Functionalized biomimetic calcium phosphates for bone tissue repair
Abstract
The design and development of novel materials for biomineralized tissues is an extremely attractive field of research where calcium phosphates (CaPs)–based materials for biomedical applications play a leading role. The biological performance of these compounds can be enhanced through functionalization with biologically active ions and molecules. This review reports on some important recent achievements in creating functionalized biomimetic CaP materials for applications in the musculoskeletal field. Particular attention is focused on the modifications of these inorganic compounds with bioactive ions, growth factors and drugs, as well as on recent trends in some important CaP applications as biomaterials – namely, as bone cements, coatings of metallic implants and scaffolds for regenerative medicine.
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2017; 15(4): e313 - e325
Article Type: REVIEW
DOI:10.5301/jabfm.5000367
Authors
Adriana Bigi, Elisa Boanini
Article History
• Accepted on 11/05/2017
• Available online on 29/05/2017
• Published online on 10/11/2017
Disclosures
Financial support: This research was carried out with the financial support of the University of Bologna (FARB 2012).
Conflict of Interest: Both authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
Biomimetics mimics the strategies utilized by living organisms to fabricate biological materials for the development of new functional materials (1). In practice, biomineralized tissues often exhibit peculiar morphologies, structures and mechanical behavior, and provide useful models for the design of complex functional materials (2-3-4). Moreover, biogenic minerals are generally produced using low-cost, easily available raw materials, in mild conditions of temperature, pressure and pH. Thus, it is not surprising that biomimetics has developed and spread into many scientific areas – in particular, in the field of new biomaterials aimed to repair the skeletal system (5-6-7-8).
The success of a biomaterial for bone substitution requires the ability of the synthetic material to bond to the surrounding biological tissue (9). To this aim, similarity between the synthetic and the biological material, in composition, as well as in structure, morphology and functionality, plays a key role (10). Bone is a highly organized tissue assembled from nano to macro scales to give hierarchical networks (8, 11). During bone mineralization, the inorganic crystals are laid down on an organic matrix rich in collagen fibrils. Collagen is synthesized, secreted by the cell and then self-assembled in the extracellular space, where it acts as a scaffold for the mineral deposition. The organic matrix also contains acidic macromolecules, rich in negatively charged groups, which exert a further control on the modality of deposition, including nucleation, polymorphism, growth, orientation, shape and dimensions of the crystals (11-12-13). The mineral phase consists of a basic calcium phosphate (CaP), similar to synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA), Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2. Once mineralized, collagen fibrils are used to build up complex hierarchically assembled structures (14), which are designed to fulfill a wide variety of mechanical functions (15-16-17-18). A further peculiarity of bone tissue is its continuous remodeling, which is achieved through the resorptive activity of osteoclasts and the synthetic activity of osteoblasts (19, 20).
In spite of the complexity of the events involved in bone synthesis, which include hierarchical structuring, adaptive growth and constant remodeling, significant advances in understanding the biomineralization process have been made (16, 19, 21, 22). Nonetheless, the reproduction of the whole biomineral assembly mechanism by nonbiological methods cannot be regarded as an affordable goal. A more realistic approach is to develop bioinspired processes for obtaining tailored functions using cheap base materials.
Synthetic HA is the most widely utilized CaP for hard tissue applications due to its excellent biocompatibility and bioactivity, as well as its similarity with biological apatites. However, at variance with HA, bone apatite is poorly crystalline, consists of smaller crystals and contains a number of foreign ions, which account for its nonstoichiometry. On this basis, nanocrystalline biomimetic apatite, and further CaPs more resorbable than HA, such as dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (DCDP), octacalcium phosphate (OCP) and α- and β-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP; β-TCP), most of which can easily hydrolyze into apatite, are gaining increasing attention (23-24-25-26). Some characteristic morphologies of CaPs are shown in Figure 1. Bone response to synthetic CaPs can be improved through modifications with biologically active ions and molecules. This paper reviews some relevant recent results achieved in the field of functionalized biomimetic CaP materials for bone tissue replacement and repair.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of hydroxyapatite crystals (A); scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of octacalcium phosphate (B) and β-tricalcium phosphate (C) crystals.
Functionalized CaP crystals
Due to the many different ions found in the biological environment in close association with the mineral phase of calcified tissues, a great deal of attention has been given to ionic substitutions, especially in the structure of HA but also of other CaPs (23, 27, 28). Relevant biological ions include both bivalent, such as Sr2+, Mg2+ and Mn2+, and monovalent, such as Na+ and K+, cations, as well as anions, with CO32− and F- occupying a predominant role (Fig. 2) (29). Ionic substitutions, even to a limited extent, can greatly modify the physicochemical properties and bioactive behavior of CaPs. In particular, the amount of Si that can be incorporated into the HA structure is quite limited (0.1%-5%) (30), although this can be enough to provoke important improvements of the bioactivity of HA (31, 32). Silicon incorporation into the HA structure involves charge compensation, because of the replacement of a PO43- with a SiO44-, and provokes the creation of crystalline defects. Recently, it has been shown than nanocrystalline SiHA delays early osteoclast-like cell differentiation and decreases the resorptive activity of those cells (33).
Perspective view along the c-axis of the OH channel environment of hydroxyapatite. Some of the possible substituting ions are reported. The 2 triangles join Ca(II) ions at the same level along the c-axis.
Strontium-enriched CaPs have recently been the object of increasing interest due to the success of strontium, administered as strontium ranelate, in the treatment of patients affected by osteoporosis (34, 35). Sr can replace Ca in the HA structure in the whole range of compositions (36). Sr substitution for Ca influences HA solubility, which increases with increasing Sr content (37, 38), thus affecting ionic release and finally biological response. In vitro studies carried out using normal and osteopenic osteoblasts and osteoclasts have suggested that SrHA promotes bone growth and inhibits excessive bone resorption in a dose-dependent manner (39, 40).
Although the structure of OCP is less favorable for ionic substitution than that of HA, Sr can replace Ca in the monoclinic lattice of this CaP up to 7.4 at% (41). At variance with Sr, which has an ionic radius greater than that of Ca, smaller ions, such as Mg2+, Mn2+, Zn2+ and Co2+, usually destabilize HA, as well as OCP, and they prefer structures with available octahedral coordination sites, such as β-TCP (42-43-44).
Magnesium plays a key role in bone metabolism, and its reduction has been associated with decreased osteoblast activity, with consequent increase of fragility and loss of bone mass (45). The presence of Mg induces a decrease of crystallinity of HA (46-47-48), which may be coupled to increased surface hydration (49) and yields increased solubility and reduced thermal stability (50, 51).
As in the case of Mg2+, the HA structure does not sustain the incorporation of relatively high amounts of Zn2+ (29, 48). The presence of Zn in HA, as well as in β-TCP, inhibits in vitro osteoclast development and activity (52, 53).
Antiosteoclastic properties have been reported also for gallium (54), which has recently raised significant interest in view of the possibility of its being associated with CaPs to give antiresorptive materials (55).
Biomimetic strategies also involve functionalization of CaPs with organic molecules or macromolecules, as synthetic analogues of the acidic macromolecules present in biomineralized tissues, with the purpose of modulating CaP nucleation, growth, crystal structure, crystallinity and solubility. In particular, the interaction of CaPs with a variety of amino and polyamino acids has been investigated, to help clarify the mineralization process and to obtain materials able to provide an improved interfacial bonding with bone tissue (56-57-58-59-60).
