complex structures or the impossibility of fabricating continuous graded structures.
As regards the strategies used to create voids, particulate leaching remains one of the most important pathways due to its easy control of pore size distribution and porosity. On the other hand, freeze-drying allows the achievement of scaffolds presenting higher porosity if compared with other methods. Electrospinning allows the creation of a 2D structure with spatially tunable properties, but the nanofibrous morphology is often found to hinder the cell infiltration.
Among the most important future possibilities, computer-aided design permits a very interesting way to prepare scaffold presenting very specific gradients that can be optimized for the individual patient. The major limitation of rapid prototyping lies in the time and cost spent in generation of 3D objects. Furthermore, rapid prototyping can only be applied to structures not exceeding certain dimensions, as 3D printers are not able to produce extremely large models.
Nowadays, the “optimal” technique to prepare FGS is not available because, as discussed above, each method presents its own peculiar advantages and drawbacks. Furthermore, most current therapeutic tissue engineering treatments are intended primarily for relatively small defects, and are immature compared with native tissues. Scientific investigation and engineering design should also look into the creation of bioreactor systems for mechanical stimulation. Finally, in designing tissue engineering grafts, animal studies are considered to be an important validation step. The implantation site has been shown to affect the in vivo outcomes of engineered constructs.
Technology for FGS has advanced rapidly, and further progress in this area will likely have a significant impact on the future clinical success of tissue engineering strategies.
Disclosures
Financial support: This work was supported by Consortium INSTM.
Conflict of interest: None of the authors has any financial interest related to this study to disclose.
References
1.YousefiA-MHoqueMEPrasadRGUthNCurrent strategies in multiphasic scaffold design for osteochondral tissue engineering: a review.J Biomed Mater Res A2015103724602481Google Scholar
2.HollisterSJPorous scaffold design for tissue engineering.Nat Mater201547518524Google Scholar
3.Lo ReGLoprestiFPetrucciGScaffaroRA facile method to determine pore size distribution in porous scaffold by using image processing.Micron2015763745Google Scholar
4.NieTXueLGeMMaHZhangJFabrication of poly(L-lactic acid) tissue engineering scaffolds with precisely controlled gradient structure.Mater Lett20161762528Google Scholar
5.HarleyBALynnAKWissner-GrossZBonfieldWYannasIVGibsonLJDesign of a multiphase osteochondral scaffold III: fabrication of layered scaffolds with continuous interfaces.J Biomed Mater Res A201092310781093Google Scholar
6.NguyenLHKudvaAKSaxenaNSRoyKEngineering articular cartilage with spatially-varying matrix composition and mechanical properties from a single stem cell population using a multi-layered hydrogel.Biomaterials2011322969466952Google Scholar
7.SinghviRKumarALopezGPet al.Engineering cell shape and function.Science, New Series. American Association for the Advancement of Science19942645159696698Google Scholar
8.SoonY-MShinK-HKohY-HLeeJ-HChoiW-YKimH-EFabrication and compressive strength of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds with a functionally graded core/shell structure.J Eur Ceram Soc2011311-21318Google Scholar
9.LevingstoneTJThompsonEMatsikoASchepensAGleesonJPO’BrienFJMulti-layered collagen-based scaffolds for osteochondral defect repair in rabbits.Acta Biomater201632149160Google Scholar
10.KidoakiSMatsudaTMicroelastic gradient gelatinous gels to induce cellular mechanotaxis.J Biotechnol20081332225230Google Scholar
11.CastroNJHackingSAZhangLGRecent progress in interfacial tissue engineering approaches for osteochondral defects.Ann Biomed Eng201240816281640Google Scholar