The use of CaPs as potential delivery systems for osteogenic agents, such as growth factors and hormones, or other specific drugs, represents an even more difficult and attractive challenge. The continuously increased aging of the population in developed countries is the main cause of the observed serious increase in age-related musculoskeletal disorders, most of which are related to loss of bone mass, in conditions such as osteoporosis (61). CaPs functionalized with antiresorptive, antibacterial, antiinflammatory agents are promising systems to answer the increasing demand for materials for the repair and substitution of damaged tissues.
Bisphosphonates (BPs) are the most popular antiresorptive drugs, utilized for treatment of metabolic diseases, such as osteoporosis and Paget’s disease, and for the prevention and treatment of bone metastases (62, 63). BP-functionalized CaPs can be prepared through chemisorption from solution, as well through coprecipitation (64-65-66-67-68-69-70). In vitro results generally indicate that BPs maintain their inhibiting effect on osteoclastogenesis and on osteoclast activity even if incorporated into CaPs (66, 67, 71-72-73). Both alendronate and zoledronate, two powerful amino BPs, can be incorporated into HA up to a maximum amount of about 7 wt%, through coprecipitation. In both cases, functionalization causes a reduction of the crystal dimensions, as shown in Figure 3 for zoledronate. The results of in vitro tests revealed a greater effect of zoledronate on osteoclast (67). Zoledronate-HA displays a better inhibitory action toward osteoclasts also compared with SrHA, which has a better stimulating action on osteoblasts. These results support the hypothesis that the cumulative effect of the two functionalized agents would be the optimal solution for therapeutic purposes (70). A recent in vivo study showed that zoledronate-HA nanocrystals injected intravenously into a rat model of postmenopausal osteoporosis displayed a greater effectiveness in promoting bone formation compared with pure zoledronate (74).
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals with different zoledronate contents: 0 wt% (A), 4.0 wt% (B) and 7.4 wt% (C). Scale bars = 100 nm. Reproduced with permission from ref. (67). Copyright 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
Loading CaPs with bone morphogenetic protein (BMP-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was investigated with the aim of developing new materials with improved osteogenetic and angiogenetic properties, respectively (75, 76).
In addition, CaPs have been proposed as delivery systems for anticancer drugs, including cisplatin and doxorubicin (77, 78), and antibiotics, including gentamicin, vancomycin and β-lactams (72, 79).
Bone cements
CaP bone cements (CPCs) can be used to completely fill bone defects or cavities, as well as be molded in customized shapes (80, 81). The cementitious process implies the reaction between one or several CaPs and a liquid phase, which produces a workable paste that stiffens during the reaction, yielding in situ formation of a solid CaP (82). The reaction does not provoke an inflammatory response, since it is not exothermic, which represents a relevant advantage compared with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), the most widely employed material for implant fixation. Moreover, CPCs display excellent biocompatibility and are able to activate osteogenesis.
The first CPC consisted of tetracalcium phosphate (TTCP; Ca4(PO4)2O) and dicalcium phosphate anhydrous (DCPA; CaHPO4) (83), and it received the approval of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of non-load-bearing bone defects in 1996 (84). Since this first formulation, a lot of compositions have been tested, and a number of studies have been performed on the effects of several parameters, such as dimensions of cement powder, composition of the liquid phase and powder to liquid ratio, on the properties of the cements (82, 85, 86).
The possible final products for CPC hardening reactions can be brushite (CaHPO4·2H2O; DCPD), which, however, is a metastable phase and easily transforms into apatite, either as stoichiometric HA or as calcium-deficient HA (Ca9(HPO4)(PO4)5OH; CDHA). Both cement types involve the dissolution of a less stable CaP phase to form a more stable one (87). At 37°C, brushite is the thermodynamically more stable phase at pH <4.2, whereas HA is the most stable at higher pH values. Brushite CPCs display shorter setting times than apatite CPCs, a fact that has been ascribed to the higher solubility of cement raw materials and to the faster crystal growth of DCPD (88).
Many CPC formulations involve the hydrolysis of α-TCP powder. The apatite obtained from the hardening reaction in an aqueous environment at 37°C is similar to bone apatite (89). The characteristic parameters able to promote fast kinetics and reduce the setting time of CPCs include small particle size, poor crystallinity, high setting temperature, low liquid to powder ratio (L/P ratio), as well as the presence of accelerating agents in the liquid or in the solid phase. Setting times must be long enough to allow workability during surgery, and fast enough to avoid delaying the operation. Efforts have been addressed to developing CPCs that mimic more closely the characteristic of hard tissues, and that enhance resorption and promote osteogenesis. To this aim, biomimetic strategies suggest the introduction of biopolymers, such as collagen and gelatin, in the cement composition (89-90-91-92). In particular, the addition of gelatin was found to accelerate cement hardening, improve mechanical properties, stimulate osteoblast proliferation and enhance the levels of osteoblast differentiation markers (87, 92, 93). As an exemplum, the compressive strength of an α-TCP-based cement enriched with gelatin was found to be 4 times that of the control cement (89).
CPCs are intrinsically microporous. Microporosity, which increases with increasing liquid to powder ratio (94), is essential for impregnation of biological fluids. On the other hand, the presence of interconnected macropores promotes bone ingrowth (95). Macroporosity can be created through porogen leaching and gas foaming (96). Recently, a new method based on mixing the cement CaP powder with a previously foamed surfactant-containing liquid has been proposed (97).
The presence of macro pores increases permeability and, as a consequence, degradation, but it also significantly worsens the mechanical performance of the cement. Poor mechanical properties is a minor issue in low- or non-load-bearing applications, whereas CPCs use in load-bearing applications requires a strength similar to or greater than that of the bone tissue being replaced (98). Solid phase additives, such as HA and DCPD, as well as the addition of accelerators and retardants to the liquid phase, have been proposed to increase cement strength (80, 86, 99-100-101). Increase of DCPD content up to 5 wt% in the composition of an α-TCP-gelatin cement was found to enhance the values of compressive strength and Young modulus from 16 to 35 MPa and from 480 to 1,600 MPa, respectively (86).
A further strategy for reinforcement involves the addition of fibers to the cement matrix: both resorbable and nonresorbable fibers have been tested to this aim, and the influence of several parameters, such as fiber length, amount and orientation, on cement properties has been investigated (90, 102-103-104-105). Enrichment of an α-TCP-based cement with electrospun fibers of poly(L-lactic acid) and poly(lactide-co-glycolide) was found to slow down the conversion of α-TCP to calcium-deficient HA, with a consequent reduction of crystal dimensions and crystallinity of the apatitic phase, which yielded fiber-reinforced cements able to maintain their mechanical properties in the long term (Fig. 4) (106). Incorporation of electrospun poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) into a CPC consisting of TTCP, DCPA and chitosan lactate increased the flexural strength twofold, and toughness by an order of magnitude, compared with the control cement (107).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of an α-TCP cement reinforced with electrospun polymeric fibers: starting powder (A) and after 40 days in physiological solution (B). Reproduced with permission from ref. (106). Copyright 2012 Springer.
CPCs are also widely employed as drug delivery systems (108). Drugs can be combined with the solid or liquid phase, or can be introduced in a particulate carrier added to a cement formulation (61). Li et al (109) verified that CPC containing BMP-2 loaded gelatin microspheres yielded faster healing and greater mineralization of vertebral defects in osteoporotic goats compared with controls where BMP-2 was loaded directly on the cement.
Among the therapeutically important ions which can be utilized to functionalize CPCs, a great deal of attention has been given to Sr2+, due to its antiosteoporotic properties (110). The addition of Sr to the liquid phase was reported to have a modest impact on the mechanical properties of the cement (111), whereas its inclusion in the solid phase as SrCO3 provoked a significant increase of the compressive strength (112). Recently, a cement containing α-TCP, DCPA and HA, as well as SrCO3 as source of Sr, was implanted in a rat femur to fill the gap of a wedge-shaped critical size defect mimicking a typical osteoporotic fracture, leading to an increase in bone formation and enhanced remodeling (113).
CPCs have been successfully functionalized also with BPs (114). BPs have been loaded on the liquid phase or through chemisorptions on one of the components of the cement (115-116-117). Although just small relative amounts of BPs can be loaded into CPCs without provoking excessive lengthening of setting times, they were shown to be sufficient to stimulate positive in vitro and in vivo responses (14-15-16-17). In particular, in a recent study, an injectable CPC loaded with alendronate was implanted in osteopenic bone defects in the vertebrae of adult female sheep, showing a positive influence on the microarchitecture of the adjacent trabecular bone (118).
Coatings
Implants at high-load-bearing sites, such as in the case of hip and femur replacement devices, must have suitable mechanical properties and be resistant to wear and corrosion (119). Several metals, including titanium (Ti), Ti alloys and cobalt alloys, as well as stainless steels, provide proper mechanical performance, which is also associated to a high strength to weight ratio in the case of Ti and its alloys. However, bone implant failures, which are mainly ascribed to aseptic loosening or infection, occur frequently (120). CaP coating of the implants provides them with a highly bioactive interface for surrounding bone tissue.
Besides biomimetic deposition, the coating can be realized utilizing one of numerous physical and chemical methods, which include plasma spray (121, 122), pulsed laser deposition (123, 124), matrix-assisted pulsed laser evaporation (125-126-127), sputtering (128), electrodeposition (129) and sol-gel dipping (130).
Wet chemical techniques offer the best solutions when incorporation of organic or biological components is desired. Moreover, biomimetic methods offer further advantages, such as better control of the crystal structure, morphology and thickness (119). The biomimetic approach is based on deposition of a CaP thin layer from supersaturated solutions in mild conditions similar to those of biomineralization processes. As a consequence, it is a relatively easy and low-cost method, and allows coating of complex-shaped and porous materials (131, 132). Moreover, the composition of the supersaturated solution can be enriched with ions and biological molecules, as well as drugs, which are deposited together with the inorganic layer (133-134-135).
An interesting functionalization of biomimetic HA coatings on Ti alloys was developed by loading BPs. To this aim, different methods of loading BPs into CaP coatings have been proposed. The results of a comparative study indicated the coprecipitation method to be the best one to control the release profile of alendronate, which is incorporated in the inner layers of the coatings (136). Furthermore, BPs and antibiotics were incorporated simultaneously into the same coating, with the aim to provide a local release of the two different drugs. The results indicated that the presence of the BP, which was found to bind to the coating surface, does not affect the sustained release of antibiotics, which was suggested to provide improved stability of the implant and reduced risk of associated infections (137). Ti coatings of BP-containing CaPs have been obtained also using matrix-assisted pulsed laser evaporation which, in contrast to other physical techniques, allows the transferring of organic or biological materials (125, 127, 138). In vitro tests on HA coatings with increasing alendronate content showed a significant decrease of osteoclast proliferation and decrease of caspase-3. The analysis of phalloidin staining performed after 14 days of osteoclast culture confirmed the significant reduction of the cell number on the alendronate-containing coatings, as can be seen in Figure 5 (138).
Phalloidin staining of osteoclast cultures after 24 hours from seeding on bare Ti (A) and hydroxyapatite coatings with different alendronate contents (B-D) (0, 3.9 and 7.1 wt%, respectively). Scale bars = 20 µm. Reproduced with permission from ref. (138). Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd.
Biomimetic CaP coatings have also been used as BMP delivery systems in successful spinal arthrodesis. The system provides a sustained, localized release of BMP into the fusion site (139).
The first proposed CaP supersaturated solution was the simulated body fluid (SBF) solution proposed by Kokubo et al (140), which had an ionic composition similar to that of human plasma. Since then, many studies have been performed with the aim of accelerating the deposition of a homogeneous CaP layer (141-142-143-144). Chemical or physical modification of the metal surface can accelerate deposition and promote adhesion of the coating. A multistep alkali treatment followed by heat treatment is the most common procedure to induce the formation of sodium titanate on a Ti surface, which results in the formation of a chemical bond between substrate and coating (145). The topography of the metallic surface is also very important and can be modified in a controlled way with different methods (141), including simple physical or chemical etching of the surface. Acid etching is very widely used because it is the standard surface-cleaning procedure for Ti substrates, and at the same time, it is able to generate rough surfaces. Lu et al (142) demonstrated that nitric acid treatment significantly increases Ti surface energy, and favors the CaP heterogeneous nucleation process on the metallic surfaces through the reduction of the net interfacial energy.
Recently, coating of Ti-based implants with an anodic TiO2 nanotube layer has been proposed to enhance the formation of apatite (146). Furthermore, thanks to their tubular nature, these coatings are good candidates for the “alternative immersion method,” which is based on preloading the coatings with synthetic HA. This method results in a significant promotion of apatite formation, and the resulting coatings may exhibit improved osteoconductivity while retaining a strong bond with the Ti metal substrate (146).
Variations in composition of the calcifying solution can be used to modify the chemical, structural and morphological characteristics of the coatings, as well as to accelerate the deposition process (147). A highly effective method to obtain a fast biomimetic deposition of nanocrystalline HA onto metallic substrates has been developed, using a slightly supersaturated CaP solution, with a simplified ionic composition compared with that of SBF. The simplified CaP solution (2.5 mM Ca2+, 25.5 mM Na+, 2.5 mM PO43-, 5.0 mM Cl- and 18 mM HCO3-) yields the deposition of a uniform CaP coating on Ti alloy substrates in a few hours (130, 148). In contrast to other fast deposition solutions, which generally lead to deposition of an amorphous material, the coating obtained with the new formulation consists of nanocrystalline apatite. Cylindrical samples for in vivo tests (Fig. 6) display a homogeneous coating after 6 hours of exposure to the calcifying solution using specially designed supports. The results of implantation in rabbit cortical bone defects demonstrated that the presence of nanocrystalline apatite accelerated bone ingrowth around the implant (131).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of the homogeneous coating obtained on Ti13Nb11Zr cylindrical specimens after just 6 hours of exposure to the slightly supersaturated Ca/P solution. The coating consists of nanocrystalline apatite. Reproduced with permission from ref. (131). Copyright 2008 Elsevier Ltd.
Recently, an interesting study presented enzymatic decomposition of urea as a means to increase the pH of the calcifying solution during deposition. It was found that urease, as well as calcium and phosphate concentration, is a major factor in controlling nucleation and morphology of the coating, resulting in flake-like CaP crystals and nano-sized crystals (149).
Scaffolds
The advancement of regenerative medicine requires new complex materials with 3D porous structures, able to host living cells. Ideal scaffolds should be biodegradable and porous, with interconnected porosity to allow cell colonization, revascularization and a suitable supply of nutrients and oxygen (10). In other words, the scaffold must mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM) to promote cell attachment, proliferation, differentiation and normal bone growth during scaffold degradation (150). The ideal biomaterial must further exhibit suitable mechanical and degradation properties.
While many synthetic polymers have been proposed as components of 3D scaffolds for bone repair (151, 152), a biomimetic scaffold should be close to the biological tissue also in terms of composition. CaPs offer a suitable interface, and have the advantage of unlimited availability (10). However, the excellent biocompatibility and osteoconductivity of CaPs are not matched by adequate mechanical properties. The mechanical performance of CaP scaffolding materials can be improved by addition of natural biological components – in particular, protein materials, such as collagen or fibrin, and polysaccharidic materials, such as glycosaminoglycans, chitosan and alginates (153, 154).