12.MentePLLewisJLElastic modulus of calcified cartilage is an order of magnitude less than that of subchondral bone.J Orthop Res1994125637647Google Scholar
13.AtesokKDoralMNKarlssonJet al.Multilayer scaffolds in orthopaedic tissue engineering. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc.201424723652373Google Scholar
14.HutmacherDWScaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage.Biomaterials ternet]2000212425292543Google Scholar
15.LienSMChienCHHuangTJA novel osteochondral scaffold of ceramic-gelatin assembly for articular cartilage repair.Mater Sci Eng C2009291315321Google Scholar
16.YazdimamaghaniMRazaviMVashaeeDPothineniVRRajadasJTayebiLSignificant degradability enhancement in multilayer coating of polycaprolactone-bioactive glass/gelatin-bioactive glass on magnesium scaffold for tissue engineering applications.Appl Surf Sci2015338137145Google Scholar
17.HasanMSCarpenterNWeiTLMcNallyDAhmedIBoszczykBMEffects of adding resorbable phosphate glass fibres and PLA to calcium phosphate bone cements.J Appl Biomater Funct Mater2014123203209Google Scholar
18.AlhagMFarrellETonerMLeeTCO’BrienFJClaffeyNEvaluation of the ability of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds with or without mesenchymal stem cells to heal bone defects in Wistar rats.Oral Maxillofac Surg20121614755Google Scholar
19.DuffyGPByrneEMMcFaddenTMFarrelEMO’Brien FJ.In vitro vascularisation of collagen-gag scaffolds using mesenchymal stem cells. Eur Cell Mater200918116Google Scholar
20.MatsikoALevingstoneTJGleesonJPO’BrienFJIncorporation of TGF-beta 3 within collagen-hyaluronic acid scaffolds improves their chondrogenic potential.Adv Healthc Mater20154811751179Google Scholar
21.RafteryRO’BrienFJCryanSAChitosan for gene delivery and orthopedic tissue engineering applications.Molecules201318556115647Google Scholar
22.MehrNGHoemannCDFavisBDChitosan surface modification of fully interconnected 3D porous poly(ε-caprolactone) by the LbL approach.Polymer (Guildf)201564112121Google Scholar
23.WangX-YJinZ-HGanB-WLvS-WXieMHuangW-HEngineering interconnected 3D vascular networks in hydrogels using molded sodium alginate lattice as the sacrificial template.Lab Chip2014141527092716Google Scholar
24.AlgulDSipahiHAydinAKelleciFOzdatliSYenerFGBiocompatibility of biomimetic multilayered alginate–chitosan/β-TCP scaffold for osteochondral tissue.Int J Biol Macromol201579363369Google Scholar
25.ColuccinoLStagnaroPVassalliMScaglioneSBioactive TGF-β1/HA alginate-based scaffolds for osteochondral tissue repair: design, realization and multilevel characterization.J Appl Biomater Funct Mater2016141e42e52Google Scholar
26.HodgkinsonTBayatAIn vitro and ex vivo analysis of hyaluronan supplementation of Integra® dermal template on human dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes.J Appl Biomater Funct Mater2016141e9e18Google Scholar
27.GuptaPNayakKKCompatibility study of alginate/keratin blend for biopolymer development.J Appl Biomater Funct Mater2015134e332e339Google Scholar
28.Martín-LópezENieto-DíazMNieto-SampedroMInfluence of chitosan concentration on cell viability and proliferation in vitro by changing film topography.J Appl Biomater Funct Mater2013113e151e158Google Scholar
29.PalumboFSFioricaCPitarresiGAgnelloSGiammonaGInterpenetrated 3D porous scaffolds of silk fibroin with an amino and octadecyl functionalized hyaluronic acid.RSC Adv20155756144061448Google Scholar
30.DhandayuthapaniBYoshidaYMaekawaTKumarDSPolymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: a review.Int J Polym Sci20112011119Google Scholar
31.LiuXHolzwarthJMMaPXFunctionalized synthetic biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering.Macromol Biosci2012127911919Google Scholar
32.PuppiDChielliniFPirasAMChielliniEPolymeric materials for bone and cartilage repair.Prog Polym Sci2010354403440Google Scholar
33.ScaffaroRLoprestiFSuteraAet al.Effect of PCL/PEG-based membranes on actinorhodin production in streptomyces coelicolor cultivations.Macromol Biosci2016165686693Google Scholar