Porous scaffolds of gelatin with different inorganic phase (HA) contents were prepared using an optimized method based on foaming and freeze-drying (Fig. 7) (155). Micro-computed tomography reconstructed images indicated that the properties of the scaffolds can be tailored by varying the amount of inorganic phase from 0 to 50 wt%. In particular, compositions up to 30 wt% HA yield scaffolds characterized by very high interconnectivity and porosity, with a mean pore size in the range 100-300 µm, whereas higher inorganic phase content provoked a reduction of these parameters, as well as a significant increase of the compressive modulus and collapse strength. Three-dimensional scaffolds with graded composition were also developed to mimic the different zones of the osteochondral region. The scaffolds were obtained assembling layers containing different amounts of polymers and HA nanocrystals (156, 157).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of gelatin-HA 3D porous scaffolds with different HA contents: 0 wt% (A), 30 wt% (B) and 50 wt% (C). The higher magnification image of (C) shows the microporous structure of the cell walls (D). Reproduced with permission from ref. (155). Copyright 2013 Wiley.
A supercritical CO2 foaming method has recently been applied for preparing porous scaffolds by adding HA nanoparticles as filler to the polymeric matrix of polycaprolactone blends with different molecular weights (158). Foams with different structural and mechanical properties were obtained using polycaprolactone samples of different molecular weights and by varying the pressure or filler amount. Increasing the pressure provoked a decrease in pore size, even if porosity was increased. Adding apatitic nanoparticles to polymeric blends reinforced the mechanical properties, but reduced porosity and also pore size. Moreover, the molecular weight of polycaprolactone had an appreciable influence on the morphology of the scaffolds.
In an attempt to imitate the complex hierarchical structure of bone, as well as its composition, many studies have recently focused on the addition of CaP ceramics in fibrous composites formed using the electrospinning technique (159, 160). Thomas et al fabricated nanofibrous scaffolds containing up to 20% of inorganic phase through co-electrospinning of biocomposite fibers of collagen type I and nano HA (161). The nanocomposite fibrous matrices displayed improved mechanical properties and increased surface roughness with the increase in nano HA content. Since then, the electrospinning method has been improved to obtain electrospun polymeric nanofibers containing well-dispersed inorganic nanoparticles. A recent method encompasses the use of a special triaxial needle: mixing calcium and phosphate aqueous solutions in an intermediate needle yields CaP nanoparticles that immediately after precipitation are dragged by the outer polymeric solution and incorporated directly in the electrospinning jet, before nanofiber formation. Gelatin electrospun mats can contain different amounts of nanoparticles well dispersed throughout the fiber length (162).
To produce custom-made bone substitutes, a promising strategy is a rapid-prototyping technique through which complex physical models can be fabricated starting from 3D clinical images. Several processes and types of equipment are nowadays available to produce such complex 3D shapes, the main one being the additive fabrication method, usually based on a layer-by-layer construction (163). Three-dimensional printing has been revealed to be a cheaper technique compared with manufacturing individual prototypes by subtractive processes. The possibility of using a low-cost 3D printer to produce a bone substitute in a polylactic acid/nano-HA composite material has recently been explored (164). The proposed technology ensured a high degree of repeatability in terms of quality and properties of the polymer composite filament and in terms of the 3D-printed final parts. The material processing allowed a good dispersion of the filler in the matrix, and the composite material was successfully printed, showing a combination of good mechanical properties and ease of creation.
A different approach, which exploits the CPC chemistry, has been proposed to synthesize scaffolds with tailored architectures at room temperature using 3D printing (163). The setting reaction of the CaP cement, such as that between α/β-TCP powder and phosphoric acid which yields brushite, causes hardening of the samples during printing, which results in complex 3D structures with a dimensional accuracy of ± 200 µm (165, 166).
Deville et al (167) proposed a HA porous scaffold with a layered arrangement that resembles nacre. These authors used freezing as a tool to develop a variety of complex porous and layered hybrid materials (168). In particular, directional freezing of an aqueous HA suspension, followed by ice sublimation and sintering, results in a multilayered structure characterized by well-defined pore connectivity, as well as open and unidirectional porosity. This approach has recently been implemented in the development of a bidirectional freeze-casting technique to fabricate large-scale lamellar structures (169). The two different temperature gradients provide a graded nucleation and propagation of ice crystals, which gives rise to the assembling of HA particles into aligned lamellar structures. The resulting porous scaffolds exhibit a nacre-like structure with a long-range order at the centimeter scale.
Scaffolds can be functionalized through loading of active substances on their surface or within the bulk structure (61, 170). In particular, BPs have been loaded on CaP based scaffolds through adsorption from solution, within the bulk structure as scaffold components, and through decoration of liposomes which were then incorporated into the scaffolds (171-172-173) (Fig. 8). Bone regeneration was also reported to be effectively enhanced when scaffolds were functionalized with growth factors or their encoding genes (174).
Surface morphology of polycaprolactone-coated 3D-printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds. This scaffold was engineered for adsorption of bisphosphonate and controlled drug release applications (171). Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society (available under the terms of the ACS AuthorChoice license: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/am501048n).
Even better results can be achieved through multifunctionalization, which is aimed at providing local delivery of active agents to promote a variety of functions, including integration, osteoconduction and angiogenesis (175). Vancomycin-loaded gelatin and Si-doped HA 3D porous scaffolds fabricated by rapid prototyping were recently shown to severely inhibit bacterial growth around the implant (176). Sun et al (177) investigated cell responses to growth factors released from a 3D biodegradable porous CaP scaffold and found that angiogenesis and osteogenesis were promoted by a combination of a gradient of 3 different growth factors released from the multilayered scaffold, more readily than by single growth factors. Moreover, a study of codelivering anabolic and anticatabolic agents – namely, BMP-2 and zoledronate – using a biomimetic collagen-HA scaffold, confirmed the ability of the BP to enhance bone formation promoted by the growth factor (178).
Concluding remarks
Innovative approaches based on biomimetic strategies lead to significant improvements in the performance of CaP biomaterials for hard tissue repair. Further exciting progress has been achieved thanks to the relevant and continuously increasing amount of research on CaPs functionalized with ions, molecules, macromolecules, drugs and growth factors. Modified CaPs can be utilized as-prepared or as raw materials for the preparation of bone cements and coatings, as well as scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Moreover, CaP-based biomaterials are gaining increasing relevance as potential delivery systems for local administration of therapeutic agents.
Disclosures
Financial support: This research was carried out with the financial support of the University of Bologna (FARB 2012).
Conflict of Interest: Both authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.
References
1.VincentJFBogatyrevaOABogatyrevNRBowyerAPahlAKBiomimetics: its practice and theory.J R Soc Interface200639471482Google Scholar
2.HardingJHDuffyDMThe challenge of biominerals to simulations.J Mater Chem2006161211051112Google Scholar
3.MannSBiomineralization: principles and concepts in bioinorganic materials chemistry.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press2001Google Scholar
4.ZhangCMcadamsDAIIGrunlanJCNano/micro-manufacturing of bioinspired materials: a review of methods to mimic natural structures.Adv Mater2016283062926321Google Scholar
5.XuAWMaYColfenHBiomimetic mineralization.J Mater Chem2007175415449Google Scholar
6.BarrèreFMahmoodTAde GrootKvan BlitterswijkCAAdvanced biomaterials for skeletal tissue regeneration: instructive and smart functions.Mater Sci Eng Rep2008591-63871Google Scholar
7.NudelmanFSommerdijkNABiomineralization as an inspiration for materials chemistry.Angew Chem Int Ed Engl2012512765826596Google Scholar
10.CanceddaRGiannoniPMastrogiacomoMA tissue engineering approach to bone repair in large animal models and in clinical practice.Biomaterials2007282942404250Google Scholar
11.LowenstamHAWeinerSOn biomineralization,Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press1989.Google Scholar
12.FujisawaRTamuraMAcidic bone matrix proteins and their roles in calcification.Front Biosci (Landmark Ed)201217118911903Google Scholar
13.FarbodKNejadnikMRJansenJALeeuwenburghSCInteractions between inorganic and organic phases in bone tissue as a source of inspiration for design of novel nanocomposites.Tissue Eng Part B Rev2014202173188Google Scholar
14.ReznikovNShaharRWeinerSBone hierarchical structure in three dimensions.Acta Biomater201410938153826Google Scholar
15.AscenziMGAscenziABenvenutiABurghammerMPanzavoltaSBigiAStructural differences between dark and bright isolated human osteonic lamellae.J Struct Biol200314112233Google Scholar
16.CuiFZLiYGeJSelf-assembly of mineralized collagen composites.Mater Sci Eng Rep2007571-6127Google Scholar
17.CurreyJDThe structure and mechanics of bone.J Mater Sci20124714154Google Scholar
18.ZimmermannEARitchieROBone as a structural material.Adv Healthc Mater20154912871304Google Scholar
19.DaviesJEBone bonding at natural and biomaterial surfaces.Biomaterials2007283450585067Google Scholar
20.RaggattLJPartridgeNCCellular and molecular mechanisms of bone remodeling.J Biol Chem2010285332510325108Google Scholar
21.FratzlPBiomimetic materials research: what can we really learn from nature’s structural materials?J R Soc Interface2007415637642Google Scholar
22.XuZYangYZhaoWet al.Molecular mechanisms for intrafibrillar collagen mineralization in skeletal tissues.Biomaterials2015395966Google Scholar
23.BoaniniEGazzanoMBigiAIonic substitutions in calcium phosphates synthesized at low temperature.Acta Biomater20106618821894Google Scholar
24.BoseSTarafderSCalcium phosphate ceramic systems in growth factor and drug delivery for bone tissue engineering: a review.Acta Biomater20128414011421Google Scholar
25.SuzukiOOctacalcium phosphate: osteoconductivity and crystal chemistry.Acta Biomater20106933793387Google Scholar
27.HabibovicPBarraletJEBioinorganics and biomaterials: bone repair.Acta Biomater20117830133026Google Scholar
28.ShepherdJHShepherdDVBestSMSubstituted hydroxyapatites for bone repair.J Mater Sci Mater Med2012231023352347Google Scholar
29.BigiABoaniniEGazzanoMIon substitution in biological and synthetic apatites. In: Aparicio C, Ginebra MP, eds. Biomineralization and biomaterials: fundamentals and applications.1st edSawston, UK:Woodhead2015:235-266.Google Scholar
30.MarchatDZymelkaMCoelhoCet al.Accurate characterization of pure silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite powders synthesized by a new precipitation route.Acta Biomater20139669927004Google Scholar
31.PatelNBestSMBonfieldWet al.A comparative study on the in vivo behavior of hydroxyapatite and silicon substituted hydroxyapatite granules.J Mater Sci Mater Med2002131211991206Google Scholar
32.KhanAFSaleemMAfzalAAliAKhanAKhanARBioactive behavior of silicon substituted calcium phosphate based bioceramics for bone regeneration.Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl201435245252Google Scholar
33.CasarrubiosLMatesanzMCSánchez-SalcedoSArcosDVallet-RegíMPortolésMTNanocrystallinity effects on osteoblast and osteoclast response to silicon substituted hydroxyapatite.J Colloid Interface Sci2016482112120Google Scholar
34.AmmannPStrontium ranelate: a novel mode of action leading to renewed bone quality.Osteoporos Int200516S01Suppl 1S11S15Google Scholar
35.MariePJStrontium ranelate: new insights into its dual mode of action.Bone2007405S5S8Google Scholar
37.PanHBLiZYLamWMet al.Solubility of strontium-substituted apatite by solid titration.Acta Biomater20095516781685Google Scholar
38.NiGXShuBHuangGLuWWPanHBThe effect of strontium incorporation into hydroxyapatites on their physical and biological properties.J Biomed Mater Res2012100B562568Google Scholar
39.CapucciniCTorricelliPBoaniniEGazzanoMGiardinoRBigiAInteraction of Sr-doped hydroxyapatite nanocrystals with osteoclast and osteoblast-like cells.J Biomed Mater Res200989A3594600Google Scholar
40.BoaniniETorricelliPFiniMBigiAOsteopenic bone cell response to strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite.J Mater Sci Mater Med201122920792088Google Scholar
41.BoaniniEGazzanoMRubiniKBigiACollapsed octacalcium phosphate stabilized by ionic substitutions.Cryst Growth Des201010836123617Google Scholar
42.MatsunagaKKubotaTToyouraKNakamuraAFirst-principles calculations of divalent substitution of Ca(2+) in tricalcium phosphates.Acta Biomater201523329337Google Scholar
43.FrasnelliMSglavoVMEffect of Mg(2+) doping on beta-alpha phase transition in tricalcium phosphate (TCP) bioceramics.Acta Biomater201633283289Google Scholar
44.ZhangMWuCLiHYuenJChangJXiaoYPreparation, characterization and in vitro angiogenic capacity of cobalt substituted β-tricalcium phosphate ceramics.J Mater Chem201222402168621694Google Scholar
45.RudeRKGruberHEMagnesium deficiency and osteoporosis: animal and human observations.J Nutr Biochem20041512710716Google Scholar
46.LaurencinDAlmora-BarriosNde LeeuwNHet al.Magnesium incorporation into hydroxyapatite.Biomaterials201132718261837Google Scholar
47.Diallo-GarciaSLaurencinDKrafftJMet al.Influence of magnesium substitution on the basic properties of hydroxyapatites.J Phys Chem C2011115492431724327Google Scholar
48.RenFLengYXinRGeXSynthesis, characterization and ab initio simulation of magnesium-substituted hydroxyapatite.Acta Biomater20106727872796Google Scholar
49.BertinettiLDrouetCCombesCet al.Surface characteristics of nanocrystalline apatites: effect of mg surface enrichment on morphology, surface hydration species, and cationic environments.Langmuir2009251056475654Google Scholar
50.BigiAFaliniGForestiEGazzanoMRipamontiARoveriNMagnesium influence on hydroxyapatite crystallization.J Inorg Biochem19934916978Google Scholar
51.LiuQChenZPanHDarvellBWMatinlinnaJPEffect of magnesium on the solubility of hydroxyapatite.Eur J Inorg Chem201620163656235629Google Scholar
52.ShepherdDVKauppinenKBrooksRABestSMAn in vitro study into the effect of zinc substituted hydroxyapatite on osteoclast number and activity.J Biomed Mater Res A20141021141364141Google Scholar
53.YamadaYItoAKojimaHet al.Inhibitory effect of Zn2+ in zinc-containing beta-tricalcium phosphate on resorbing activity of mature osteoclasts.J Biomed Mater Res200884A2344352Google Scholar