34.SteffensDRezendeRASantiBet al.3D-printed PCL scaffolds for the cultivation of mesenchymal stem cells.J Appl Biomater Funct Mater2016141e19e25Google Scholar
35.NaghashzargarEFarèSCattoVet al.Nano/micro hybrid scaffold of PCL or P3HB nanofibers combined with silk fibroin for tendon and ligament tissue engineering.J Appl Biomater Funct Mater2015132e156e168Google Scholar
36.LuLZhangQWoottonDMet al.Mechanical study of polycaprolactone-hydroxyapatite porous scaffolds created by porogen-based solid freeform fabrication method.J Appl Biomater Funct Mater2014123145154Google Scholar
37.ScaffaroRMaioALoprestiFet al.Synthesis and self-assembly of a PEGylated-graphene aerogel.Compos Sci Technol2016128193200Google Scholar
38.GiannitelliSMBasoliFMozeticPet al.Graded porous polyurethane foam: a potential scaffold for oro-maxillary bone regeneration.Mater Sci Eng C201551329335Google Scholar
39.ManoJFReisRLOsteochondral defects: present situation and tissue engineering approaches.J Tissue Eng Regen Med200714261273Google Scholar
40.FioreVBottaLScaffaroRValenzaAPirrottaAPLA based biocomposites reinforced with Arundo donax fillers.Compos Sci Technol20141051107Google Scholar
41.ScaffaroRBottaLSanfilippoMGalloGPalazzoloGPugliaAMCombining in the melt physical and biological properties of poly(caprolactone) and chlorhexidine to obtain antimicrobial surgical monofilaments.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol201397199109Google Scholar
42.ScaffaroRMorrealeMMirabellaFLa MantiaFPPreparation and recycling of plasticized PLA.Macromol Mater Eng20112962141150Google Scholar
43.ScaffaroRLoprestiFBottaLRigogliusoSGhersiGPreparation of three-layered porous PLA/PEG scaffold: relationship between morphology, mechanical behavior and cell permeability.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater201654820Google Scholar
45.LukJZCorkJCooper-WhiteJGrindahlLUse of two-step grafting to fabricate dual-functional films and site-specific functionalized scaffolds.Langmuir201531517461754Google Scholar
46.ScaffaroRLoprestiFBottaLRigogliusoSGhersiGMelt processed PCL/PEG scaffold with discrete pore size gradient for selective cellular infiltration.Macromol Mater Eng20163012182190Google Scholar
47.ScaffaroRLo ReGRigogliusoSGhersiG3D polylactide-based scaffolds for studying human hepatocarcinoma processes in vitro.Sci Technol Adv Mater201213445003Google Scholar
48.YangXWangLGuanGet al.Mechanical and biocompatibility performance of bicomponent polyester/silk fibroin small-diameter arterial prostheses.J Appl Biomater Funct Mater2015133e201e209Google Scholar
49.ChangN-JJhungY-RYaoC-KYehM-LHydrophilic gelatin and hyaluronic acid-treated PLGA scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering.J Appl Biomater Funct Mater2013111e45e52Google Scholar
50.ScaffaroRLoprestiFBottaLRigogliusoSGhersiGIntegration of PCL and PLA in a monolithic porous scaffold for interface tissue engineering.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater201663303313Google Scholar
51.ScaffaroRLoprestiFBottaLMaioAMechanical behavior of polylactic acid/polycaprolactone porous layered functional composites.Compos Part B Eng2016987077Google Scholar
52.SeidiARamalingamMElloumi-HannachiIOstrovidovSKhademhosseiniAGradient biomaterials for soft-to-hard interface tissue engineering.Acta Biomater20117414411451Google Scholar
53.OhSHParkIKKimJMLeeJHIn vitro and in vivo characteristics of PCL scaffolds with pore size gradient fabricated by a centrifugation method.Biomaterials200728916641671Google Scholar
54.WangYXuRLuoGLeiQShuQYaoZet al.Biomimetic fibroblast-loaded artificial dermis with “sandwich” structure and designed gradient pore sizes promotes wound healing by favoring granulation tissue formation and wound re-epithelialization.Acta Biomater20163024657Google Scholar
55.TangGZhangHZhaoYZhangYLiXYuanXPreparation of PLGA scaffolds with graded pores by using a gelatin-microsphere template as porogen.J Biomater Sci Polym Ed2012231722412257Google Scholar