54.VerronELoubatACarleGFet al.Molecular effects of gallium on osteoclastic differentiation of mouse and human monocytes.Biochem Pharmacol2012835671679Google Scholar
55.VerronEBoulerJMGuicheuxJControlling the biological function of calcium phosphate bone substitutes with drugs.Acta Biomater201281035413551Google Scholar
56.BigiABoaniniEGazzanoMKojdeckiMARubiniKMicrostructural investigation of hydroxyapatite-polyelectrolyte composites.J Mater Chem2004142274279Google Scholar
57.BoaniniETorricelliPGazzanoMGiardinoRBigiANanocomposites of hydroxyapatite with aspartic acid and glutamic acid and their interaction with osteoblast-like cells.Biomaterials2006272544284433Google Scholar
58.ChuXJiangWZhangZet al.Unique roles of acidic amino acids in phase transformation of calcium phosphates.J Phys Chem B2011115511511157Google Scholar
59.LeeWHLooCYChrzanowskiWRohanizadehROsteoblast response to the surface of amino acid-functionalized hydroxyapatite.J Biomed Mater Res A2015103621502160Google Scholar
60.TavafoghiMCerrutiMThe role of amino acids in hydroxyapatite mineralization.J R Soc Interface20161312320160462Google Scholar
61.KyllönenLDEsteMAliniMEglinDLocal drug delivery for enhancing fracture healing in osteoporotic bone.Acta Biomater201511412434Google Scholar
62.RussellRGBisphosphonates: the first 40 years.Bone2011491219Google Scholar
63.GigerEVCastagnerBLerouxJCBiomedical applications of bisphosphonates.J Control Release20131672175188Google Scholar
64.JosseSFaucheuxCSoueidanAet al.Novel biomaterials for bisphosphonate delivery.Biomaterials2005261420732080Google Scholar
65.RoussièreHFayonFAlonsoBet al.Reaction of zoledronate with beta-tricalcium phosphate, for the design of potential drug device combined systems.Chem Mater2008201182191Google Scholar
66.BoaniniETorricelliPGazzanoMGiardinoRBigiAAlendronate-hydroxyapatite nanocomposites and their interaction with osteoclasts and osteoblast-like cells.Biomaterials2008297790796Google Scholar
67.BoaniniETorricelliPGazzanoMFiniMBigiAThe effect of zoledronate-hydroxyapatite nanocomposites on osteoclasts and osteoblast-like cells in vitro.Biomaterials2012332722730Google Scholar
68.BoaniniETorricelliPGazzanoMFiniMBigiACrystalline calcium alendronate obtained by octacalcium phosphate digestion: a new chance for local treatment of bone loss diseases?Adv Mater2013253346054611Google Scholar
69.ErrassifiFSardaSBarrougALegrouriASfihiHReyCInfrared, Raman and NMR investigations of risedronate adsorption on nanocrystalline apatites.J Colloid Interface Sci2014420101111Google Scholar
70.BoaniniETorricelliPGazzanoMDella BellaEFiniMBigiACombined effect of strontium and zoledronate on hydroxyapatite structure and bone cell responses.Biomaterials2014352156195626Google Scholar
71.BoaniniETorricelliPGazzanoMFiniMBigiAThe effect of alendronate doped calcium phosphates on bone cells activity.Bone2012515944952Google Scholar
72.KolmasJKrukowskiSLaskusAJurkitewiczMSynthetic hydroxyapatite in pharmaceutical applications.Ceram Int201642224722487Google Scholar
73.ForteLTorricelliPBoaniniEGazzanoMFiniMBigiAAntiresorptive and anti-angiogenetic octacalcium phosphate functionalized with bisphosphonates: an in vitro tri-culture study.Acta Biomater201754419428Google Scholar
74.KhajuriaDKRazdanRMahapatraDRDevelopment, in vitro and in vivo characterization of zoledronic acid functionalized hydroxyapatite nanoparticle based formulation for treatment of osteoporosis in animal model.Eur J Pharm Sci201566173183Google Scholar
75.PolakSJLevengoodSKWheelerMBMakiAJClarkSGJohnsonAJAnalysis of the roles of microporosity and BMP-2 on multiple measures of bone regeneration and healing in calcium phosphate scaffolds.Acta Biomater20117417601771Google Scholar
76.WernikeEMontjoventMOLiuYet al.VEGF incorporated into calcium phosphate ceramics promotes vascularisation and bone formation in vivo.Eur Cell Mater2010193040Google Scholar
77.BarrougAKuhnLTGerstenfeldLCGlimcherMJInteractions of cisplatin with calcium phosphate nanoparticles: in vitro controlled adsorption and release.J Orthop Res2004224703708Google Scholar
78.XiongHDuSNiJZhouJYaoJMitochondria and nuclei dual-targeted heterogeneous hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for enhancing therapeutic efficacy of doxorubicin.Biomaterials2016947083Google Scholar
79.GuoYPLongTTangSGuoYJZhuZAHydrothermal fabrication of magnetic mesoporous carbonated hydroxyapatite microspheres: biocompatibility, osteoinductivity, drug delivery property and bactericidal property.J Mater Chem20142B1928992909Google Scholar
80.BohnerMReactivity of calcium phosphate cements.J Mater Chem2007173839803986Google Scholar
82.ZhangJLiuWSchnitzlerVTancretFBoulerJMCalcium phosphate cements for bone substitution: chemistry, handling and mechanical properties.Acta Biomater201410310351049Google Scholar
83.BrownWEChowLCA new calcium phosphate water-setting cement.In: Brown PW, ed. Cements research progressWesterville, OH:American Ceramic Society1986:352-379.Google Scholar
84.FriedmanCDCostantinoPDTakagiSChowLCBoneSource hydroxyapatite cement: a novel biomaterial for craniofacial skeletal tissue engineering and reconstruction.J Biomed Mater Res199843B428432Google Scholar
85.SugawaraAAsaokaKDingSJCalcium phosphate-based cements: clinical needs and recent progress.J Mater Chem20131B810811089Google Scholar
86.PanzavoltaSBracciBRubiniKBigiAOptimization of a biomimetic bone cement: role of DCPD.J Inorg Biochem2011105810601065Google Scholar
87.ChowLCNext generation calcium phosphate-based biomaterials.Dent Mater J2009281110Google Scholar
88.AlkhraisatMHRuedaCJerezLBet al.Effect of silica gel on the cohesion, properties and biological performance of brushite cement.Acta Biomater201061257265Google Scholar
89.BigiAPanzavoltaSRubiniKSetting mechanism of a biomimetic bone cement.Chem Mater2004161937403745Google Scholar
90.OHaraRMOrrJFBuchananFJWilcoxRKBartonDCDunneNJDevelopment of a bovine collagen-apatitic calcium phosphate cement for potential fracture treatment through vertebroplasty.Acta Biomater201281140434052Google Scholar
91.PerezRAGinebraMPInjectable collagen/α-tricalcium phosphate cement: collagen-mineral phase interactions and cell response.J Mater Sci Mater Med2013242381393Google Scholar
92.TeotiaAKGuptaARainaDBLidgrenLKumarAGelatin-modified bone substitute with bioactive molecules enhance cellular interactions and bone regeneration.ACS Appl Mater Interfaces20168171077510787Google Scholar
94.ZhangJTTancretFBoulerJMFabrication and mechanical properties of calcium phosphate cements (CPC) for bone substitution.Mater Sci Eng C2011314740747Google Scholar
95.MurphyCMHaughMGOBrienFJThe effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Biomaterials2010313461466Google Scholar
96.HabrakenWJWolkeJGJansenJACeramic composites as matrices and scaffolds for drug delivery in tissue engineering.Adv Drug Deliv Rev2007594-5234248Google Scholar
97.PastorinoDCanalCGinebraMPDrug delivery from injectable calcium phosphate foams by tailoring the macroporosity-drug interaction.Acta Biomater201512250259Google Scholar
98.SugawaraAAsaokaKDingS-JCalcium phosphate-based cements: clinical needs and recent progress.J Mater Chem20131B810811089Google Scholar
99.MarinoFTTorresJHamdanMRodriguezCRCabarcosELAdvantages of using glycolic acid as a retardant in a brushite forming cement.J Biomed Mater Res200783B571579Google Scholar
100.HofmannMPMohammedARPerrieYGbureckUBarraletJEHigh-strength resorbable brushite bone cement with controlled drug-releasing capabilities.Acta Biomater2009514349Google Scholar
101.TamimiFSheikhZBarraletJDicalcium phosphate cements: brushite and monetite.Acta Biomater201282474487Google Scholar
102.KrügerRGrollJFiber reinforced calcium phosphate cements on the way to degradable load bearing bone substitutes?Biomaterials2012332558875900Google Scholar
103.NezafatiNMoztarzadehFHesarakiSMozafariMSynergistically reinforcement of a self-setting calcium phosphate cement with bioactive glass fibers.Ceram Int2011373927934Google Scholar
104.ChewKKLowKLSharif ZeinSHet al.Reinforcement of calcium phosphate cement with multi-walled carbon nanotubes and bovine serum albumin for injectable bone substitute applications.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater201143331339Google Scholar
105.ZuoYYangFWolkeJGLiYJansenJAIncorporation of biodegradable electrospun fibers into calcium phosphate cement for bone regeneration.Acta Biomater20106412381247Google Scholar
106.PanzavoltaSBracciBFocareteMLGualandiCBigiAFiber reinforcement of a biomimetic bone cement.J Mater Sci Mater Med201223613631370Google Scholar
107.BaoCChenWWeirMDThein-HanWXuHHEffects of electrospun submicron fibers in calcium phosphate cement scaffold on mechanical properties and osteogenic differentiation of umbilical cord stem cells.Acta Biomater2011740374044Google Scholar
108.GinebraMPCanalCEspanolMPastorinoDMontufarEBCalcium phosphate cements as drug delivery materials.Adv Drug Deliv Rev2012641210901110Google Scholar
109.LiMLiuXLiuXGeBCalcium phosphate cement with BMP-2-loaded gelatin microspheres enhances bone healing in osteoporosis: a pilot study.Clin Orthop Relat Res2010468719781985Google Scholar
110.SchumacherMGelinskyMStrontium modified calcium phosphate cements: approaches towards targeted stimulation of bone turnover.J Mater Chem20153B2346264640Google Scholar
111.PanzavoltaSTorricelliPSturbaLBracciBGiardinoRBigiASetting properties and in vitro bioactivity of strontium-enriched gelatin-calcium phosphate bone cements.J Biomed Mater Res200884A4965972Google Scholar
112.SchumacherMHenßARohnkeMGelinskyMA novel and easy-to-prepare strontium(II) modified calcium phosphate bone cement with enhanced mechanical properties.Acta Biomater20139775367544Google Scholar
113.ThormannURaySSommerUet al.Bone formation induced by strontium modified calcium phosphate cement in critical-size metaphyseal fracture defects in ovariectomized rats.Biomaterials2013343485898598Google Scholar
114.FazilMBabootaSSahniJKAmeeduzzafar Ali J.Bisphosphonates: therapeutics potential and recent advances in drug delivery.Drug Deliv201522119Google Scholar
115.PanzavoltaSTorricelliPBracciBFiniMBigiAAlendronate and Pamidronate calcium phosphate bone cements: setting properties and in vitro response of osteoblast and osteoclast cells.J Inorg Biochem20091031101106Google Scholar
116.VerronEGauthierOJanvierPet al.In vivo bone augmentation in an osteoporotic environment using bisphosphonate-loaded calcium deficient apatite.Biomaterials2010313077767784Google Scholar
117.SchnitzlerVFayonFDespasCet al.Investigation of alendronate-doped apatitic cements as a potential technology for the prevention of osteoporotic hip fractures: critical influence of the drug introduction mode on the in vitro cement properties.Acta Biomater201172759770Google Scholar
118.VerronEPissonnierMLLesoeurJet al.Vertebroplasty using bisphosphonate-loaded calcium phosphate cement in a standardized vertebral body bone defect in an osteoporotic sheep model.Acta Biomater2014101148874895Google Scholar
119.DuanKWangRSurface modifications of bone implants through wet chemistry.J Mater Chem2006162423092321Google Scholar
120.BozicKJKurtzSMLauEet al.The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States.Clin Orthop Relat Res201046814551Google Scholar
121.HasanMFWangJBerndtCEvaluation of the mechanical properties of plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings.Appl Surf Sci2014303155162Google Scholar
122.RahmanZUShabibIHaiderWSurface characterization and cytotoxicity analysis of plasma sprayed coatings on titanium alloys.Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl201667675683Google Scholar
123.CapucciniCTorricelliPSimaFet al.Strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite coatings synthesized by pulsed-laser deposition: in vitro osteoblast and osteoclast response.Acta Biomater20084618851893Google Scholar
124.RauJVCacciottiILauretiSFoscaMVarvaroGLatiniABioactive, nanostructured Si-substituted hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium prepared by pulsed laser deposition.J Biomed Mater Res2015103B16211631Google Scholar
125.BoaniniETorricelliPForteLet al.Antiresorption implant coatings based on calcium alendronate and octacalcium phosphate deposited by matrix assisted pulsed laser evaporation.Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces2015136449456Google Scholar
126.BoaniniETorricelliPFiniMet al.Magnesium and strontium doped octacalcium phosphate thin films by matrix assisted pulsed laser evaporation.J Inorg Biochem201210716572Google Scholar
127.BoaniniETorricelliPSimaFet al.Strontium and zoledronate hydroxyapatites graded composite coatings for bone prostheses.J Colloid Interface Sci201544817Google Scholar
128.VladescuAPadmanabhanSCAk AzemFet al.Mechanical properties and biocompatibility of the sputtered Ti doped hydroxyapatite.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater201663314325Google Scholar
129.HuangYHaoMNianXet al.Strontium and copper co-substituted hydroxyapatite-based coatings with improved antibacterial activity and cytocompatibility fabricated by electrodeposition.Ceram Int201642101187611888Google Scholar
130.SidaneDChicotDYalaSet al.Study of the mechanical behavior and corrosion resistance of hydroxyapatite sol–gel thin coatings on 316 L stainless steel pre-coated with titania film.Thin Solid Films20155937180Google Scholar
131.BigiAFiniMBracciBet al.The response of bone to nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite-coated Ti13Nb11Zr alloy in an animal model.Biomaterials2008291117301736Google Scholar
132.BarrereFvan der ValkCMMeijerGDalmeijerRAde GrootKLayrollePOsteointegration of biomimetic apatite coating applied onto dense and porous metal implants in femurs of goats.J Biomed Mater Res200367B655665Google Scholar
133.BracciBTorricelliPPanzavoltaSBoaniniEGiardinoRBigiAEffect of Mg(2+), Sr(2+), and Mn(2+) on the chemico-physical and in vitro biological properties of calcium phosphate biomimetic coatings.J Inorg Biochem20091031216661674Google Scholar
134.YuXWangLJiangXRoweDWeiMBiomimetic CaP coating incorporated with parathyroid hormone improves the osseointegration of titanium implant.J Mater Sci Mater Med201223921772186Google Scholar
135.CiobanuGCiobanuOInvestigation on the effect of collagen and vitamins on biomimetic hydroxyapatite coating formation on titanium surfaces.Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl201333316831688Google Scholar
136.ZhouHLawrenceJGTounyAHBhaduriSBBiomimetic coating of bisphosphonate incorporated CDHA on Ti6Al4V.J Mater Sci Mater Med2012232365374Google Scholar
137.ForsgrenJBrohedeUStrømmeMEngqvistHCo-loading of bisphosphonates and antibiotics to a biomimetic hydroxyapatite coating.Biotechnol Lett201133612651268Google Scholar
138.BigiABoaniniECapucciniCet al.Biofunctional alendronate–hydroxyapatite thin films deposited by matrix assisted pulsed laser evaporation.Biomaterials20093061686177Google Scholar