56.Sadat-ShojaiMKhorasaniMTJamshidiAA new strategy for fabrication of bone scaffolds using electrospun nano-HAp/PHB fibers and protein hydrogels.Chem Eng J20162893847Google Scholar
57.ZhuYWuHSunSZhouTWuJWanYDesigned composites for mimicking compressive mechanical properties of articular cartilage matrix.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2014363246Google Scholar
58.AydinHMA three-layered osteochondral plug: structural, mechanical, and in vitro biocompatibility analysis.Adv Eng Mater20111312511517Google Scholar
59.YusongPQianqianSChenglingPJingWPrediction of mechanical properties of multilayer gradient hydroxyapatite reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) gel biomaterial.J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater20131015729735Google Scholar
60.KonEDelcoglianoMFilardoGet al.Orderly osteochondral regeneration in a sheep model using a novel nano-composite multilayered biomaterial.J Orthop Res2010281116124Google Scholar
61.LevingstoneTJMatsikoADicksonGRO’BrienFJGleesonJPA biomimetic multi-layered collagen-based scaffold for osteochondral repair.Acta Biomater201410519962004Google Scholar
62.KimBSKimEJChoiJSJeongJHJoCHChoYWHuman collagen-based multilayer scaffolds for tendon-to-bone interface tissue engineering.J Biomed Mater Res A20141021140444054Google Scholar
63.TampieriASandriMLandiEet al.Design of graded biomimetic osteochondral composite scaffolds.Biomaterials2008292635393546Google Scholar
64.ByeFJBissoliJBlackLet al.Development of bilayer and trilayer nanofibrous/microfibrous scaffolds for regenerative medicine.Biomater Sci201319942951Google Scholar
65.MiYZhouWLiQet al.Preparation of water-in-oil emulsions using a hydrophobic polymer membrane with 3D bicontinuous skeleton structure.J Membr Sci2015490113119Google Scholar
66.DingSLiLLiuXYangGZhouGZhouSA nano-micro alternating multilayer scaffold loading with rBMSCs and BMP-2 for bone tissue engineering.Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces2015133286295Google Scholar
67.WangYFGuoHFYingDJMultilayer scaffold of electrospun PLA-PCL-collagen nanofibers as a dural substitute.J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater2013101813591366Google Scholar
68.MiH-YJingXYuEMcNultyJPengX-FTurngL-SFabrication of triple-layered vascular scaffolds by combining electrospinning, braiding, and thermally induced phase separation.Mater Lett. Elsevier2015161305308Google Scholar
70.FontTellado SBalmayorERVan GriensvenMStrategies to engineer tendon/ligament-to-bone interface: biomaterials, cells and growth factors.Adv Drug Deliv Rev201594126140Google Scholar
71.SamorezovJEAlsbergESpatial regulation of controlled bioactive factor delivery for bone tissue engineering.Adv Drug Deliv Rev2015844567Google Scholar
72.GiannitelliSMAccotoDTrombettaMRainerACurrent trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering.Acta Biomater2014102580594Google Scholar
73.DormerNHBerklandCJDetamoreMSEmerging techniques in stratified designs and continuous gradients for tissue engineering of interfaces.Ann Biomed Eng201038621212141Google Scholar
74.LopaSMadryHBioinspired scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration.Tissue Eng Part A20142015-1620522076Google Scholar
75.JiangTCarboneEJLoKW-HLaurencinCTElectrospinning of polymer nanofibers for tissue regeneration.Prog Polym Sci201446124Google Scholar
76.LuHHThomopoulosSFunctional attachment of soft tissues to bone: development, healing, and tissue engineering.Annu Rev Biomed Eng201315201226Google Scholar
77.SolaABellucciDCannilloVFunctionally graded materials for orthopedic applications: an update on design and manufacturing.Biotechnol Adv201634550431Google Scholar
78.NguyenEHSchwartzMPMurphyWLBiomimetic approaches to control soluble concentration gradients in biomaterials.Macromol Biosci2011114483492Google Scholar