139.MajidKTsengMDBakerKCReyes-TrocchiaAHerkowitzHNBiomimetic calcium phosphate coatings as bone morphogenetic protein delivery systems in spinal fusion.Spine J2011116560567Google Scholar
140.KokuboTKushitaniHSakkaSKitsugiTYamamuroTSolutions able to reproduce in vivo surface-structure changes in bioactive glass-ceramic A-W.J Biomed Mater Res1990246721734Google Scholar
141.AparicioCManeroJMCondeFet al.Acceleration of apatite nucleation on microrough bioactive titanium for bone-replacing implants.J Biomed Mater Res200782A3521529Google Scholar
142.LuXZhaoZLengYBiomimetic calcium phosphate coatings on nitric-acid-treated titanium surfaces.Mater Sci Eng C2007274700708Google Scholar
143.BigiABoaniniEBracciBet al.Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium: a new fast biomimetic method.Biomaterials2005261940854089Google Scholar
144.BracciBPanzavoltaSBigiAA new simplified calcifying solution to synthesize calcium phosphate coatings.Surf Coat Tech20132321321Google Scholar
145.KimHMMiyajiFKokuboTNakamuraTPreparation of bioactive Ti and its alloys via simple chemical surface treatment.J Biomed Mater Res1996323409417Google Scholar
146.LiuLKimSChanJShamTKMorphology and electronic structures of calcium phosphate coated titanium dioxide nanotubes.Proc MRS20111352mrss11-1352-gg18-01.Google Scholar
147.MüllerLMüllerFAPreparation of SBF with different HCO3- content and its influence on the composition of biomimetic apatites.Acta Biomater200622181189Google Scholar
148.BigiANicoli-AldiniNBracciBet al.In vitro culture of mesenchymal cells onto nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite-coated Ti13Nb13Zr alloy.J Biomed Mater Res200782A1213221Google Scholar
149.NijhuisAWNejadnikMRNudelmanFet al.Enzymatic pH control for biomimetic deposition of calcium phosphate coatings.Acta Biomater2014102931939Google Scholar
150.MaPXBiomimetic materials for tissue engineering.Adv Drug Deliv Rev2008602184198Google Scholar
151.LeeHJAhnSHKimGHThree-dimensional collagen/alginate hybrid scaffolds functionalized with a drug delivery system (DDS) for bone tissue regeneration.Chem Mater2012245881891Google Scholar
152.ManoJFSilvaGAAzevedoHSet al.Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: present status and some moving trends.J R Soc Interface20074179991030Google Scholar
153.TorresALGasparVMSerraIRet al.Bioactive polymeric-ceramic hybrid 3D scaffold for application in bone tissue regeneration.Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl201333744604469Google Scholar
154.RoginaAIvankovićMIvankovićHPreparation and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite within chitosan matrix.Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl201333845394544Google Scholar
155.PanzavoltaSTorricelliPAmadoriSet al.3D interconnected porous biomimetic scaffolds: In vitro cell response.J Biomed Mater Res A20131011235603570Google Scholar
156.LeoneGVolpatoMDNelliNet al.Continuous multilayered composite hydrogel as osteochondral substitute.J Biomed Mater Res A2015103825212530Google Scholar
157.AmadoriSTorricelliPPanzavoltaSParrilliAFiniMBigiAMulti-layered scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering: in vitro response of co-cultured human mesenchymal stem cells.Macromol Biosci2015151115351545Google Scholar
158.MoghadamMZHassanajiliSEsmaeilzadehFAyatollahiMAhmadiMFormation of porous HPCL/LPCL/HA scaffolds with supercritical CO2 gas foaming method.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater201769115127Google Scholar
159.PatlollaAArinzehTLEvaluating apatite formation and osteogenic activity of electrospun composites for bone tissue engineering.Biotechnol Bioeng201411110001017Google Scholar
160.YuCCChangJJLeeYHet al.Electrospun scaffolds composing of alginate, chitosan, collagen and hydroxyapatite for applying in bone tissue engineering.Mater Lett201393133136Google Scholar
161.ThomasVDeanDRJoseMVMathewBChowdhurySVohraYKNanostructured biocomposite scaffolds based on collagen coelectrospun with nanohydroxyapatite.Biomacromolecules200782631637Google Scholar
162.PanzavoltaSGualandiCFioraniABracciBFocareteMLBigiAFast coprecipitation of calcium phosphate nanoparticles inside gelatin nanofibers by tricoaxial electrospinning.J Nanomater2016(2016).Google Scholar
163.ButscherABohnerMHofmannSGaucklerLMüllerRStructural and material approaches to bone tissue engineering in powder-based three-dimensional printing.Acta Biomater201173907920Google Scholar
164.Esposito CorcioneCGervasoFScaleraFMontagnaFSanninoAMaffezzoliAThe feasibility of printing polylactic acid–nanohydroxyapatite composites using a low-cost fused deposition modeling 3D printer.J Appl Polym Sci20171341344656.Google Scholar
165.GbureckUHölzelTKlammertUWürzlerKMüllerFABarraletJEResorbable dicalcium phosphate bone substitutes prepared by 3D powder printing.Adv Funct Mater2007171839403945Google Scholar
166.HabibovicPGbureckUDoillonCJBassettDCvan BlitterswijkCABarraletJEOsteoconduction and osteoinduction of low-temperature 3D printed bioceramic implants.Biomaterials2008297944953Google Scholar
167.DevilleSSaizETomsiaAPFreeze casting of hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Biomaterials2006273254805489Google Scholar
168.DevilleSSaizENallaRKTomsiaAPFreezing as a path to build complex composites.Science20063115760515518Google Scholar
169.BaiHChenYDelattreBTomsiaAPRitchieROBioinspired large-scale aligned porous materials assembled with dual temperature gradients.Sci Adv2015111e1500849.Google Scholar
170.WuSLiuXYeungKWKLiCYangXBiomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Mater Sci Eng R-Rep201480136Google Scholar
171.TarafderSBoseSPolycaprolactone-coated 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: in vitro alendronate release behavior and local delivery effect on in vivo osteogenesis.ACS Appl Mater Interfaces201461399559965Google Scholar
172.PanzavoltaSTorricelliPCasolariSet al.Gelatin porous scaffolds as delivery systems of calcium alendronate.Macromol Biosci20171731600272.Google Scholar
173.WangGBabadağliMEUludağHBisphosphonate-derivatized liposomes to control drug release from collagen/hydroxyapatite scaffolds.Mol Pharm20118410251034Google Scholar
174.LiJBakerBAMouXet al.Biopolymer/calcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Adv Healthc Mater201434469484Google Scholar
175.BagherifardSMediating bone regeneration by means of drug eluting implants: From passive to smart strategies.Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl20177112411252Google Scholar
176.Martínez-VázquezFJCabañasMVParisJLLozanoDVallet-RegíMFabrication of novel Si-doped hydroxyapatite/gelatine scaffolds by rapid prototyping for drug delivery and bone regeneration.Acta Biomater201515200209Google Scholar
177.SunXKangYBaoJZhangYYangYZhouXModeling vascularized bone regeneration within a porous biodegradable CaP scaffold loaded with growth factors.Biomaterials20133449714981Google Scholar
178.MurphyCMSchindelerAGleesonJPet al.A collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold allows for binding and co-delivery of recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins and bisphosphonates.Acta Biomater201410522502258Google Scholar
Department of Chemistry “G. Ciamician”, University of Bologna, Bologna - Italy
Article usage statistics
The blue line displays unique views in the time frame indicated.
The yellow line displays unique downloads.
Views and downloads are counted only once per session.
No supplementary material is available for this article.