79.QiYDuYLiWDaiXZhaoTYanWCartilage repair using mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) sheet and MSCs-loaded bilayer PLGA scaffold in a rabbit model.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc201422614241433Google Scholar
80.GiannoniPLazzariniECeseracciuLBaroneACQuartoRScaglioneSDesign and characterization of a tissue-engineered bilayer scaffold for osteochondral tissue repair.J Tissue Eng Regen Med201591011821192Google Scholar
81.DuanPPanZCaoLet al.The effects of pore size in bilayered poly(lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds on restoring osteochondral defects in rabbits.J Biomed Mater Res A20141021180192Google Scholar
82.ChenGSatoTTanakaJTateishiTPreparation of a biphasic scaffold for osteochondral tissue engineering.Mater Sci Eng C2006261118123Google Scholar
83.ReemTWitteFWillboldERuvinovECohenSSimultaneous regeneration of articular cartilage and subchondral bone induced by spatially presented TGF-beta and BMP-4 in a bilayer affinity binding system.Acta Biomater20128932833293Google Scholar
84.MartínezÁvila HFeldmannE-MPleumeekersMMet al.Novel bilayer bacterial nanocellulose scaffold supports neocartilage formation in vitro and in vivo.Biomaterials201544122133Google Scholar
85.NiederauerGGSlivkaMALeatherburyNCet al.Evaluation of multiphase implants for repair of focal osteochondral defects in goats.Biomaterials2000212425612574Google Scholar
86.BiLLiDLiuJet al.Fabrication and characterization of a biphasic scaffold for osteochondral tissue engineering.Mater Lett2011651320792082Google Scholar
87.SchleicherILipsKSSommerUet al.Biphasic scaffolds for repair of deep osteochondral defects in a sheep model.J Surg Res20131831184192Google Scholar
88.DengTLvJPangJLiuBKeJConstruction of tissue-engineered osteochondral composites and repair of large joint defects in rabbit.J Tissue Eng Regen Med201487546556Google Scholar
89.MarrellaAAielloMQuartoRScaglioneSChemical and morphological gradient scaffolds to mimic hierarchically complex tissues: from theoretical modeling to their fabrication.Biotechnol Bioeng20161131022862297Google Scholar
90.MonteiroIPShuklaAMarquesAPReisRLHammondPTSpray-assisted layer-by-layer assembly on hyaluronic acid scaffolds for skin tissue engineering.J Biomed Mater Res A20151031330340Google Scholar
91.ReyesRDelgadoASánchezEFernándezAHernándezAEvoraCRepair of an osteochondral defect by sustained delivery of BMP-2 or TGFβ1 from a bilayered alginate-PLGA scaffold.J Tissue Eng Regen Med201487521533Google Scholar
92.MaioAFucarinoRKhatibiRRosselliSBrunoMScaffaroRA novel approach to prevent graphene oxide re-aggregation during the melt compounding with polymers.Compos Sci Technol2015119131137Google Scholar
93.GhoshSVianaJCReisRLManoJFBi-layered constructs based on poly(l-lactic acid) and starch for tissue engineering of osteochondral defects.Mater Sci Eng C20082818086Google Scholar
95.ShaoXXHutmacherDWHoSTGohJCLeeEHEvaluation of a hybrid scaffold/cell construct in repair of high-load-bearing osteochondral defects in rabbits.Biomaterials200627710711080Google Scholar
97.PuJKomvopoulosKMechanical properties of electrospun bilayer fibrous membranes as potential scaffolds for tissue engineering.Acta Biomater201410627182726Google Scholar
98.PuJYuanFLiSKomvopoulosKElectrospun bilayer fibrous scaffolds for enhanced cell infiltration and vascularization in vivo.Acta Biomater201513131141Google Scholar
99.UmaMaheshwari SSamuelVKNagiahNFabrication and evaluation of (PVA/HAp/PCL) bilayer composites as potential scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration application.Ceram Int201440684698477Google Scholar
101.SalernoAIannaceSNettiPAGraded biomimetic osteochondral scaffold prepared via CO 2 foaming and micronized NaCl leaching.Mater Lett201282137140Google Scholar
102.DeepthiSJeevithaKNivedhithaSundaram MChennazhiKPJayakumarRChitosan-hyaluronic acid hydrogel coated poly(caprolactone) multiscale bilayer scaffold for ligament regeneration.Chem Eng J2015260478485Google Scholar
103.OliveiraJMRodriguesMTSilvaSSet al.Novel hydroxyapatite/chitosan bilayered scaffold for osteochondral tissue-engineering applications: scaffold design and its performance when seeded with goat bone marrow stromal cells.Biomaterials2006273661236137Google Scholar
105.ScaffaroRLoprestiFBottaLRigogliusoSGhersiGPreparation of three-layered porous PLA/PEG scaffold : relationship between morphology, mechanical behavior and cell permeability.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater201654820Google Scholar
106.AlgulDSipahiHAydinAKelleciFOzdatliSYenerFGBiocompatibility of biomimetic multilayered alginate–chitosan/β-TCP scaffold for osteochondral tissue.Int J Biol Macromol201579363369Google Scholar
107.MiH-YJingXYuEMcNultyJPengX-FTurngL-SFabrication of triple-layered vascular scaffolds by combining electrospinning, braiding, and thermally induced phase separation.Mater Lett2015161305308Google Scholar
108.LiuCHanZCzernuszkaJTGradient collagen/nanohydroxyapatite composite scaffold: development and characterization.Acta Biomater200952661669Google Scholar
109.DormerNHSinghMZhaoLMohanNBerklandCJDetamoreMSOsteochondral interface regeneration of the rabbit knee with macroscopic gradients of bioactive signals.J Biomed Mater Res Part A2012100A162170Google Scholar
110.WangXWenkEZhangXMeinelLVunjak-novakovicGKaplanDLGrowth factor gradients via microsphere delivery in biopolymer scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering.J Control Release200913428190Google Scholar
111.BaiHWangDDelattreBet al.Biomimetic gradient scaffold from ice-templating for self-seeding of cells with capillary effect.Acta Biomater201520113119Google Scholar
112.MannellaGAConoscentiGPaviaFCLa CarrubbaVBrucatoVPreparation of polymeric foams with a pore size gradient via thermally induced phase separation (TIPS).Mater Lett20151603133Google Scholar
113.BaileyBMNailLNGrunlanMAContinuous gradient scaffolds for rapid screening of cell–material interactions and interfacial tissue regeneration.Acta Biomater20139982548261Google Scholar
114.NemirSHayengaHNWestJLPEGDA hydrogels with patterned elasticity: novel tools for the study of cell response to substrate rigidity.Biotechnol Bioeng20101053636644Google Scholar
115.ChatterjeeKLin-GibsonSWallaceWEet al.The effect of 3D hydrogel scaffold modulus on osteoblast differentiation and mineralization revealed by combinatorial screening.Biomaterials2010311950515062Google Scholar
116.HillMCNguyenMKJeonOAlsbergESpatial control of cell gene expression by siRNA gradients in biodegradable hydrogels.Adv Healthc Mater201545714722Google Scholar
117.LarsenEKULarsenNBAlmdalKLarsenEKULarsenNBAlmdalKMultimaterial hydrogel with widely tunable elasticity by selective photopolymerization of PEG diacrylate and epoxy monomers.J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys2016(April):1195-1201.Google Scholar
118.HeJQinTLiuYLiXLiDJinZElectrospinning of nanofibrous scaffolds with continuous structure and material gradients.Mater Lett2014137393397Google Scholar
119.LipnerJLiuWLiuYet al.The mechanics of PLGA nanofiber scaffolds with biomimetic gradients in mineral for tendon-to-bone repair.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2014405968Google Scholar
120.TzezanaRReznikSBlumenthalJZussmanELevenbergSRegulation of stem cell differentiation by control of retinoic acid gradients in hydrospun 3D scaffold.Macromol Biosci2012125598607Google Scholar
121.ZouBLiuYLuoXChenFGuoXLiXElectrospun fibrous scaffolds with continuous gradations in mineral contents and biological cues for manipulating cellular behaviors.Acta Biomater20128415761585Google Scholar
122.EriskenCKalyonDMWangHFunctionally graded electrospun polycaprolactone and beta-tricalcium phosphate nanocomposites for tissue engineering applications.Biomaterials2008293040654073Google Scholar
Department of Civil, Environmental, Aerospace, Materials Engineering, RU INSTM, University of Palermo, Palermo - Italy
Article usage statistics
The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.
No supplementary material is available for this article.